解开“例外状态”，重新定义不稳定性

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY

SPACE AND POLITY Pub Date : 2020-04-24 DOI:10.1080/13562576.2020.1755645

N. Ettlinger

{"title":"解开“例外状态”，重新定义不稳定性","authors":"N. Ettlinger","doi":"10.1080/13562576.2020.1755645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This provocation unbounds ‘state of exception’ to account for its sustainability and its role in daily life. I argue that sustaining a ‘state of exception’ requires a governmentality to govern and render the exceptional ‘normal’ over time, pointing to the mutual constitution of the two modes of governance. The omnipresent condition of possible shifts between sovereignty and governmentality relocates precarity from a statically defined objectified circumstance to the active slippage between these two fields of power. Yet whereas a ‘state of exception’ can become normalized, subjectivity cannot because the configuration of individuals’ multiple subjectivities differs relative to their lived experiences.","PeriodicalId":46632,"journal":{"name":"SPACE AND POLITY","volume":"25 1","pages":"401 - 407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbounding ‘states of exception’, reconceptualizing precarity\",\"authors\":\"N. Ettlinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13562576.2020.1755645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This provocation unbounds ‘state of exception’ to account for its sustainability and its role in daily life. I argue that sustaining a ‘state of exception’ requires a governmentality to govern and render the exceptional ‘normal’ over time, pointing to the mutual constitution of the two modes of governance. The omnipresent condition of possible shifts between sovereignty and governmentality relocates precarity from a statically defined objectified circumstance to the active slippage between these two fields of power. Yet whereas a ‘state of exception’ can become normalized, subjectivity cannot because the configuration of individuals’ multiple subjectivities differs relative to their lived experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"401 - 407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1755645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPACE AND POLITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1755645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

这种挑衅打破了“例外状态”的界限，以解释其可持续性及其在日常生活中的作用。我认为，维持“例外状态”需要一种治理方式来治理，并随着时间的推移使例外成为“正常”，指出了两种治理模式的相互构成。主权与治理之间可能发生的转换这种无所不在的状况，将不稳定性从静态定义的客观环境重新定位为这两个权力领域之间的主动滑动。然而，尽管“例外状态”可以变得正常化，主体性却不能，因为个体的多重主体性的配置相对于他们的生活经验而不同。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Unbounding ‘states of exception’, reconceptualizing precarity

ABSTRACT This provocation unbounds ‘state of exception’ to account for its sustainability and its role in daily life. I argue that sustaining a ‘state of exception’ requires a governmentality to govern and render the exceptional ‘normal’ over time, pointing to the mutual constitution of the two modes of governance. The omnipresent condition of possible shifts between sovereignty and governmentality relocates precarity from a statically defined objectified circumstance to the active slippage between these two fields of power. Yet whereas a ‘state of exception’ can become normalized, subjectivity cannot because the configuration of individuals’ multiple subjectivities differs relative to their lived experiences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

4.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.