作弊情绪:在单人游戏中作弊的情感和心理好处

Cale J. Passmore, Matthew K. Miller, Jun Liu, Cody J. Phillips, R. Mandryk
{"title":"作弊情绪:在单人游戏中作弊的情感和心理好处","authors":"Cale J. Passmore, Matthew K. Miller, Jun Liu, Cody J. Phillips, R. Mandryk","doi":"10.1145/3410404.3414252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Players, developers, and researchers generally agree that \"cheating\" to gain an unfair advantage over others fosters negative player experiences. Despite social and experiential repercussions and cheating's negative stigma, the majority of players regularly cheat in some form. Fixation on cheating's social and moral axes disservices understanding the ways in which players cheat in single-player settings, cheating's potential benefits, and cheating's effects on player experience. Surveying 188 U.S. players on their beliefs, preferences, and experiences of cheating in single-player contexts, mixed-methods analyses reveal that, unlike in multiplayer contexts, most players endorse cheating in single-player settings. They do so to facilitate mood repair, stress relief, and flow, and to exercise agency over satisfying their psychological needs during gameplay. Building off prior studies in support of cheating, we discuss the ludic, cognitive, and wellness benefits found, and argue against imposing the moral dilemmas of multiplayer cheating on single-player contexts.","PeriodicalId":92838,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cheating Mood: The Emotional and Psychological Benefits of Cheating in Single-Player Games\",\"authors\":\"Cale J. Passmore, Matthew K. Miller, Jun Liu, Cody J. Phillips, R. Mandryk\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3410404.3414252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Players, developers, and researchers generally agree that \\\"cheating\\\" to gain an unfair advantage over others fosters negative player experiences. Despite social and experiential repercussions and cheating's negative stigma, the majority of players regularly cheat in some form. Fixation on cheating's social and moral axes disservices understanding the ways in which players cheat in single-player settings, cheating's potential benefits, and cheating's effects on player experience. Surveying 188 U.S. players on their beliefs, preferences, and experiences of cheating in single-player contexts, mixed-methods analyses reveal that, unlike in multiplayer contexts, most players endorse cheating in single-player settings. They do so to facilitate mood repair, stress relief, and flow, and to exercise agency over satisfying their psychological needs during gameplay. Building off prior studies in support of cheating, we discuss the ludic, cognitive, and wellness benefits found, and argue against imposing the moral dilemmas of multiplayer cheating on single-player contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

玩家、开发者和研究人员普遍认为,通过“作弊”来获得不公平的优势会带来消极的玩家体验。尽管社交和体验的影响和作弊的负面污名,大多数玩家经常以某种形式作弊。专注于作弊的社会和道德层面,不利于理解玩家在单人游戏中作弊的方式、作弊的潜在好处以及作弊对玩家体验的影响。通过调查188名美国玩家在单人游戏环境中的信念、偏好和作弊经历,混合方法分析显示,与多人游戏环境不同,大多数玩家支持单人游戏环境中的作弊行为。他们这样做是为了促进情绪修复、缓解压力和心流,并在游戏过程中行使代理而不是满足他们的心理需求。在之前支持作弊的研究的基础上,我们讨论了发现的搞笑、认知和健康益处,并反对将多人作弊的道德困境强加于单人游戏环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cheating Mood: The Emotional and Psychological Benefits of Cheating in Single-Player Games
Players, developers, and researchers generally agree that "cheating" to gain an unfair advantage over others fosters negative player experiences. Despite social and experiential repercussions and cheating's negative stigma, the majority of players regularly cheat in some form. Fixation on cheating's social and moral axes disservices understanding the ways in which players cheat in single-player settings, cheating's potential benefits, and cheating's effects on player experience. Surveying 188 U.S. players on their beliefs, preferences, and experiences of cheating in single-player contexts, mixed-methods analyses reveal that, unlike in multiplayer contexts, most players endorse cheating in single-player settings. They do so to facilitate mood repair, stress relief, and flow, and to exercise agency over satisfying their psychological needs during gameplay. Building off prior studies in support of cheating, we discuss the ludic, cognitive, and wellness benefits found, and argue against imposing the moral dilemmas of multiplayer cheating on single-player contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信