旅游研究的再想象:今天的积极更新、恢复和复兴

IF 0.5 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3727/194341421x16231805260340

{"title":"旅游研究的再想象:今天的积极更新、恢复和复兴","authors":"","doi":"10.3727/194341421x16231805260340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this second of three related papers on the adoption of disruptive qualitative cum interpretive research approaches, further coverage is given to the contexts and issues that ‘soft science’ social scientists (and humanists, and posthumanists) face today. While the first paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair here in Tourism, Culture and Communication*) made the case for the potential of disruptive qualitative research and subtle science outlooks in Tourism Studies — to help compensate for the domain’s perduring calibrative, managerialist and fast-capitalist perspectives — this follow-up manuscript (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah) is a consolidation of the advanced social justice material being covered overall. In this second of the three companion papers, the authors provide a further insight on the soft science concepts and constructions that have been aired in the important watershed book on ‘subtle science methodology’ by Brown, Carducci, and Kuby (entitled Disrupting Qualitative Inquiry). In this second of the three cousin manuscripts, the need for such research-as-resistance insights within Tourism Studies is expressed per medium of the complex ways in which tourism is imbricated with a sometimes bewildering litany of ongoing cultural, political, economic, environmental, psychic, and other matters, something that regularly renders the ontologies of tourism and travel/Tourism Studies difficult to profile and fathom on account of the fluid acumen (or plural knowability/critical multilogicality) required. At the end of this second manuscript, a further seven terms are explicated for the cumulative glossary being developed across the three companion manuscripts. These terms include ‘methodological freedom’ and ‘guided wandering’ (vis-avis the discursive cartography of tourism). The third paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo **) completes the additive glossary by explain terms and concepts that pertain to (1) the revised cognitive practices of tourism, and (2) the rhetorics of futurity of tourism.* The Unsettlement of Tourism Studies: Positive Decolonisation, Deep Listening, and Dethinking today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair, Tourism, Culture and Communication, 21 (2). ** The Evocative Power of Tourism Studies: Positive Interruption, Interdependence, and Imagining Forward Today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo [In Press: TCC])","PeriodicalId":41836,"journal":{"name":"TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE REIMAGINATION OF TOURISM STUDIES: POSITIVE RENEWAL, RESTORATION, AND REVIVAL TODAY\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.3727/194341421x16231805260340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this second of three related papers on the adoption of disruptive qualitative cum interpretive research approaches, further coverage is given to the contexts and issues that ‘soft science’ social scientists (and humanists, and posthumanists) face today. While the first paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair here in Tourism, Culture and Communication*) made the case for the potential of disruptive qualitative research and subtle science outlooks in Tourism Studies — to help compensate for the domain’s perduring calibrative, managerialist and fast-capitalist perspectives — this follow-up manuscript (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah) is a consolidation of the advanced social justice material being covered overall. In this second of the three companion papers, the authors provide a further insight on the soft science concepts and constructions that have been aired in the important watershed book on ‘subtle science methodology’ by Brown, Carducci, and Kuby (entitled Disrupting Qualitative Inquiry). In this second of the three cousin manuscripts, the need for such research-as-resistance insights within Tourism Studies is expressed per medium of the complex ways in which tourism is imbricated with a sometimes bewildering litany of ongoing cultural, political, economic, environmental, psychic, and other matters, something that regularly renders the ontologies of tourism and travel/Tourism Studies difficult to profile and fathom on account of the fluid acumen (or plural knowability/critical multilogicality) required. At the end of this second manuscript, a further seven terms are explicated for the cumulative glossary being developed across the three companion manuscripts. These terms include ‘methodological freedom’ and ‘guided wandering’ (vis-avis the discursive cartography of tourism). The third paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo **) completes the additive glossary by explain terms and concepts that pertain to (1) the revised cognitive practices of tourism, and (2) the rhetorics of futurity of tourism.* The Unsettlement of Tourism Studies: Positive Decolonisation, Deep Listening, and Dethinking today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair, Tourism, Culture and Communication, 21 (2). ** The Evocative Power of Tourism Studies: Positive Interruption, Interdependence, and Imagining Forward Today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo [In Press: TCC])\",\"PeriodicalId\":41836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3727/194341421x16231805260340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/194341421x16231805260340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在关于采用破坏性定性和解释性研究方法的三篇相关论文中的第二篇中，进一步介绍了“软科学”社会科学家(以及人文主义者和后人文主义者)今天面临的背景和问题。第一篇论文(由Hollinshead、Suleman和Nair撰写，在《旅游、文化与传播》中)提出了旅游研究中颠覆性质的研究和微妙的科学前景的潜力，以帮助弥补该领域持续的校准、管理主义和快速资本主义的观点——这篇后续手稿(由Hollinshead、Suleman和Vellah撰写)是对先进社会正义材料的全面整合。在这三篇论文的第二篇中，作者对布朗、卡杜奇和库比在《微妙科学方法论》(题为《颠覆定性探究》)一书中提出的软科学概念和结构提供了进一步的见解。在三份同类手稿中的第二份中，对旅游研究中这种研究抗性见解的需求通过复杂的方式表达出来，在这种方式中，旅游业与正在进行的文化、政治、经济、环境、心理和其他问题交织在一起，有时令人困惑。由于所需要的流动的敏锐(或多元的可知性/关键的多重逻辑性)，经常使旅游和旅游/旅游研究的本体论难以描绘和理解。在第二份手稿的末尾，为在三个配套手稿中开发的累积术语表解释了另外七个术语。这些术语包括“方法论自由”和“引导漫游”(相对于旅游的话语制图)。第三篇论文(由Hollinshead, Suleman和Lo **撰写)通过解释与(1)修订的旅游认知实践和(2)旅游未来修辞学有关的术语和概念，完成了添加性词汇表。**旅游研究的激发力:积极的中断、相互依存和向前想象(Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo [In Press: TCC])

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

THE REIMAGINATION OF TOURISM STUDIES: POSITIVE RENEWAL, RESTORATION, AND REVIVAL TODAY

In this second of three related papers on the adoption of disruptive qualitative cum interpretive research approaches, further coverage is given to the contexts and issues that ‘soft science’ social scientists (and humanists, and posthumanists) face today. While the first paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair here in Tourism, Culture and Communication*) made the case for the potential of disruptive qualitative research and subtle science outlooks in Tourism Studies — to help compensate for the domain’s perduring calibrative, managerialist and fast-capitalist perspectives — this follow-up manuscript (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah) is a consolidation of the advanced social justice material being covered overall. In this second of the three companion papers, the authors provide a further insight on the soft science concepts and constructions that have been aired in the important watershed book on ‘subtle science methodology’ by Brown, Carducci, and Kuby (entitled Disrupting Qualitative Inquiry). In this second of the three cousin manuscripts, the need for such research-as-resistance insights within Tourism Studies is expressed per medium of the complex ways in which tourism is imbricated with a sometimes bewildering litany of ongoing cultural, political, economic, environmental, psychic, and other matters, something that regularly renders the ontologies of tourism and travel/Tourism Studies difficult to profile and fathom on account of the fluid acumen (or plural knowability/critical multilogicality) required. At the end of this second manuscript, a further seven terms are explicated for the cumulative glossary being developed across the three companion manuscripts. These terms include ‘methodological freedom’ and ‘guided wandering’ (vis-avis the discursive cartography of tourism). The third paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo **) completes the additive glossary by explain terms and concepts that pertain to (1) the revised cognitive practices of tourism, and (2) the rhetorics of futurity of tourism.* The Unsettlement of Tourism Studies: Positive Decolonisation, Deep Listening, and Dethinking today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair, Tourism, Culture and Communication, 21 (2). ** The Evocative Power of Tourism Studies: Positive Interruption, Interdependence, and Imagining Forward Today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo [In Press: TCC])

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Tourism, Culture & Communication is the longest established international refereed journal that is dedicated to the cultural dimensions of tourism. The editors adopt a purposefully broad scope that welcomes readers and contributors from diverse disciplines and who are receptive in a wide variety of research methods. While potential cultural issues and identities are unlimited, there is a requirement that their consideration should relate to the tourism and hospitality domain. Tourism, Culture & Communication provides readers with multidisciplinary perspectives that consider topics and fields extending beyond national and indigenous cultures as they are traditionally understood and recognized. Coverage may extend to issues such as cultural dimensions of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), gender and tourism, managing tourists with disabilities, sport tourism, or age-specific tourism. Contributions that draw upon the communications literature to explain the tourism phenomenon are also particularly welcome. Beyond the focus on culture and communications, the editors recognize the important interrelationships with economies, society, politics, and the environment. The journal publishes high-quality research and applies a double-blind refereeing process. Tourism, Culture & Communication consists of main articles, major thematic reviews, position papers on theory and practice, and substantive case studies. A reports section covers specific initiatives and projects, “hot topics,” work-in-progress, and critical reviews.