通过数值模拟比较简化卡车模型上减阻装置的有效性

Terrance Charles, Zhiyin Yang
{"title":"通过数值模拟比较简化卡车模型上减阻装置的有效性","authors":"Terrance Charles, Zhiyin Yang","doi":"10.3390/modelling3030019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aerodynamic efficiency of trucks is very low because of their non-streamlined box shape, which is subject to practical constraints, leaving little room for improvement in terms of aerodynamic efficiency. Hence, other means of improving the aerodynamic efficiency of trucks are needed, and one practical yet relatively simple method to reduce aerodynamic drag is deploying drag reduction devices on trucks. This paper describes a numerical study of flow over a simplified truck with drag reduction devices. The numerical approach employed was Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS). Four test cases with different drag reduction devices deployed around the tractor–trailer gap region were studied. The effectiveness of those drag reduction devices was assessed, and it was demonstrated that in all four cases, the aerodynamic drag was reduced compared with the baseline case without any drag reduction devices. The most effective device was case 4 (about 24% reduction), with a roof deflector, side extenders, and five cross-flow vortex trap devices (CVTDs). Flow field analysis was performed to shed light on drag reduction mechanisms, which confirmed our previous findings that the main reason for the drag reduction was the reduced pressure on the front face of the trailer, while the reduction in the turbulence level in the tractor–trailer gap region contributed much less to the overall drag reduction.","PeriodicalId":89310,"journal":{"name":"WIT transactions on modelling and simulation","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Drag Reduction Devices on a Simplified Truck Model through Numerical Simulation\",\"authors\":\"Terrance Charles, Zhiyin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/modelling3030019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aerodynamic efficiency of trucks is very low because of their non-streamlined box shape, which is subject to practical constraints, leaving little room for improvement in terms of aerodynamic efficiency. Hence, other means of improving the aerodynamic efficiency of trucks are needed, and one practical yet relatively simple method to reduce aerodynamic drag is deploying drag reduction devices on trucks. This paper describes a numerical study of flow over a simplified truck with drag reduction devices. The numerical approach employed was Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS). Four test cases with different drag reduction devices deployed around the tractor–trailer gap region were studied. The effectiveness of those drag reduction devices was assessed, and it was demonstrated that in all four cases, the aerodynamic drag was reduced compared with the baseline case without any drag reduction devices. The most effective device was case 4 (about 24% reduction), with a roof deflector, side extenders, and five cross-flow vortex trap devices (CVTDs). Flow field analysis was performed to shed light on drag reduction mechanisms, which confirmed our previous findings that the main reason for the drag reduction was the reduced pressure on the front face of the trailer, while the reduction in the turbulence level in the tractor–trailer gap region contributed much less to the overall drag reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIT transactions on modelling and simulation\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIT transactions on modelling and simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling3030019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT transactions on modelling and simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling3030019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于卡车的非流线型箱体外形,其气动效率非常低,受到实际使用的限制,在气动效率方面的提升空间很小。因此,需要其他方法来提高卡车的气动效率,而在卡车上安装减阻装置是一种实用但相对简单的减少气动阻力的方法。本文描述了一种装有减阻装置的简化卡车的流动数值研究。数值方法采用reynolds -average Navier-Stokes (RANS)。研究了在牵引车-挂车间隙区域布置不同减阻装置的4个测试案例。对这些减阻装置的有效性进行了评估,结果表明,在所有四种情况下,与没有任何减阻装置的基线情况相比,气动阻力都有所降低。最有效的装置是病例4(约减少24%),其中包括一个顶部偏转器,侧面扩展器和五个交叉流涡流捕获装置(CVTDs)。流场分析揭示了减阻机制,证实了我们之前的研究结果,即减阻的主要原因是拖车前部的压力降低,而拖拉机-拖车间隙区域湍流水平的降低对整体减阻的贡献要小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Drag Reduction Devices on a Simplified Truck Model through Numerical Simulation
The aerodynamic efficiency of trucks is very low because of their non-streamlined box shape, which is subject to practical constraints, leaving little room for improvement in terms of aerodynamic efficiency. Hence, other means of improving the aerodynamic efficiency of trucks are needed, and one practical yet relatively simple method to reduce aerodynamic drag is deploying drag reduction devices on trucks. This paper describes a numerical study of flow over a simplified truck with drag reduction devices. The numerical approach employed was Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS). Four test cases with different drag reduction devices deployed around the tractor–trailer gap region were studied. The effectiveness of those drag reduction devices was assessed, and it was demonstrated that in all four cases, the aerodynamic drag was reduced compared with the baseline case without any drag reduction devices. The most effective device was case 4 (about 24% reduction), with a roof deflector, side extenders, and five cross-flow vortex trap devices (CVTDs). Flow field analysis was performed to shed light on drag reduction mechanisms, which confirmed our previous findings that the main reason for the drag reduction was the reduced pressure on the front face of the trailer, while the reduction in the turbulence level in the tractor–trailer gap region contributed much less to the overall drag reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信