利用物理工具优化水平射孔完井的石灰石酸化处理

Oswaldo Perez, F. Fragachán, Andrew G. Babey
{"title":"利用物理工具优化水平射孔完井的石灰石酸化处理","authors":"Oswaldo Perez, F. Fragachán, Andrew G. Babey","doi":"10.2118/197719-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To increase the likelihood of success of acid stimulation in limestone reservoirs, the treatment has to evenly cover the desired zone to allow controlled reaction rates that can result in a uniform conductivity pattern, or wormholes development radially across the pay zone. To achieve this ultimate goal, effective fluid diversion is required to reorient fluid path, from high to low injectivity areas. The selection of the right diversion technique is the key to obtaining successful stimulation results. Therefore, The objective of this work is to evaluate, and compare the stimulation efficiency of several diversion scenarios based on a highly reliable physics-based tool capable of simulating multiple completion types.\n This work will be focused on two typical diversion methods applicable to perforated completions, such as: 1) ball sealers, and 2) bio-degradable particles. A coupled model that consists of wellbore and reservoir flow is used to simulate acid, and limestone rock interactions for each diversion method. The model simulates fluid hydraulics in the wellbore, couples it with transient reservoir flow, and accounts for the formation skin effects derived from each diversion technique. The model also considers the effect of induced wormholes generation and the created injection profile along the completed reservoir zone.\n A horizontal well completion is presented to demonstrate the impact of each diversion approach in order to assess the effectiveness of a stimulation design. The most effective sensitivity combination of each diversion method is the focus of this work, and the treatment invasion distribution across the completed interval is compared to determine the best diversion approach. Different ball sealers geometries are considered to model irregular-shape perforation plugging efficiency and subsequent fluid diversion. The enhanced ball sealers model considers several physics parameters such as: inertial force, drag force, and ball-holding force along the wellbore during stimulation. On the other hand, the particulate diversion model includes an engineering model that is integrated into the wellbore-reservoir model to simulate the particle diversion.\n The particulate diversion model is a binary system that consists of: (1) large particles agglomerate along the tapered path of wormhole, and perforations, and (2) small particles jamming effect to create a temporary sealed structure that reduces the permeability of flow path and builds a temporary filter cake on perforations that is capable of holding up necessary differential pressures to divert fluid to other low-injectivity zones.\n The results show that the diversion efficiency depends basically on the length, perforationsconfiguration, and the reservoir heterogeneity. This case study demonstrates that particulate diversion offers the best alternative in terms of economic feasibility, and ease of application.\n The current tool has the unique capability combined with an integrated approach to optimize diversion scenarios for matrix acidizing stimulation on limestone reservoirs to generate a more uniform wormhole pattern, avoiding fluid loss, and tapping into under-stimulated rock areas for production enhancement.","PeriodicalId":11091,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Limestone Acidizing Treatments in Perforated Horizontal Completions by Implementing a Physics-Based Tool\",\"authors\":\"Oswaldo Perez, F. Fragachán, Andrew G. Babey\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197719-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n To increase the likelihood of success of acid stimulation in limestone reservoirs, the treatment has to evenly cover the desired zone to allow controlled reaction rates that can result in a uniform conductivity pattern, or wormholes development radially across the pay zone. To achieve this ultimate goal, effective fluid diversion is required to reorient fluid path, from high to low injectivity areas. The selection of the right diversion technique is the key to obtaining successful stimulation results. Therefore, The objective of this work is to evaluate, and compare the stimulation efficiency of several diversion scenarios based on a highly reliable physics-based tool capable of simulating multiple completion types.\\n This work will be focused on two typical diversion methods applicable to perforated completions, such as: 1) ball sealers, and 2) bio-degradable particles. A coupled model that consists of wellbore and reservoir flow is used to simulate acid, and limestone rock interactions for each diversion method. The model simulates fluid hydraulics in the wellbore, couples it with transient reservoir flow, and accounts for the formation skin effects derived from each diversion technique. The model also considers the effect of induced wormholes generation and the created injection profile along the completed reservoir zone.\\n A horizontal well completion is presented to demonstrate the impact of each diversion approach in order to assess the effectiveness of a stimulation design. The most effective sensitivity combination of each diversion method is the focus of this work, and the treatment invasion distribution across the completed interval is compared to determine the best diversion approach. Different ball sealers geometries are considered to model irregular-shape perforation plugging efficiency and subsequent fluid diversion. The enhanced ball sealers model considers several physics parameters such as: inertial force, drag force, and ball-holding force along the wellbore during stimulation. On the other hand, the particulate diversion model includes an engineering model that is integrated into the wellbore-reservoir model to simulate the particle diversion.\\n The particulate diversion model is a binary system that consists of: (1) large particles agglomerate along the tapered path of wormhole, and perforations, and (2) small particles jamming effect to create a temporary sealed structure that reduces the permeability of flow path and builds a temporary filter cake on perforations that is capable of holding up necessary differential pressures to divert fluid to other low-injectivity zones.\\n The results show that the diversion efficiency depends basically on the length, perforationsconfiguration, and the reservoir heterogeneity. This case study demonstrates that particulate diversion offers the best alternative in terms of economic feasibility, and ease of application.\\n The current tool has the unique capability combined with an integrated approach to optimize diversion scenarios for matrix acidizing stimulation on limestone reservoirs to generate a more uniform wormhole pattern, avoiding fluid loss, and tapping into under-stimulated rock areas for production enhancement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197719-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197719-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了提高石灰岩储层酸化增产成功的可能性,处理必须均匀覆盖所需区域,以控制反应速率,从而形成均匀的导电性模式,或者虫孔沿产层呈放射状发育。为了实现这一最终目标,需要有效的流体分流,重新定向流体路径,从高注入区域到低注入区域。选择合适的转向技术是获得成功增产效果的关键。因此,这项工作的目的是基于一种能够模拟多种完井类型的高度可靠的物理工具,评估和比较几种转向方案的增产效率。这项工作将集中于适用于射孔完井的两种典型的导流方法,如:1)球密封剂和2)生物可降解颗粒。一个由井筒和储层流动组成的耦合模型用于模拟每种导流方法的酸液和石灰石相互作用。该模型模拟了井筒中的流体力学,将其与瞬态油藏流动耦合,并考虑了每种导流技术产生的地层表皮效应。该模型还考虑了诱导虫孔的产生和沿完井储层形成的注入剖面的影响。为了评估增产设计的有效性,本文介绍了一口水平井完井,以展示每种转向方法的影响。每种导流方法的最有效的灵敏度组合是本研究的重点,并比较了整个完井段的治疗侵入分布,以确定最佳导流方法。考虑了不同形状的球密封器来模拟不规则形状的射孔堵塞效率和随后的流体分流。增强型密封球模型考虑了几个物理参数,如:增产过程中沿井筒的惯性力、阻力和抱球力。另一方面,颗粒导流模型包括一个工程模型,该模型与井筒-油藏模型相结合,用于模拟颗粒导流过程。颗粒导流模型是一个二元系统,包括:(1)大颗粒沿着虫孔和射孔的锥形路径聚集;(2)小颗粒堵塞作用,形成临时密封结构,降低流道的渗透率,并在射孔上形成临时滤饼,能够维持必要的压差,将流体转移到其他低注入率区域。结果表明,导流效果主要取决于射孔长度、射孔构型和储层非均质性。该案例研究表明,从经济可行性和易于应用的角度来看,颗粒导流是最佳的替代方案。目前的工具具有独特的能力,结合了一种综合方法,可以优化石灰岩储层基质酸化增产的转向方案,以产生更均匀的虫孔模式,避免流体漏失,并进入未被增产的岩石区域以提高产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Limestone Acidizing Treatments in Perforated Horizontal Completions by Implementing a Physics-Based Tool
To increase the likelihood of success of acid stimulation in limestone reservoirs, the treatment has to evenly cover the desired zone to allow controlled reaction rates that can result in a uniform conductivity pattern, or wormholes development radially across the pay zone. To achieve this ultimate goal, effective fluid diversion is required to reorient fluid path, from high to low injectivity areas. The selection of the right diversion technique is the key to obtaining successful stimulation results. Therefore, The objective of this work is to evaluate, and compare the stimulation efficiency of several diversion scenarios based on a highly reliable physics-based tool capable of simulating multiple completion types. This work will be focused on two typical diversion methods applicable to perforated completions, such as: 1) ball sealers, and 2) bio-degradable particles. A coupled model that consists of wellbore and reservoir flow is used to simulate acid, and limestone rock interactions for each diversion method. The model simulates fluid hydraulics in the wellbore, couples it with transient reservoir flow, and accounts for the formation skin effects derived from each diversion technique. The model also considers the effect of induced wormholes generation and the created injection profile along the completed reservoir zone. A horizontal well completion is presented to demonstrate the impact of each diversion approach in order to assess the effectiveness of a stimulation design. The most effective sensitivity combination of each diversion method is the focus of this work, and the treatment invasion distribution across the completed interval is compared to determine the best diversion approach. Different ball sealers geometries are considered to model irregular-shape perforation plugging efficiency and subsequent fluid diversion. The enhanced ball sealers model considers several physics parameters such as: inertial force, drag force, and ball-holding force along the wellbore during stimulation. On the other hand, the particulate diversion model includes an engineering model that is integrated into the wellbore-reservoir model to simulate the particle diversion. The particulate diversion model is a binary system that consists of: (1) large particles agglomerate along the tapered path of wormhole, and perforations, and (2) small particles jamming effect to create a temporary sealed structure that reduces the permeability of flow path and builds a temporary filter cake on perforations that is capable of holding up necessary differential pressures to divert fluid to other low-injectivity zones. The results show that the diversion efficiency depends basically on the length, perforationsconfiguration, and the reservoir heterogeneity. This case study demonstrates that particulate diversion offers the best alternative in terms of economic feasibility, and ease of application. The current tool has the unique capability combined with an integrated approach to optimize diversion scenarios for matrix acidizing stimulation on limestone reservoirs to generate a more uniform wormhole pattern, avoiding fluid loss, and tapping into under-stimulated rock areas for production enhancement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信