改变观点就是改变制度——欺凌行为âÂÂStrong SituationâÂÂ

Mechthild Schäfer, Klaus Starch, Manuel Stoiber, Hannes Letsch
{"title":"改变观点就是改变制度——欺凌行为âÂÂStrong SituationâÂÂ","authors":"Mechthild Schäfer, Klaus Starch, Manuel Stoiber, Hannes Letsch","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When asked individually, a majority of pupils perceive bullying as wrong, antisocial and pronounce the necessity to do something against it. However as part of their class nine out of ten are attributed a distinct role in the bullying process by peers. Moral knowledge or competence adds little to differentiate these bullying roles, but moral motivation does. Moral motivation and in special moral disengagement is linked to a context, to the class. It is argued, that bullying needs to be defined as a strong situation to overcome the effects of group-dynamics predicted by socialpsychology.","PeriodicalId":14828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing Perspective is Changing the System-Bullying as âÂÂStrong SituationâÂÂ\",\"authors\":\"Mechthild Schäfer, Klaus Starch, Manuel Stoiber, Hannes Letsch\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6105.1000305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When asked individually, a majority of pupils perceive bullying as wrong, antisocial and pronounce the necessity to do something against it. However as part of their class nine out of ten are attributed a distinct role in the bullying process by peers. Moral knowledge or competence adds little to differentiate these bullying roles, but moral motivation does. Moral motivation and in special moral disengagement is linked to a context, to the class. It is argued, that bullying needs to be defined as a strong situation to overcome the effects of group-dynamics predicted by socialpsychology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当被单独询问时,大多数学生认为欺凌是错误的,反社会的,并认为有必要采取措施反对它。然而,作为他们班级的一部分,十分之九的人在同龄人的欺凌过程中扮演着独特的角色。道德知识或能力对这些欺凌角色的区分作用不大,但道德动机可以。道德动机,特别是道德脱离,与情境,与阶级联系在一起。本文认为,欺凌需要被定义为一种强大的情境,以克服社会心理学所预测的群体动力学效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing Perspective is Changing the System-Bullying as âÂÂStrong SituationâÂÂ
When asked individually, a majority of pupils perceive bullying as wrong, antisocial and pronounce the necessity to do something against it. However as part of their class nine out of ten are attributed a distinct role in the bullying process by peers. Moral knowledge or competence adds little to differentiate these bullying roles, but moral motivation does. Moral motivation and in special moral disengagement is linked to a context, to the class. It is argued, that bullying needs to be defined as a strong situation to overcome the effects of group-dynamics predicted by socialpsychology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信