不同时间尺度的生态足迹趋同分析:来自南方共同市场国家的证据

IF 4 4区环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Energy & Environment Pub Date : 2022-08-17 DOI:10.1177/0958305X221120930

Uğur Ursavaş, Veli Yılancı

{"title":"不同时间尺度的生态足迹趋同分析:来自南方共同市场国家的证据","authors":"Uğur Ursavaş, Veli Yılancı","doi":"10.1177/0958305X221120930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the convergence in ecological footprint per capita across Southern Common Market countries over the period 1961–2016 within the framework of the environmental convergence hypothesis. However, unlike the existing literature, which mainly tests the convergence for the overall period, this study follows a different path. First, the time series is decomposed into different frequencies using the discrete wavelet transform method. Then, using the Fourier Augmented Dickey-Fuller and Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root tests, convergence in ecological footprint per capita is tested for different time scales; short-run, medium-run, and finally long-run. The results indicate that countries show different convergence tendencies at different time scales. While the results support the convergence hypothesis for all countries in the short-run, the convergence hypothesis holds for only four and three of the five countries in the medium and long-run, respectively. Besides, the results show that the convergence hypothesis holds for only Uruguay for the whole period.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"28 1","pages":"429 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergence analysis of ecological footprint at different time scales: Evidence from Southern Common Market countries\",\"authors\":\"Uğur Ursavaş, Veli Yılancı\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0958305X221120930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the convergence in ecological footprint per capita across Southern Common Market countries over the period 1961–2016 within the framework of the environmental convergence hypothesis. However, unlike the existing literature, which mainly tests the convergence for the overall period, this study follows a different path. First, the time series is decomposed into different frequencies using the discrete wavelet transform method. Then, using the Fourier Augmented Dickey-Fuller and Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root tests, convergence in ecological footprint per capita is tested for different time scales; short-run, medium-run, and finally long-run. The results indicate that countries show different convergence tendencies at different time scales. While the results support the convergence hypothesis for all countries in the short-run, the convergence hypothesis holds for only four and three of the five countries in the medium and long-run, respectively. Besides, the results show that the convergence hypothesis holds for only Uruguay for the whole period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"429 - 442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221120930\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221120930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文在环境趋同假设的框架下，对1961-2016年南方共同市场国家人均生态足迹的趋同进行了研究。然而，与现有文献主要测试整个时期的收敛性不同，本研究采用了不同的路径。首先，利用离散小波变换方法将时间序列分解为不同的频率。然后，利用Fourier增广Dickey-Fuller和增广Dickey-Fuller单位根检验，检验了不同时间尺度下人均生态足迹的收敛性;短跑，中跑，最后是长跑。结果表明，各国在不同的时间尺度上表现出不同的趋同趋势。虽然研究结果在短期内支持所有国家的趋同假设，但在中期和长期内，趋同假设分别只适用于五个国家中的四个和三个。此外，研究结果表明，在整个时期内，收敛假设只对乌拉圭成立。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Convergence analysis of ecological footprint at different time scales: Evidence from Southern Common Market countries

This study investigates the convergence in ecological footprint per capita across Southern Common Market countries over the period 1961–2016 within the framework of the environmental convergence hypothesis. However, unlike the existing literature, which mainly tests the convergence for the overall period, this study follows a different path. First, the time series is decomposed into different frequencies using the discrete wavelet transform method. Then, using the Fourier Augmented Dickey-Fuller and Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root tests, convergence in ecological footprint per capita is tested for different time scales; short-run, medium-run, and finally long-run. The results indicate that countries show different convergence tendencies at different time scales. While the results support the convergence hypothesis for all countries in the short-run, the convergence hypothesis holds for only four and three of the five countries in the medium and long-run, respectively. Besides, the results show that the convergence hypothesis holds for only Uruguay for the whole period.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Energy & Environment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

7.10%

发文量

157

期刊介绍： Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.