治疗良性前列腺增生经尿道前列腺手术后膀胱过度活动症状-选择哪种药物?

IF 1.2 2区 历史学 Q3 ECONOMICS
History of Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-08-22 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_123_23
Cheng-Ling Lee, Hann-Chorng Kuo
{"title":"治疗良性前列腺增生经尿道前列腺手术后膀胱过度活动症状-选择哪种药物?","authors":"Cheng-Ling Lee, Hann-Chorng Kuo","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_123_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are often encountered in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) or transurethral incision of the prostate (TUI-P) for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Either antimuscarinics or β-3 agonist has been found effective in relieving OAB symptoms. However, urologists usually do not prescribe such medication immediately after TUR-P or TUI-P to avoid an increase in postvoid residual and risk of urinary tract infection. If OAB medication can be used and adverse events (AEs) can be reduced to minimum, patients' quality of life after bladder outlet obstruction surgery could be improved. This study compared the safety and efficacy between solifenacin and mirabegron in men undergoing TUR-P or TUI-P.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of OAB medication on the reduction in Urgency Severity Score (USS), OAB Symptoms Score (OABSS), International Prostate Symptom Score, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes in men with BPO undergoing surgical intervention. All patients could void smoothly after catheter removal and were randomly received daily solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 50 mg, or no interventions for 4 weeks. At 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively, participants' OAB symptoms and AEs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 men were enrolled in this study with a mean age of 70.8 ± 6.1 years. At 2 weeks postoperatively, USS (1.56 ± 1.72 vs. 2.39 ± 1.72 vs. 2.26 ± 1.73, <i>P</i> < 0.011) and OABSS (5.33 ± 3.65 vs. 7.67 ± 4.19 vs. 8.58 ± 4.31, <i>P</i> < 0.000) were significantly reduced in patients taking solifenacin, mirabegron, or control, respectively. Two patients in the solifenacin group developed urinary retention. However, the changes of variables at 4 weeks postoperatively were insignificant among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Solifenacin and mirabegron are two different drug classes both equally effective in treating immediate OAB symptoms after TUR-P or TUI-P. However, OAB symptoms could be relieved at 4 weeks without any medication. Considering AEs, β-3 agonist has a more favorable safety profile than antimuscarinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47043,"journal":{"name":"History of Political Economy","volume":"46 1","pages":"312-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treating overactive bladder symptoms after transurethral prostatic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia - Which medication to choose?\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Ling Lee, Hann-Chorng Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_123_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are often encountered in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) or transurethral incision of the prostate (TUI-P) for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Either antimuscarinics or β-3 agonist has been found effective in relieving OAB symptoms. However, urologists usually do not prescribe such medication immediately after TUR-P or TUI-P to avoid an increase in postvoid residual and risk of urinary tract infection. If OAB medication can be used and adverse events (AEs) can be reduced to minimum, patients' quality of life after bladder outlet obstruction surgery could be improved. This study compared the safety and efficacy between solifenacin and mirabegron in men undergoing TUR-P or TUI-P.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of OAB medication on the reduction in Urgency Severity Score (USS), OAB Symptoms Score (OABSS), International Prostate Symptom Score, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes in men with BPO undergoing surgical intervention. All patients could void smoothly after catheter removal and were randomly received daily solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 50 mg, or no interventions for 4 weeks. At 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively, participants' OAB symptoms and AEs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 men were enrolled in this study with a mean age of 70.8 ± 6.1 years. At 2 weeks postoperatively, USS (1.56 ± 1.72 vs. 2.39 ± 1.72 vs. 2.26 ± 1.73, <i>P</i> < 0.011) and OABSS (5.33 ± 3.65 vs. 7.67 ± 4.19 vs. 8.58 ± 4.31, <i>P</i> < 0.000) were significantly reduced in patients taking solifenacin, mirabegron, or control, respectively. Two patients in the solifenacin group developed urinary retention. However, the changes of variables at 4 weeks postoperatively were insignificant among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Solifenacin and mirabegron are two different drug classes both equally effective in treating immediate OAB symptoms after TUR-P or TUI-P. However, OAB symptoms could be relieved at 4 weeks without any medication. Considering AEs, β-3 agonist has a more favorable safety profile than antimuscarinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"312-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_123_23\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_123_23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:膀胱过动(OAB)症状是经尿道前列腺切除术(turp)或经尿道前列腺切开(TUI-P)治疗良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)后常见的症状。抗毒蕈素或β-3激动剂均可有效缓解OAB症状。然而,泌尿科医生通常不会在turp或TUI-P后立即开这种药,以避免增加尿后残留和尿路感染的风险。如果能够使用OAB药物,并将不良事件(ae)降低到最低,则可以改善膀胱出口梗阻手术后患者的生活质量。本研究比较了索利那新和米拉贝龙在turp或TUI-P患者中的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:这项前瞻性随机试验比较了OAB药物对外科手术治疗的BPO患者急症严重程度评分(USS)、OAB症状评分(OABSS)、国际前列腺症状评分(International Prostate Symptom Score)和急症尿失禁发作降低的安全性和有效性。所有患者拔除导管后均能顺利排空,随机给予每日索利那新5 mg、米拉比格隆50 mg,或不干预4周。在术后2周和4周,评估参与者的OAB症状和ae。结果:共有57名男性入组,平均年龄70.8±6.1岁。术后2周,索利那新、米拉比格龙和对照组的USS(1.56±1.72∶2.39±1.72∶2.26±1.73,P < 0.011)和OABSS(5.33±3.65∶7.67±4.19∶8.58±4.31,P < 0.000)分别显著降低。索利那新组2例患者出现尿潴留。但三组术后4周各项指标变化均不显著。结论:索利那新与mirabegron是治疗turp或TUI-P术后即刻OAB症状的两种不同药物类别。然而,在没有任何药物的情况下,OAB症状可以在4周后缓解。考虑到ae, β-3激动剂比抗毒蕈素具有更有利的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treating overactive bladder symptoms after transurethral prostatic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia - Which medication to choose?

Objectives: Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are often encountered in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) or transurethral incision of the prostate (TUI-P) for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Either antimuscarinics or β-3 agonist has been found effective in relieving OAB symptoms. However, urologists usually do not prescribe such medication immediately after TUR-P or TUI-P to avoid an increase in postvoid residual and risk of urinary tract infection. If OAB medication can be used and adverse events (AEs) can be reduced to minimum, patients' quality of life after bladder outlet obstruction surgery could be improved. This study compared the safety and efficacy between solifenacin and mirabegron in men undergoing TUR-P or TUI-P.

Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of OAB medication on the reduction in Urgency Severity Score (USS), OAB Symptoms Score (OABSS), International Prostate Symptom Score, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes in men with BPO undergoing surgical intervention. All patients could void smoothly after catheter removal and were randomly received daily solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 50 mg, or no interventions for 4 weeks. At 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively, participants' OAB symptoms and AEs were evaluated.

Results: A total of 57 men were enrolled in this study with a mean age of 70.8 ± 6.1 years. At 2 weeks postoperatively, USS (1.56 ± 1.72 vs. 2.39 ± 1.72 vs. 2.26 ± 1.73, P < 0.011) and OABSS (5.33 ± 3.65 vs. 7.67 ± 4.19 vs. 8.58 ± 4.31, P < 0.000) were significantly reduced in patients taking solifenacin, mirabegron, or control, respectively. Two patients in the solifenacin group developed urinary retention. However, the changes of variables at 4 weeks postoperatively were insignificant among the three groups.

Conclusion: Solifenacin and mirabegron are two different drug classes both equally effective in treating immediate OAB symptoms after TUR-P or TUI-P. However, OAB symptoms could be relieved at 4 weeks without any medication. Considering AEs, β-3 agonist has a more favorable safety profile than antimuscarinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Focusing on the history of economic thought and analysis, History of Political Economy has made significant contributions to the field and remains its foremost means of communication. In addition to book reviews, each issue contains original research on the development of economic thought, the historical background behind major figures in the history of economics, the interpretation of economic theories, and the methodologies available to historians of economic theory. All subscribers to History of Political Economy receive a hardbound annual supplement as part of their subscription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信