{"title":"《星期二》的狂想曲:弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的《海浪》(1931)和英国皇家芭蕾舞团的《伍尔夫作品》(2015)中的暗流","authors":"C. Leung","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.24.4.0469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Despite its explicit allusion to Virginia Woolf, British choreographer Wayne McGregor’s modern ballet Woolf Works has not interested Woolf and modern scholars. Zeroing in on the final act (“Tuesday”) of McGregor’s Woolf Works, this article offers a revisionary reading of death, dance, and debilitation in The Waves by harnessing McGregor’s concurrent classical and avant-garde energies. Whereas interpretations of The Waves habitually lapse into the hackneyed invocation of its lyricism, I draw on its undercurrent and argue that both “Tuesday” and The Waves stage a break with this surface fluidity and the benign rhythm of the mundane. If McGregor’s “Tuesday” celebrates sinking with its antigravitational movements, The Waves condemns its characters, who are reluctant to relax their muscularity of control into a compulsive desire to stay afloat. As McGregor’s “Tuesday” suggests, there is an expedient labor in sinking, which Woolf configures as a movement toward truth. I thus read the inertness of sinking not as a failure to dance to what Lewis calls the “central rhythm” but an opposite energy that counters the military veneration of control and its mechanical adhesion to order in classical aesthetics.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"469 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rhapsody for “Tuesday”: Undercurrents in Virginia Woolf’s The Waves (1931) and the Royal Ballet’s Woolf Works (2015)\",\"authors\":\"C. Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/intelitestud.24.4.0469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Despite its explicit allusion to Virginia Woolf, British choreographer Wayne McGregor’s modern ballet Woolf Works has not interested Woolf and modern scholars. Zeroing in on the final act (“Tuesday”) of McGregor’s Woolf Works, this article offers a revisionary reading of death, dance, and debilitation in The Waves by harnessing McGregor’s concurrent classical and avant-garde energies. Whereas interpretations of The Waves habitually lapse into the hackneyed invocation of its lyricism, I draw on its undercurrent and argue that both “Tuesday” and The Waves stage a break with this surface fluidity and the benign rhythm of the mundane. If McGregor’s “Tuesday” celebrates sinking with its antigravitational movements, The Waves condemns its characters, who are reluctant to relax their muscularity of control into a compulsive desire to stay afloat. As McGregor’s “Tuesday” suggests, there is an expedient labor in sinking, which Woolf configures as a movement toward truth. I thus read the inertness of sinking not as a failure to dance to what Lewis calls the “central rhythm” but an opposite energy that counters the military veneration of control and its mechanical adhesion to order in classical aesthetics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"469 - 490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.24.4.0469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.24.4.0469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Rhapsody for “Tuesday”: Undercurrents in Virginia Woolf’s The Waves (1931) and the Royal Ballet’s Woolf Works (2015)
abstract:Despite its explicit allusion to Virginia Woolf, British choreographer Wayne McGregor’s modern ballet Woolf Works has not interested Woolf and modern scholars. Zeroing in on the final act (“Tuesday”) of McGregor’s Woolf Works, this article offers a revisionary reading of death, dance, and debilitation in The Waves by harnessing McGregor’s concurrent classical and avant-garde energies. Whereas interpretations of The Waves habitually lapse into the hackneyed invocation of its lyricism, I draw on its undercurrent and argue that both “Tuesday” and The Waves stage a break with this surface fluidity and the benign rhythm of the mundane. If McGregor’s “Tuesday” celebrates sinking with its antigravitational movements, The Waves condemns its characters, who are reluctant to relax their muscularity of control into a compulsive desire to stay afloat. As McGregor’s “Tuesday” suggests, there is an expedient labor in sinking, which Woolf configures as a movement toward truth. I thus read the inertness of sinking not as a failure to dance to what Lewis calls the “central rhythm” but an opposite energy that counters the military veneration of control and its mechanical adhesion to order in classical aesthetics.
期刊介绍:
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.