管理离岸审计工作:跨越在岸和离岸审计师之间的界限

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
M. Canning, Brendan O’Dwyer, R. Boomsma
{"title":"管理离岸审计工作:跨越在岸和离岸审计师之间的界限","authors":"M. Canning, Brendan O’Dwyer, R. Boomsma","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-18-055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The offshoring of external audit work to so-called low-cost countries has become increasingly prevalent among the Big 4 professional services firms. Despite this, we have limited in-depth, contextually rich knowledge of how this form of offshoring influences audit practitioners and the audit process. Using a qualitative research approach, we unveil how and why offshoring emerges as an organizational matter which changes the way audit work is organized and perceived in a Big 4 firm context. We use the concept of boundary spanning to better understand the management and coordination of audit work across the multiple and overlapping boundaries that characterize audit offshoring arrangements. First, we demonstrate how changes in the design of offshoring processes influence the interactions between onshore and offshore auditors, thereby significantly impacting on audit work. Second, we uncover how individual \"boundary spanners\" frequently struggle to ensure the efficient and effective operation of offshoring, especially in their management of relations between onshore and offshore auditors. Third, we show how the institutionalization of boundary spanning functions in organizational structures and processes can have the unintended consequence of widening the boundaries between onshore and offshore auditors. Finally, we offer evidence of the effect of offshoring on the learning process of both onshore and offshore auditors.","PeriodicalId":48142,"journal":{"name":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing the Offshoring of Audit Work: Spanning the Boundaries Between Onshore and Offshore Auditors\",\"authors\":\"M. Canning, Brendan O’Dwyer, R. Boomsma\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/ajpt-18-055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The offshoring of external audit work to so-called low-cost countries has become increasingly prevalent among the Big 4 professional services firms. Despite this, we have limited in-depth, contextually rich knowledge of how this form of offshoring influences audit practitioners and the audit process. Using a qualitative research approach, we unveil how and why offshoring emerges as an organizational matter which changes the way audit work is organized and perceived in a Big 4 firm context. We use the concept of boundary spanning to better understand the management and coordination of audit work across the multiple and overlapping boundaries that characterize audit offshoring arrangements. First, we demonstrate how changes in the design of offshoring processes influence the interactions between onshore and offshore auditors, thereby significantly impacting on audit work. Second, we uncover how individual \\\"boundary spanners\\\" frequently struggle to ensure the efficient and effective operation of offshoring, especially in their management of relations between onshore and offshore auditors. Third, we show how the institutionalization of boundary spanning functions in organizational structures and processes can have the unintended consequence of widening the boundaries between onshore and offshore auditors. Finally, we offer evidence of the effect of offshoring on the learning process of both onshore and offshore auditors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-18-055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-18-055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在四大专业服务公司中,将外部审计工作外包到所谓的低成本国家已变得越来越普遍。尽管如此,我们对这种形式的离岸外包如何影响审计从业人员和审计过程的深入和丰富的背景知识有限。采用定性研究方法,我们揭示了离岸外包如何以及为什么作为一个组织问题出现,它改变了四大会计师事务所的审计工作组织和感知方式。我们使用边界跨越的概念来更好地理解跨多个和重叠边界的审计工作的管理和协调,这些边界是审计离岸安排的特征。首先,我们将展示离岸流程设计的变化如何影响在岸和离岸审计师之间的相互作用,从而对审计工作产生重大影响。其次,我们揭示了个人“边界跨越者”如何经常努力确保离岸外包的高效和有效运作,特别是在管理在岸和离岸审计师之间的关系方面。第三,我们展示了组织结构和流程中边界跨越功能的制度化如何产生扩大在岸和离岸审计师之间边界的意外后果。最后,我们提供了离岸外包对在岸和离岸审计师学习过程的影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing the Offshoring of Audit Work: Spanning the Boundaries Between Onshore and Offshore Auditors
The offshoring of external audit work to so-called low-cost countries has become increasingly prevalent among the Big 4 professional services firms. Despite this, we have limited in-depth, contextually rich knowledge of how this form of offshoring influences audit practitioners and the audit process. Using a qualitative research approach, we unveil how and why offshoring emerges as an organizational matter which changes the way audit work is organized and perceived in a Big 4 firm context. We use the concept of boundary spanning to better understand the management and coordination of audit work across the multiple and overlapping boundaries that characterize audit offshoring arrangements. First, we demonstrate how changes in the design of offshoring processes influence the interactions between onshore and offshore auditors, thereby significantly impacting on audit work. Second, we uncover how individual "boundary spanners" frequently struggle to ensure the efficient and effective operation of offshoring, especially in their management of relations between onshore and offshore auditors. Third, we show how the institutionalization of boundary spanning functions in organizational structures and processes can have the unintended consequence of widening the boundaries between onshore and offshore auditors. Finally, we offer evidence of the effect of offshoring on the learning process of both onshore and offshore auditors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AUDITING contains technical articles as well as news and reports on current activities of the association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信