雄性斑眼鱼的比较渔具选择性及其捕获方法对孵化成功率的影响

K. Koupal, J. Satterfield, S. Flickinger
{"title":"雄性斑眼鱼的比较渔具选择性及其捕获方法对孵化成功率的影响","authors":"K. Koupal, J. Satterfield, S. Flickinger","doi":"10.1577/1548-8640(1997)059<0218:CGSFMW>2.3.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Spawn-taking efforts for walleyes Stizostedion vitreum in Colorado were used to evaluate gear selectivity in terms of catch per unit effort (CPUE) and sex ratio. Seasonal electrofishing CPUE ranged from 28 to 197 walleyes/h, whereas gillnetting CPUE ranged between 0.5 and 3.0 walleyes/net-night. Corresponding sex ratios (male: female) for these gears ranged between 9.5 and 48.3 for electrofishing and 0.3 and 0.5 for gillnetting. Weighted percent hatching success was also determined for eggs fertilized with milt from electrofished males versus gillnetted males to determine if electrofishing harmed male gametes. The weighted percent hatch for electrofishing was 69.1%, compared with 76.9% for gillnetting (P = 0.357). These results suggest that electrofishing may be used to enhance numbers of male broodstock during spawn-taking operations. Electrofishing is an efficient means of capturing male broodstock during spawning season, and the resultant hatching percentage of eggs fertilized with these males...","PeriodicalId":22850,"journal":{"name":"The Progressive Fish-culturist","volume":"29 1","pages":"218-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Gear Selectivity for Male Walleyes and Influence of Method of Capture on Resultant Hatching Success\",\"authors\":\"K. Koupal, J. Satterfield, S. Flickinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1577/1548-8640(1997)059<0218:CGSFMW>2.3.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Spawn-taking efforts for walleyes Stizostedion vitreum in Colorado were used to evaluate gear selectivity in terms of catch per unit effort (CPUE) and sex ratio. Seasonal electrofishing CPUE ranged from 28 to 197 walleyes/h, whereas gillnetting CPUE ranged between 0.5 and 3.0 walleyes/net-night. Corresponding sex ratios (male: female) for these gears ranged between 9.5 and 48.3 for electrofishing and 0.3 and 0.5 for gillnetting. Weighted percent hatching success was also determined for eggs fertilized with milt from electrofished males versus gillnetted males to determine if electrofishing harmed male gametes. The weighted percent hatch for electrofishing was 69.1%, compared with 76.9% for gillnetting (P = 0.357). These results suggest that electrofishing may be used to enhance numbers of male broodstock during spawn-taking operations. Electrofishing is an efficient means of capturing male broodstock during spawning season, and the resultant hatching percentage of eggs fertilized with these males...\",\"PeriodicalId\":22850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Progressive Fish-culturist\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"218-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Progressive Fish-culturist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1997)059<0218:CGSFMW>2.3.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Progressive Fish-culturist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1997)059<0218:CGSFMW>2.3.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要以美国科罗拉多州黄颡鱼(waleyes Stizostedion vitum)的采卵努力量为研究对象,以单位努力渔获量(CPUE)和性别比评价其渔具选择性。季节性电捕鱼CPUE为28 ~ 197眼/h,刺网CPUE为0.5 ~ 3.0眼/net-night。这些渔具相应的性别比(男:女)为电渔具9.5至48.3,刺网渔具0.3至0.5。还测定了电钓雄鱼与刺网雄鱼的卵卵受精的加权孵化成功率,以确定电钓是否损害雄性配子。电捕法的加权孵化率为69.1%,刺网法为76.9% (P = 0.357)。这些结果表明,在采卵过程中,电钓可用于增加雄性亲鱼的数量。电钓是一种在产卵季节捕获雄性亲鱼的有效手段,由此产生的与这些雄性受精卵的孵化率…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Gear Selectivity for Male Walleyes and Influence of Method of Capture on Resultant Hatching Success
Abstract Spawn-taking efforts for walleyes Stizostedion vitreum in Colorado were used to evaluate gear selectivity in terms of catch per unit effort (CPUE) and sex ratio. Seasonal electrofishing CPUE ranged from 28 to 197 walleyes/h, whereas gillnetting CPUE ranged between 0.5 and 3.0 walleyes/net-night. Corresponding sex ratios (male: female) for these gears ranged between 9.5 and 48.3 for electrofishing and 0.3 and 0.5 for gillnetting. Weighted percent hatching success was also determined for eggs fertilized with milt from electrofished males versus gillnetted males to determine if electrofishing harmed male gametes. The weighted percent hatch for electrofishing was 69.1%, compared with 76.9% for gillnetting (P = 0.357). These results suggest that electrofishing may be used to enhance numbers of male broodstock during spawn-taking operations. Electrofishing is an efficient means of capturing male broodstock during spawning season, and the resultant hatching percentage of eggs fertilized with these males...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信