根据环境理论,提出了一种基于能量和火用的LCA的通用框架

S. Nielsen, S. Bastianoni
{"title":"根据环境理论,提出了一种基于能量和火用的LCA的通用框架","authors":"S. Nielsen, S. Bastianoni","doi":"10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To estimate the environmental consequences of human activities with the purpose of achieving sustainable development, we need to carry out detailed analyses of the material and energy cycles of our society. The need to choose from several options is not a simple task. There are several reasons to this. First, the task contains an inherent problem of fia common unit. Second, we need a common and unifi ed methodology for matter and energy to compare results and evaluate systems using various types of analysis like life cycle assessment and material fl ux analysis. It is widely recognised that energy analysis following the fi rst law does not bring us much further in this context as it hardly gives any reliable indications on where to take action. Two recent measures, exergy and emergy, seem to offer the possibility of facilitating the process, by making it possible to fia common unit to both matter and energy and in addition bring in the perspectives of total environmental costs (a sort of ‘ecological footprint’ ‐ not in the strict sense) to the evaluation. The concepts may be used separately, but recent results from natural ecosystems indicate that the use of the two in combination might bring us even further in defi ning and achieving sustainable development. This in turn also allows us to construct new indicators specifi cally dedicated to and addressing the sustainability trends in the production systems or even society and may eventually be coupled to economics, at least at a micro-economic scale. The approach presented makes it possible to analyse the sustainability state of the systems in general software packages able to do a simple linear optimisation, and thus brings in the possibility of fithe most optimal way of coupling material and energetic fl uxes and thus assist in implementation of cleaner production and industrial ecology. To our knowledge, this is the fi rst time a common, unifi ed approach to the analysis of both cultural and natural ecosystems is presented.","PeriodicalId":13902,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","volume":"1 1","pages":"170-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A common framework for emergy and exergy based LCA in accordance with environ theory\",\"authors\":\"S. Nielsen, S. Bastianoni\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To estimate the environmental consequences of human activities with the purpose of achieving sustainable development, we need to carry out detailed analyses of the material and energy cycles of our society. The need to choose from several options is not a simple task. There are several reasons to this. First, the task contains an inherent problem of fia common unit. Second, we need a common and unifi ed methodology for matter and energy to compare results and evaluate systems using various types of analysis like life cycle assessment and material fl ux analysis. It is widely recognised that energy analysis following the fi rst law does not bring us much further in this context as it hardly gives any reliable indications on where to take action. Two recent measures, exergy and emergy, seem to offer the possibility of facilitating the process, by making it possible to fia common unit to both matter and energy and in addition bring in the perspectives of total environmental costs (a sort of ‘ecological footprint’ ‐ not in the strict sense) to the evaluation. The concepts may be used separately, but recent results from natural ecosystems indicate that the use of the two in combination might bring us even further in defi ning and achieving sustainable development. This in turn also allows us to construct new indicators specifi cally dedicated to and addressing the sustainability trends in the production systems or even society and may eventually be coupled to economics, at least at a micro-economic scale. The approach presented makes it possible to analyse the sustainability state of the systems in general software packages able to do a simple linear optimisation, and thus brings in the possibility of fithe most optimal way of coupling material and energetic fl uxes and thus assist in implementation of cleaner production and industrial ecology. To our knowledge, this is the fi rst time a common, unifi ed approach to the analysis of both cultural and natural ecosystems is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"170-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V2-N3-170-185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

为了评估人类活动对环境的影响,以实现可持续发展,我们需要对社会的物质和能源循环进行详细的分析。需要从几个选项中进行选择并不是一项简单的任务。这有几个原因。首先,该任务包含一个固有的问题,即一个共同单元。其次,我们需要一个共同和统一的物质和能量的方法来比较结果和评估系统,使用各种类型的分析,如生命周期评估和物质通量分析。人们普遍认为,在这种情况下,遵循第一定律的能量分析并不能给我们带来更多的帮助,因为它几乎没有给出任何可靠的指示,告诉我们在哪里采取行动。最近的两种测量方法,能源和能量,似乎提供了促进这一过程的可能性,通过使物质和能量的共同单位成为可能,并且将总环境成本(一种“生态足迹”-不是严格意义上的)的观点引入评估。这两个概念可以单独使用,但最近自然生态系统的结果表明,将这两个概念结合使用可能使我们在定义和实现可持续发展方面更进一步。这反过来也使我们能够构建专门用于和处理生产系统甚至社会中的可持续性趋势的新指标,并可能最终与经济相结合,至少在微观经济规模上。所提出的方法使分析系统的可持续性状态成为可能,这些系统可以在一般软件包中进行简单的线性优化,从而使材料和能量通量的最优耦合方式成为可能,从而有助于实现清洁生产和工业生态。据我们所知,这是第一次提出一种共同的、统一的方法来分析文化和自然生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A common framework for emergy and exergy based LCA in accordance with environ theory
To estimate the environmental consequences of human activities with the purpose of achieving sustainable development, we need to carry out detailed analyses of the material and energy cycles of our society. The need to choose from several options is not a simple task. There are several reasons to this. First, the task contains an inherent problem of fia common unit. Second, we need a common and unifi ed methodology for matter and energy to compare results and evaluate systems using various types of analysis like life cycle assessment and material fl ux analysis. It is widely recognised that energy analysis following the fi rst law does not bring us much further in this context as it hardly gives any reliable indications on where to take action. Two recent measures, exergy and emergy, seem to offer the possibility of facilitating the process, by making it possible to fia common unit to both matter and energy and in addition bring in the perspectives of total environmental costs (a sort of ‘ecological footprint’ ‐ not in the strict sense) to the evaluation. The concepts may be used separately, but recent results from natural ecosystems indicate that the use of the two in combination might bring us even further in defi ning and achieving sustainable development. This in turn also allows us to construct new indicators specifi cally dedicated to and addressing the sustainability trends in the production systems or even society and may eventually be coupled to economics, at least at a micro-economic scale. The approach presented makes it possible to analyse the sustainability state of the systems in general software packages able to do a simple linear optimisation, and thus brings in the possibility of fithe most optimal way of coupling material and energetic fl uxes and thus assist in implementation of cleaner production and industrial ecology. To our knowledge, this is the fi rst time a common, unifi ed approach to the analysis of both cultural and natural ecosystems is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信