利用三维方法对摩苏尔市卫星图像进行几何校正

I. Hussein, N. K. Ghazal
{"title":"利用三维方法对摩苏尔市卫星图像进行几何校正","authors":"I. Hussein, N. K. Ghazal","doi":"10.31257/2018/jkp/2020/120107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The important preprocessing techniques for remote sensing data and geometrical alteration is the geometric correction. In this paper ,it covers two models which are used in to three dimensions the physical model and the projective Transformation for SPOT 2 to determine the geometric correction of study region of Mosul city. The ground control points are located on SPOT 2 satellite image. These models are producing the X residual, Y residual and root mean square error (RMSE) and then comparing the effects of two models. The X residual for SPOT 2 physical model is lower than X residual for projective transformation at 0.1420, while the Y residual for physical model has higher comparing with Y residual for projective transformation at 0.1143and Total RMSE for SPOT 2 physical model is lower than Total RMSE for projective Transformation at 0.1823. The physical model is superior to Projective model, so that, it is highly recommended to be used for very precise application and not to be replaced by these non-physical models. For the physical model, it is clearly that, the altitude of the Ground Control Points (or Check Points) does not effect on its individual RMSE, when using Projective model the RMSE for high altitude was high ,where at low altitude it was low too(extreme relationship).","PeriodicalId":16215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kufa - Physics","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometric correction for satellite image of Mosul city using 3D methods\",\"authors\":\"I. Hussein, N. K. Ghazal\",\"doi\":\"10.31257/2018/jkp/2020/120107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The important preprocessing techniques for remote sensing data and geometrical alteration is the geometric correction. In this paper ,it covers two models which are used in to three dimensions the physical model and the projective Transformation for SPOT 2 to determine the geometric correction of study region of Mosul city. The ground control points are located on SPOT 2 satellite image. These models are producing the X residual, Y residual and root mean square error (RMSE) and then comparing the effects of two models. The X residual for SPOT 2 physical model is lower than X residual for projective transformation at 0.1420, while the Y residual for physical model has higher comparing with Y residual for projective transformation at 0.1143and Total RMSE for SPOT 2 physical model is lower than Total RMSE for projective Transformation at 0.1823. The physical model is superior to Projective model, so that, it is highly recommended to be used for very precise application and not to be replaced by these non-physical models. For the physical model, it is clearly that, the altitude of the Ground Control Points (or Check Points) does not effect on its individual RMSE, when using Projective model the RMSE for high altitude was high ,where at low altitude it was low too(extreme relationship).\",\"PeriodicalId\":16215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kufa - Physics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kufa - Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31257/2018/jkp/2020/120107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kufa - Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31257/2018/jkp/2020/120107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遥感数据和几何蚀变的重要预处理技术是几何校正。本文采用两种三维模型,即SPOT 2的物理模型和投影变换来确定摩苏尔市研究区域的几何校正量。地面控制点位于SPOT 2卫星图像上。这些模型产生X残差、Y残差和均方根误差(RMSE),然后比较两个模型的效果。SPOT 2物理模型的X残差低于投影变换的X残差(0.1420),而物理模型的Y残差高于投影变换的Y残差(0.1143),SPOT 2物理模型的Total RMSE低于投影变换的Total RMSE(0.1823)。物理模型优于投影模型,因此,强烈建议在非常精确的应用中使用,不要被这些非物理模型所取代。对于物理模型,很明显,地面控制点(或检查点)的高度不影响其单个RMSE,当使用投影模型时,高海拔的RMSE高,而在低海拔时它也低(极端关系)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geometric correction for satellite image of Mosul city using 3D methods
The important preprocessing techniques for remote sensing data and geometrical alteration is the geometric correction. In this paper ,it covers two models which are used in to three dimensions the physical model and the projective Transformation for SPOT 2 to determine the geometric correction of study region of Mosul city. The ground control points are located on SPOT 2 satellite image. These models are producing the X residual, Y residual and root mean square error (RMSE) and then comparing the effects of two models. The X residual for SPOT 2 physical model is lower than X residual for projective transformation at 0.1420, while the Y residual for physical model has higher comparing with Y residual for projective transformation at 0.1143and Total RMSE for SPOT 2 physical model is lower than Total RMSE for projective Transformation at 0.1823. The physical model is superior to Projective model, so that, it is highly recommended to be used for very precise application and not to be replaced by these non-physical models. For the physical model, it is clearly that, the altitude of the Ground Control Points (or Check Points) does not effect on its individual RMSE, when using Projective model the RMSE for high altitude was high ,where at low altitude it was low too(extreme relationship).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信