企业信用违约掉期和债券的价格发现动态

Josephine Molleyres
{"title":"企业信用违约掉期和债券的价格发现动态","authors":"Josephine Molleyres","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2817819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper empirically analyzes in a time-varying context if the U.S. corporate Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and bond markets of 81 reference entities reflect the same information on their prices between October 2004 and December 2010. The analysis shows that the theoretical no-arbitrage relation between CDS and bond spreads holds during economic stable times, but is violated as soon as markets are exposed to economic turmoil as in the financial crisis starting in August 2007. The difference between CDS and bond spreads, called the basis, is more volatile the lower the firms are rated. The price discovery is unaffected by the reference entities' credit rating and is strongly time-varying. Nevertheless the CDS spreads lead the price discovery process. Price discovery is significantly influenced uniquely by counterparty risk only when economic risks achieve abnormal levels as during the 2007/2008 financial crisis. Other risks as interbank liquidity risk, global risk and financing costs aren't considered by CDS traders when markets are facing abnormal risks. The more the markets are exposed to counterparty risk, defined as the risk that the CDS seller defaults, the less the price discovery takes place in the CDS market and therefore the more the bond spreads tend to reflect credit risk more efficiently than the CDS spreads. Thus market participants have the tendency to abscond from the CDS market as soon as counterparty risk is elevated. Because price discovery still takes place in the CDS market, economic risks are strongly underestimated by market participants.","PeriodicalId":90732,"journal":{"name":"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Price Discovery Dynamics of Corporate Credit Default Swaps and Bonds\",\"authors\":\"Josephine Molleyres\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2817819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper empirically analyzes in a time-varying context if the U.S. corporate Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and bond markets of 81 reference entities reflect the same information on their prices between October 2004 and December 2010. The analysis shows that the theoretical no-arbitrage relation between CDS and bond spreads holds during economic stable times, but is violated as soon as markets are exposed to economic turmoil as in the financial crisis starting in August 2007. The difference between CDS and bond spreads, called the basis, is more volatile the lower the firms are rated. The price discovery is unaffected by the reference entities' credit rating and is strongly time-varying. Nevertheless the CDS spreads lead the price discovery process. Price discovery is significantly influenced uniquely by counterparty risk only when economic risks achieve abnormal levels as during the 2007/2008 financial crisis. Other risks as interbank liquidity risk, global risk and financing costs aren't considered by CDS traders when markets are facing abnormal risks. The more the markets are exposed to counterparty risk, defined as the risk that the CDS seller defaults, the less the price discovery takes place in the CDS market and therefore the more the bond spreads tend to reflect credit risk more efficiently than the CDS spreads. Thus market participants have the tendency to abscond from the CDS market as soon as counterparty risk is elevated. Because price discovery still takes place in the CDS market, economic risks are strongly underestimated by market participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对2004年10月至2010年12月期间81个参考实体的美国企业信用违约互换(CDS)和债券市场是否反映相同的价格信息进行了时变背景下的实证分析。分析表明,理论上CDS和债券利差之间的无套利关系在经济稳定时期成立,但一旦市场暴露于经济动荡(如2007年8月开始的金融危机),就会被打破。信用违约掉期和债券息差之间的差额,也就是所谓的基差,越低评级的公司越不稳定。价格发现不受参考实体信用评级的影响,并且具有很强的时变性。然而,CDS价差引领了价格发现过程。只有当经济风险达到2007/2008年金融危机期间的异常水平时,价格发现才会受到交易对手风险的显著影响。当市场面临异常风险时,CDS交易者不会考虑银行间流动性风险、全球风险和融资成本等风险。市场越是暴露于交易对手风险(定义为CDS卖方违约的风险),CDS市场上的价格发现就越少,因此债券息差往往比CDS息差更能有效地反映信用风险。因此,一旦交易对手风险升高,市场参与者就有逃离CDS市场的倾向。由于CDS市场仍然存在价格发现,市场参与者严重低估了经济风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Price Discovery Dynamics of Corporate Credit Default Swaps and Bonds
This paper empirically analyzes in a time-varying context if the U.S. corporate Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and bond markets of 81 reference entities reflect the same information on their prices between October 2004 and December 2010. The analysis shows that the theoretical no-arbitrage relation between CDS and bond spreads holds during economic stable times, but is violated as soon as markets are exposed to economic turmoil as in the financial crisis starting in August 2007. The difference between CDS and bond spreads, called the basis, is more volatile the lower the firms are rated. The price discovery is unaffected by the reference entities' credit rating and is strongly time-varying. Nevertheless the CDS spreads lead the price discovery process. Price discovery is significantly influenced uniquely by counterparty risk only when economic risks achieve abnormal levels as during the 2007/2008 financial crisis. Other risks as interbank liquidity risk, global risk and financing costs aren't considered by CDS traders when markets are facing abnormal risks. The more the markets are exposed to counterparty risk, defined as the risk that the CDS seller defaults, the less the price discovery takes place in the CDS market and therefore the more the bond spreads tend to reflect credit risk more efficiently than the CDS spreads. Thus market participants have the tendency to abscond from the CDS market as soon as counterparty risk is elevated. Because price discovery still takes place in the CDS market, economic risks are strongly underestimated by market participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信