带延期补货的团购拍卖的最优阈值

Li Du, Jiejian Feng
{"title":"带延期补货的团购拍卖的最优阈值","authors":"Li Du, Jiejian Feng","doi":"10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The group-buying auction is often used in the B2C market. The seller here is offered a quantity-discount-price contract and implements a replenishment postponement policy. We show that when customer's valuation follows a uniform distribution, the group-buying auction does not always outperform the fixed pricing. The optimal group-buying threshold is shown to depend on only purchasing costs, prices and the upper bound of customer's valuation.","PeriodicalId":6326,"journal":{"name":"2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","volume":"58 1","pages":"181-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal threshold in the group-buying auction with replenishment postponement\",\"authors\":\"Li Du, Jiejian Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The group-buying auction is often used in the B2C market. The seller here is offered a quantity-discount-price contract and implements a replenishment postponement policy. We show that when customer's valuation follows a uniform distribution, the group-buying auction does not always outperform the fixed pricing. The optimal group-buying threshold is shown to depend on only purchasing costs, prices and the upper bound of customer's valuation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"181-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

团购拍卖是B2C市场中常用的一种方式。卖方在这里获得了数量折扣价格合同,并实施了延期补货政策。我们发现,当顾客的估价服从均匀分布时,团购拍卖并不总是优于固定定价。最优团购阈值仅取决于采购成本、价格和顾客评价的上限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal threshold in the group-buying auction with replenishment postponement
The group-buying auction is often used in the B2C market. The seller here is offered a quantity-discount-price contract and implements a replenishment postponement policy. We show that when customer's valuation follows a uniform distribution, the group-buying auction does not always outperform the fixed pricing. The optimal group-buying threshold is shown to depend on only purchasing costs, prices and the upper bound of customer's valuation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信