审计人员对慈善机构发布持续经营修改审计意见的倾向和准确性

IF 3.5 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yitang (Jenny) Yang, R. Simnett, Elizabeth Carson
{"title":"审计人员对慈善机构发布持续经营修改审计意见的倾向和准确性","authors":"Yitang (Jenny) Yang, R. Simnett, Elizabeth Carson","doi":"10.1111/ACFI.12823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper identifies the factors which impact auditors’ propensity to issue going concern modified audit opinions (GCOs) and examines their accuracy in issuing such opinions for charities by comparing with two outcomes, cancellation of ABN status and the revoking of operating status on the ACNC database. We find that GCOs are more likely for charities which are smaller, in greater financial distress, received a prior year GCO, had smaller proportion of donation income and had economic dependence on subsequent funding. Big 4 auditors are less likely to issue GCOs, but they do not show significant differences in GCO reporting mis-classification.","PeriodicalId":45436,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditors’ propensity and accuracy in issuing going‐concern modified audit opinions for charities\",\"authors\":\"Yitang (Jenny) Yang, R. Simnett, Elizabeth Carson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ACFI.12823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper identifies the factors which impact auditors’ propensity to issue going concern modified audit opinions (GCOs) and examines their accuracy in issuing such opinions for charities by comparing with two outcomes, cancellation of ABN status and the revoking of operating status on the ACNC database. We find that GCOs are more likely for charities which are smaller, in greater financial distress, received a prior year GCO, had smaller proportion of donation income and had economic dependence on subsequent funding. Big 4 auditors are less likely to issue GCOs, but they do not show significant differences in GCO reporting mis-classification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ACFI.12823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ACFI.12823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过比较ACNC数据库中撤销ABN状态和撤销经营状态两种结果,确定了影响审计人员发布持续经营修正审计意见倾向的因素,并检验了审计人员在为慈善机构发布此类意见时的准确性。我们发现,规模较小、财务状况较差、上一年获得过GCO、捐赠收入占比较小、经济上依赖后续资金的慈善机构更有可能获得GCO。四大审计机构发布GCO的可能性较小,但它们在GCO报告错误分类方面没有显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditors’ propensity and accuracy in issuing going‐concern modified audit opinions for charities
This paper identifies the factors which impact auditors’ propensity to issue going concern modified audit opinions (GCOs) and examines their accuracy in issuing such opinions for charities by comparing with two outcomes, cancellation of ABN status and the revoking of operating status on the ACNC database. We find that GCOs are more likely for charities which are smaller, in greater financial distress, received a prior year GCO, had smaller proportion of donation income and had economic dependence on subsequent funding. Big 4 auditors are less likely to issue GCOs, but they do not show significant differences in GCO reporting mis-classification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
10.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信