最大耗氧量标准在肥胖、绝经后妇女中的适用性。

Noella A. Misquita, D. Davis, C. Dobrovolny, Alice S. Ryan, K. E. Dennis, Barbara J. Nicklas
{"title":"最大耗氧量标准在肥胖、绝经后妇女中的适用性。","authors":"Noella A. Misquita, D. Davis, C. Dobrovolny, Alice S. Ryan, K. E. Dennis, Barbara J. Nicklas","doi":"10.1089/152460901753285787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the applicability of using three standard criteria (age-predicted maximal heart rate [HRmax], respiratory exchange ratio [RER>1.10], and plateau in oxygen uptake [Vo(2)] for the measurement of maximal oxygen consumption (Vo(2)max) in postmenopausal women. One hundred eight postmenopausal (60 +/- 6 years), overweight and obese (body mass index [BMI] = 33 +/- 4 kg/m(2)), sedentary (Vo(2)max = 19 +/- 3 ml/kg/min) women underwent one exercise test (Bruce protocol), and 71 of these women underwent a second test (modified Balke protocol). On test 1, 69 (64%) women achieved age-predicted HRmax, 61 (57%) reached an RER>1.10, and 16 (15%) achieved a plateau in Vo(2) (<2 ml/kg/min change). Women who reached age-predicted HRmax and reached an RER of at least 1.10 had a higher peak Vo(2) (p <0.01) than women who did not meet these criteria. There was no difference in the highest V02 obtained between women who did and did not achieve a plateau in Vo(2) during test 1 (p = 0.55). Resting HR, HRmax, and RER were similar between the two tests. On average, peak Vo(2) was higher on the second test (p <0.01). However, Vo(2)max was not different between exercise tests in women who achieved at least two of the three criteria on both tests (n = 24; test 1, 19.4 +/- 3.4; test 2: 19.8 +/- 3.7 ml/kg/min; p = NS). In addition, Vo(2)max was similar between the two exercise tests in 14 women who reached a plateau on the second test but did not reach a plateau on the first test (19.2 +/- 3.3 vs. 19.6 +/- 4.2 ml/kg/min; p = NS). We conclude that achievement of a plateau in Vo(2) is not a necessary criterion for a valid measurement of Vo(2)max in overweight and obese, sedentary, postmenopausal women.","PeriodicalId":80044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of maximal oxygen consumption criteria in obese, postmenopausal women.\",\"authors\":\"Noella A. Misquita, D. Davis, C. Dobrovolny, Alice S. Ryan, K. E. Dennis, Barbara J. Nicklas\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/152460901753285787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the applicability of using three standard criteria (age-predicted maximal heart rate [HRmax], respiratory exchange ratio [RER>1.10], and plateau in oxygen uptake [Vo(2)] for the measurement of maximal oxygen consumption (Vo(2)max) in postmenopausal women. One hundred eight postmenopausal (60 +/- 6 years), overweight and obese (body mass index [BMI] = 33 +/- 4 kg/m(2)), sedentary (Vo(2)max = 19 +/- 3 ml/kg/min) women underwent one exercise test (Bruce protocol), and 71 of these women underwent a second test (modified Balke protocol). On test 1, 69 (64%) women achieved age-predicted HRmax, 61 (57%) reached an RER>1.10, and 16 (15%) achieved a plateau in Vo(2) (<2 ml/kg/min change). Women who reached age-predicted HRmax and reached an RER of at least 1.10 had a higher peak Vo(2) (p <0.01) than women who did not meet these criteria. There was no difference in the highest V02 obtained between women who did and did not achieve a plateau in Vo(2) during test 1 (p = 0.55). Resting HR, HRmax, and RER were similar between the two tests. On average, peak Vo(2) was higher on the second test (p <0.01). However, Vo(2)max was not different between exercise tests in women who achieved at least two of the three criteria on both tests (n = 24; test 1, 19.4 +/- 3.4; test 2: 19.8 +/- 3.7 ml/kg/min; p = NS). In addition, Vo(2)max was similar between the two exercise tests in 14 women who reached a plateau on the second test but did not reach a plateau on the first test (19.2 +/- 3.3 vs. 19.6 +/- 4.2 ml/kg/min; p = NS). We conclude that achievement of a plateau in Vo(2) is not a necessary criterion for a valid measurement of Vo(2)max in overweight and obese, sedentary, postmenopausal women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460901753285787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460901753285787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

本研究探讨了使用三个标准(年龄预测最大心率[HRmax]、呼吸交换比[RER 1.10]和氧摄取平台[Vo(2)])测量绝经后妇女最大耗氧量(Vo(2)max)的适用性。108名绝经后(60 +/- 6岁)、超重和肥胖(体重指数[BMI] = 33 +/- 4 kg/m(2))、久坐(Vo(2)max = 19 +/- 3 ml/kg/min)的妇女接受了一次运动测试(Bruce方案),其中71名妇女接受了第二次测试(修改的Balke方案)。在测试1中,69名(64%)女性达到了年龄预测的HRmax, 61名(57%)女性达到了RER 1.10, 16名(15%)女性达到了Vo(2)的平台(<2 ml/kg/min变化)。与未达到这些标准的女性相比,达到年龄预测HRmax和RER至少为1.10的女性的Vo峰值更高(p <0.01)。在测试1中,Vo(2)达到平台的女性和未达到平台的女性之间获得的最高V02没有差异(p = 0.55)。静息HR, HRmax和RER在两种测试之间相似。平均而言,Vo(2)峰值在第二次测试时更高(p <0.01)。然而,在两项测试中至少达到三项标准中的两项的女性的运动测试中,Vo(2)max没有差异(n = 24;测试1,19.4 +/- 3.4;试验2:19.8±3.7 ml/kg/min;p = NS)。此外,14名在第二次测试中达到平台期而在第一次测试中未达到平台期的女性的Vo(2)max在两次运动测试中相似(19.2 +/- 3.3 vs. 19.6 +/- 4.2 ml/kg/min;p = NS)。我们的结论是,对于超重、肥胖、久坐、绝经后妇女,Vo(2)达到平台期并不是有效测量Vo(2)max的必要标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of maximal oxygen consumption criteria in obese, postmenopausal women.
This study examines the applicability of using three standard criteria (age-predicted maximal heart rate [HRmax], respiratory exchange ratio [RER>1.10], and plateau in oxygen uptake [Vo(2)] for the measurement of maximal oxygen consumption (Vo(2)max) in postmenopausal women. One hundred eight postmenopausal (60 +/- 6 years), overweight and obese (body mass index [BMI] = 33 +/- 4 kg/m(2)), sedentary (Vo(2)max = 19 +/- 3 ml/kg/min) women underwent one exercise test (Bruce protocol), and 71 of these women underwent a second test (modified Balke protocol). On test 1, 69 (64%) women achieved age-predicted HRmax, 61 (57%) reached an RER>1.10, and 16 (15%) achieved a plateau in Vo(2) (<2 ml/kg/min change). Women who reached age-predicted HRmax and reached an RER of at least 1.10 had a higher peak Vo(2) (p <0.01) than women who did not meet these criteria. There was no difference in the highest V02 obtained between women who did and did not achieve a plateau in Vo(2) during test 1 (p = 0.55). Resting HR, HRmax, and RER were similar between the two tests. On average, peak Vo(2) was higher on the second test (p <0.01). However, Vo(2)max was not different between exercise tests in women who achieved at least two of the three criteria on both tests (n = 24; test 1, 19.4 +/- 3.4; test 2: 19.8 +/- 3.7 ml/kg/min; p = NS). In addition, Vo(2)max was similar between the two exercise tests in 14 women who reached a plateau on the second test but did not reach a plateau on the first test (19.2 +/- 3.3 vs. 19.6 +/- 4.2 ml/kg/min; p = NS). We conclude that achievement of a plateau in Vo(2) is not a necessary criterion for a valid measurement of Vo(2)max in overweight and obese, sedentary, postmenopausal women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信