Adriá Iraida Haro Pérez, Hugo Alejandro Borjas García
{"title":"墨西哥的文化治理:神话?","authors":"Adriá Iraida Haro Pérez, Hugo Alejandro Borjas García","doi":"10.25267/periferica.2021.i22.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the mechanisms of participation for the Mexican society in the formulation of the cultural policy according to the General Law of Culture and Cultural Rights of 2017; in detail the breakthroughs of the National Meeting of Culture, space focused on the elaboration, coordination, and evaluation of the cultural policies. The cultural governance approach is employed to review the Law and the results of the first and second National Meeting of Culture.","PeriodicalId":32319,"journal":{"name":"Periferica","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gobernanza cultural en México ¿un mito?\",\"authors\":\"Adriá Iraida Haro Pérez, Hugo Alejandro Borjas García\",\"doi\":\"10.25267/periferica.2021.i22.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates the mechanisms of participation for the Mexican society in the formulation of the cultural policy according to the General Law of Culture and Cultural Rights of 2017; in detail the breakthroughs of the National Meeting of Culture, space focused on the elaboration, coordination, and evaluation of the cultural policies. The cultural governance approach is employed to review the Law and the results of the first and second National Meeting of Culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periferica\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periferica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25267/periferica.2021.i22.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periferica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25267/periferica.2021.i22.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article investigates the mechanisms of participation for the Mexican society in the formulation of the cultural policy according to the General Law of Culture and Cultural Rights of 2017; in detail the breakthroughs of the National Meeting of Culture, space focused on the elaboration, coordination, and evaluation of the cultural policies. The cultural governance approach is employed to review the Law and the results of the first and second National Meeting of Culture.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
