{"title":"应变理论与标签理论:透过反压迫镜头的批判性检视","authors":"Quan Huu Nguyen, H. V. Ngo","doi":"10.22329/CSW.V22I1.6900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Informed by the intersectionality and social justice perspectives, this article examines twoprominent schools of thought in criminology, namely strain and labelling theories. Our analysisreveals that strain and labelling theories have not adequately attended to social justice,particularly systemic oppression, in their explanations of youth crime. We propose the use ofrestorative justice as an alternative framework that may address the limitations of strain andlabelling theories.","PeriodicalId":44175,"journal":{"name":"Critical and Radical Social Work","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strain Theories and Labelling Theories: A Critical Examination through an Anti-Oppressive Lens\",\"authors\":\"Quan Huu Nguyen, H. V. Ngo\",\"doi\":\"10.22329/CSW.V22I1.6900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Informed by the intersectionality and social justice perspectives, this article examines twoprominent schools of thought in criminology, namely strain and labelling theories. Our analysisreveals that strain and labelling theories have not adequately attended to social justice,particularly systemic oppression, in their explanations of youth crime. We propose the use ofrestorative justice as an alternative framework that may address the limitations of strain andlabelling theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical and Radical Social Work\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical and Radical Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22329/CSW.V22I1.6900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical and Radical Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/CSW.V22I1.6900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strain Theories and Labelling Theories: A Critical Examination through an Anti-Oppressive Lens
Informed by the intersectionality and social justice perspectives, this article examines twoprominent schools of thought in criminology, namely strain and labelling theories. Our analysisreveals that strain and labelling theories have not adequately attended to social justice,particularly systemic oppression, in their explanations of youth crime. We propose the use ofrestorative justice as an alternative framework that may address the limitations of strain andlabelling theories.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
