{"title":"乳房切除术后放射治疗是否会使立即自体乳房瓣重建的结果恶化?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Belle Liew, C. Southall, M. Kanapathy, D. Nikkhah","doi":"10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere is great uncertainty regarding the practice of immediate autologous breast reconstruction (IBR) when post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated. Plastic surgery units differ in their treatment protocols, with some recommending delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) following PMRT. IBR offers significant cosmetic and psychosocial benefits; however, the morbidity of flap exposure to radiation remains unclear.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe aim of this review was to comprehensively analyze the existing literature comparing autologous flaps exposed to PMRT and flaps with no radiation exposure.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was conducted in November 2020. Primary studies comparing IBR with and without adjuvant PMRT were assessed for the following primary outcomes: clinical complications, observer-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction rates. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled risk ratios of individual complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwenty-one articles involving 3817 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data gave risk ratios for fat necrosis (RR = 1.91, p < 0.00001), secondary surgery (RR = 1.62, p = 0.03) and volume loss (RR = 8.16, p < 0.00001) favoring unirradiated flaps, but no significant difference was observed in all other reported complications. The no-PMRT group scored significantly higher in observer-reported measures. However, self-reported aesthetic and general satisfaction rates were similar between groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIBR should be offered after mastectomy to patients requiring PMRT. The higher risks of fat necrosis and contracture appear to be less clinically relevant as corroborated by positive scores from patients developing these complications. Preoperative and intraoperative measures should be taken to further optimize reconstruction and mitigate post-radiation sequel. Careful management of patients' expectations is also imperative.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nLevel III.","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does post-mastectomy radiation therapy worsen outcomes in immediate autologous breast flap reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Belle Liew, C. Southall, M. Kanapathy, D. Nikkhah\",\"doi\":\"10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThere is great uncertainty regarding the practice of immediate autologous breast reconstruction (IBR) when post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated. Plastic surgery units differ in their treatment protocols, with some recommending delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) following PMRT. IBR offers significant cosmetic and psychosocial benefits; however, the morbidity of flap exposure to radiation remains unclear.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nThe aim of this review was to comprehensively analyze the existing literature comparing autologous flaps exposed to PMRT and flaps with no radiation exposure.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was conducted in November 2020. Primary studies comparing IBR with and without adjuvant PMRT were assessed for the following primary outcomes: clinical complications, observer-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction rates. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled risk ratios of individual complications.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nTwenty-one articles involving 3817 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data gave risk ratios for fat necrosis (RR = 1.91, p < 0.00001), secondary surgery (RR = 1.62, p = 0.03) and volume loss (RR = 8.16, p < 0.00001) favoring unirradiated flaps, but no significant difference was observed in all other reported complications. The no-PMRT group scored significantly higher in observer-reported measures. However, self-reported aesthetic and general satisfaction rates were similar between groups.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nIBR should be offered after mastectomy to patients requiring PMRT. The higher risks of fat necrosis and contracture appear to be less clinically relevant as corroborated by positive scores from patients developing these complications. Preoperative and intraoperative measures should be taken to further optimize reconstruction and mitigate post-radiation sequel. Careful management of patients' expectations is also imperative.\\n\\n\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\nLevel III.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
背景:当乳房切除术后放射治疗(PMRT)指的是立即自体乳房重建(IBR)时,存在很大的不确定性。整形外科单位的治疗方案各不相同,有些建议在PMRT后进行延迟乳房重建(DBR)。IBR具有显著的美容和心理社会益处;然而,皮瓣暴露于辐射的发病率尚不清楚。目的综合分析已有文献,比较经PMRT照射的自体皮瓣与未经辐射照射的自体皮瓣。方法于2020年11月在MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库中进行综合检索。比较IBR与无辅助PMRT的初步研究评估了以下主要结果:临床并发症,观察者报告的结果和患者报告的满意度。进行荟萃分析以获得单个并发症的合并风险比。结果共纳入文献21篇,3817例患者。综合数据的荟萃分析显示,未照射皮瓣的风险比为脂肪坏死(RR = 1.91, p < 0.00001)、二次手术(RR = 1.62, p = 0.03)和体积损失(RR = 8.16, p < 0.00001),但在所有其他报道的并发症中没有观察到显著差异。无pmrt组在观察者报告的测量中得分明显更高。然而,自我报告的审美和总体满意度在两组之间是相似的。结论乳腺切除术后需要PMRT的患者应给予ibr。出现这些并发症的患者的阳性评分证实,较高的脂肪坏死和挛缩风险似乎与临床相关性较低。术前及术中应采取措施进一步优化重建,减轻放疗后后遗症。仔细管理病人的期望也是必要的。证据等级:III级。
Does post-mastectomy radiation therapy worsen outcomes in immediate autologous breast flap reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
There is great uncertainty regarding the practice of immediate autologous breast reconstruction (IBR) when post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated. Plastic surgery units differ in their treatment protocols, with some recommending delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) following PMRT. IBR offers significant cosmetic and psychosocial benefits; however, the morbidity of flap exposure to radiation remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this review was to comprehensively analyze the existing literature comparing autologous flaps exposed to PMRT and flaps with no radiation exposure.
METHODS
A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was conducted in November 2020. Primary studies comparing IBR with and without adjuvant PMRT were assessed for the following primary outcomes: clinical complications, observer-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction rates. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled risk ratios of individual complications.
RESULTS
Twenty-one articles involving 3817 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data gave risk ratios for fat necrosis (RR = 1.91, p < 0.00001), secondary surgery (RR = 1.62, p = 0.03) and volume loss (RR = 8.16, p < 0.00001) favoring unirradiated flaps, but no significant difference was observed in all other reported complications. The no-PMRT group scored significantly higher in observer-reported measures. However, self-reported aesthetic and general satisfaction rates were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION
IBR should be offered after mastectomy to patients requiring PMRT. The higher risks of fat necrosis and contracture appear to be less clinically relevant as corroborated by positive scores from patients developing these complications. Preoperative and intraoperative measures should be taken to further optimize reconstruction and mitigate post-radiation sequel. Careful management of patients' expectations is also imperative.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III.