I-Gel与proseal喉罩气道:两种声门上气道装置在选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的比较

Gian Chauhan, K. Syal, Varun Prasad, R. Verma
{"title":"I-Gel与proseal喉罩气道:两种声门上气道装置在选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的比较","authors":"Gian Chauhan, K. Syal, Varun Prasad, R. Verma","doi":"10.4103/kaj.kaj_25_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Although tracheal intubation is considered ideal for airway management in laparoscopic surgeries, as it provides adequate ventilation and protects against pulmonary aspiration even in the presence of raised airway pressure due to carboperitoneum, supraglottic airway devices are beginning to be used more commonly in the same scenario in the right subset of patients. Materials and Methods: Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients coming for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries were divided into two groups of I-gel and proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) each. Ease of device insertion, time of device insertion, number of insertion attempts, airway leak pressure, and ease of insertion of gastric tube was observed. Patient was inspected for any “injury” of the lips, teeth or tongue, and the device for blood stain. 18–24 h after surgery, patients were interviewed for any “postoperative complications” such as sore throat, dysphagia, and hoarseness. Results: Both I-gel and PLMA can be used safely for laparoscopic cholecystectomy; ProSeal provides better sealing pressure while I-gel is easier to use practically and has less hemodynamic variations.","PeriodicalId":17751,"journal":{"name":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I-Gel versus proseal laryngeal mask airway: A comparison between two supraglottic airway devices in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients\",\"authors\":\"Gian Chauhan, K. Syal, Varun Prasad, R. Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/kaj.kaj_25_17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Although tracheal intubation is considered ideal for airway management in laparoscopic surgeries, as it provides adequate ventilation and protects against pulmonary aspiration even in the presence of raised airway pressure due to carboperitoneum, supraglottic airway devices are beginning to be used more commonly in the same scenario in the right subset of patients. Materials and Methods: Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients coming for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries were divided into two groups of I-gel and proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) each. Ease of device insertion, time of device insertion, number of insertion attempts, airway leak pressure, and ease of insertion of gastric tube was observed. Patient was inspected for any “injury” of the lips, teeth or tongue, and the device for blood stain. 18–24 h after surgery, patients were interviewed for any “postoperative complications” such as sore throat, dysphagia, and hoarseness. Results: Both I-gel and PLMA can be used safely for laparoscopic cholecystectomy; ProSeal provides better sealing pressure while I-gel is easier to use practically and has less hemodynamic variations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj.kaj_25_17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj.kaj_25_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:尽管气管插管被认为是腹腔镜手术中理想的气道管理方法,因为它提供了足够的通气,即使在由于碳腹膜引起的气道压力升高的情况下也能防止肺误吸,声门上气道装置开始在正确的患者亚群中越来越普遍地用于相同的情况。材料与方法:将80例美国麻醉学会I、II期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者分为I-凝胶组和proseal喉罩气道(PLMA)两组。观察装置插入的难易程度、装置插入时间、插入次数、气道漏压、胃管插入难易程度。检查患者唇、牙、舌有无“损伤”,检查血渍。术后18-24小时,随访患者是否有任何“术后并发症”,如喉咙痛、吞咽困难、声音嘶哑。结果:I-gel和PLMA均可安全用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术;ProSeal提供更好的密封压力,而I-gel更容易实际使用,血流动力学变化更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
I-Gel versus proseal laryngeal mask airway: A comparison between two supraglottic airway devices in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients
Introduction: Although tracheal intubation is considered ideal for airway management in laparoscopic surgeries, as it provides adequate ventilation and protects against pulmonary aspiration even in the presence of raised airway pressure due to carboperitoneum, supraglottic airway devices are beginning to be used more commonly in the same scenario in the right subset of patients. Materials and Methods: Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients coming for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries were divided into two groups of I-gel and proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) each. Ease of device insertion, time of device insertion, number of insertion attempts, airway leak pressure, and ease of insertion of gastric tube was observed. Patient was inspected for any “injury” of the lips, teeth or tongue, and the device for blood stain. 18–24 h after surgery, patients were interviewed for any “postoperative complications” such as sore throat, dysphagia, and hoarseness. Results: Both I-gel and PLMA can be used safely for laparoscopic cholecystectomy; ProSeal provides better sealing pressure while I-gel is easier to use practically and has less hemodynamic variations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信