{"title":"根据环境理论,提出了一种基于能量和火用的LCA的通用框架","authors":"S. Nielsen, S. Bastianoni","doi":"10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To estimate the environmental consequences of human activities with the purpose of achieving sustainable development, we need to carry out detailed analyses of the material and energy cycles of our society. The need to choose from several options is not a simple task. There are several reasons to this. First, the task contains an inherent problem of fia common unit. Second, we need a common and unifi ed methodology for matter and energy to compare results and evaluate systems using various types of analysis like life cycle assessment and material fl ux analysis. It is widely recognised that energy analysis following the fi rst law does not bring us much further in this context as it hardly gives any reliable indications on where to take action. Two recent measures, exergy and emergy, seem to offer the possibility of facilitating the process, by making it possible to fia common unit to both matter and energy and in addition bring in the perspectives of total environmental costs (a sort of ‘ecological footprint’ ‐ not in the strict sense) to the evaluation. The concepts may be used separately, but recent results from natural ecosystems indicate that the use of the two in combination might bring us even further in defi ning and achieving sustainable development. This in turn also allows us to construct new indicators specifi cally dedicated to and addressing the sustainability trends in the production systems or even society and may eventually be coupled to economics, at least at a micro-economic scale. The approach presented makes it possible to analyse the sustainability state of the systems in general software packages able to do a simple linear optimisation, and thus brings in the possibility of fithe most optimal way of coupling material and energetic fl uxes and thus assist in implementation of cleaner production and industrial ecology. To our knowledge, this is the fi rst time a common, unifi ed approach to the analysis of both cultural and natural ecosystems is presented.","PeriodicalId":13902,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","volume":"1 1","pages":"170-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A common framework for emergy and exergy based LCA in accordance with environ theory\",\"authors\":\"S. Nielsen, S. Bastianoni\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To estimate the environmental consequences of human activities with the purpose of achieving sustainable development, we need to carry out detailed analyses of the material and energy cycles of our society. The need to choose from several options is not a simple task. There are several reasons to this. First, the task contains an inherent problem of fia common unit. Second, we need a common and unifi ed methodology for matter and energy to compare results and evaluate systems using various types of analysis like life cycle assessment and material fl ux analysis. It is widely recognised that energy analysis following the fi rst law does not bring us much further in this context as it hardly gives any reliable indications on where to take action. Two recent measures, exergy and emergy, seem to offer the possibility of facilitating the process, by making it possible to fia common unit to both matter and energy and in addition bring in the perspectives of total environmental costs (a sort of ‘ecological footprint’ ‐ not in the strict sense) to the evaluation. The concepts may be used separately, but recent results from natural ecosystems indicate that the use of the two in combination might bring us even further in defi ning and achieving sustainable development. This in turn also allows us to construct new indicators specifi cally dedicated to and addressing the sustainability trends in the production systems or even society and may eventually be coupled to economics, at least at a micro-economic scale. The approach presented makes it possible to analyse the sustainability state of the systems in general software packages able to do a simple linear optimisation, and thus brings in the possibility of fithe most optimal way of coupling material and energetic fl uxes and thus assist in implementation of cleaner production and industrial ecology. To our knowledge, this is the fi rst time a common, unifi ed approach to the analysis of both cultural and natural ecosystems is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"170-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A common framework for emergy and exergy based LCA in accordance with environ theory
To estimate the environmental consequences of human activities with the purpose of achieving sustainable development, we need to carry out detailed analyses of the material and energy cycles of our society. The need to choose from several options is not a simple task. There are several reasons to this. First, the task contains an inherent problem of fia common unit. Second, we need a common and unifi ed methodology for matter and energy to compare results and evaluate systems using various types of analysis like life cycle assessment and material fl ux analysis. It is widely recognised that energy analysis following the fi rst law does not bring us much further in this context as it hardly gives any reliable indications on where to take action. Two recent measures, exergy and emergy, seem to offer the possibility of facilitating the process, by making it possible to fia common unit to both matter and energy and in addition bring in the perspectives of total environmental costs (a sort of ‘ecological footprint’ ‐ not in the strict sense) to the evaluation. The concepts may be used separately, but recent results from natural ecosystems indicate that the use of the two in combination might bring us even further in defi ning and achieving sustainable development. This in turn also allows us to construct new indicators specifi cally dedicated to and addressing the sustainability trends in the production systems or even society and may eventually be coupled to economics, at least at a micro-economic scale. The approach presented makes it possible to analyse the sustainability state of the systems in general software packages able to do a simple linear optimisation, and thus brings in the possibility of fithe most optimal way of coupling material and energetic fl uxes and thus assist in implementation of cleaner production and industrial ecology. To our knowledge, this is the fi rst time a common, unifi ed approach to the analysis of both cultural and natural ecosystems is presented.