探索知识与教育的历史:导论

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Björn Lundberg
{"title":"探索知识与教育的历史:导论","authors":"Björn Lundberg","doi":"10.36368/njedh.v9i2.350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nordic Journal of Educational History 2022. © Björn Lundberg. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). In the last few years, the history of knowledge has emerged as a rapidly growing subfield of historical inquiry, with the establishment of new research centres as well as the publication of journals, books, and special issues of academic journals.1 To a certain extent, the desire to address the role of knowledge in the past can be viewed in light of contemporary social and political processes. A new digital public sphere has shaken the epistemological pillars of democracies in the Nordic countries and the Western world at large. The information superhighway of the Internet has become crowded with vehicles of disinformation, a turn of events few predicted 25 years ago. This course of events has provoked new academic interest in the social and political dynamics of knowledge in society. Concepts like fake news and alternative facts have become symbols of this full-on attack on established notions of truth-seeking, but disinformation and knowledge resistance go far beyond the political spin of populist politicians. As Robert N. Proctor has pointed out, knowledge (or the lack thereof) should clearly not be understood simply in cumulative terms, but rather as a complex social and cultural phenomenon.2 As such, knowledge has a history, or histories, which conveys important insights for the present. However, the sudden rise of knowledge as a key concern for social activists and policymakers is not the exclusive reason that the history of knowledge has expanded so rapidly in scholarly circles. It has also proved fruitful in its integrative capacities within academia, bringing together scholars from different backgrounds to address new problems. As Johan Östling, David Larsson Heidenblad and Anna Nilsson","PeriodicalId":36653,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Educational History","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Histories of Knowledge and Education: An Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Björn Lundberg\",\"doi\":\"10.36368/njedh.v9i2.350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nordic Journal of Educational History 2022. © Björn Lundberg. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). In the last few years, the history of knowledge has emerged as a rapidly growing subfield of historical inquiry, with the establishment of new research centres as well as the publication of journals, books, and special issues of academic journals.1 To a certain extent, the desire to address the role of knowledge in the past can be viewed in light of contemporary social and political processes. A new digital public sphere has shaken the epistemological pillars of democracies in the Nordic countries and the Western world at large. The information superhighway of the Internet has become crowded with vehicles of disinformation, a turn of events few predicted 25 years ago. This course of events has provoked new academic interest in the social and political dynamics of knowledge in society. Concepts like fake news and alternative facts have become symbols of this full-on attack on established notions of truth-seeking, but disinformation and knowledge resistance go far beyond the political spin of populist politicians. As Robert N. Proctor has pointed out, knowledge (or the lack thereof) should clearly not be understood simply in cumulative terms, but rather as a complex social and cultural phenomenon.2 As such, knowledge has a history, or histories, which conveys important insights for the present. However, the sudden rise of knowledge as a key concern for social activists and policymakers is not the exclusive reason that the history of knowledge has expanded so rapidly in scholarly circles. It has also proved fruitful in its integrative capacities within academia, bringing together scholars from different backgrounds to address new problems. As Johan Östling, David Larsson Heidenblad and Anna Nilsson\",\"PeriodicalId\":36653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Educational History\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Educational History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v9i2.350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Educational History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v9i2.350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

北欧教育史杂志2022。©Björn Lundberg。这是一篇基于知识共享CC-BY4.0许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)的开放获取文章。在过去的几年中,随着新的研究中心的建立以及期刊、书籍和学术期刊特刊的出版,知识的历史已经成为历史研究的一个迅速发展的分支领域在某种程度上,解决知识在过去的作用的愿望可以根据当代社会和政治进程来看待。一个新的数字公共领域已经动摇了北欧国家和整个西方世界民主的认识论支柱。互联网的信息高速公路已经挤满了传播虚假信息的工具,这是25年前很少有人预料到的情况。这一系列事件引发了学术界对社会知识的社会和政治动态的新兴趣。像假新闻和另类事实这样的概念已经成为对既定真理寻求概念的全面攻击的象征,但虚假信息和对知识的抵制远远超出了民粹主义政客的政治造势。正如罗伯特·n·普罗克特所指出的那样,知识(或缺乏知识)显然不应简单地从积累的角度来理解,而应将其视为一种复杂的社会和文化现象因此,知识有一个或多个历史,它传达了对当前的重要见解。然而,知识的突然崛起成为社会活动家和政策制定者关注的关键问题,并不是知识史在学术界迅速扩张的唯一原因。它在学术界的整合能力方面也取得了丰硕的成果,汇集了来自不同背景的学者来解决新问题。饰演约翰Östling,大卫·拉尔森·海德布莱德和安娜·尼尔森
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Histories of Knowledge and Education: An Introduction
Nordic Journal of Educational History 2022. © Björn Lundberg. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). In the last few years, the history of knowledge has emerged as a rapidly growing subfield of historical inquiry, with the establishment of new research centres as well as the publication of journals, books, and special issues of academic journals.1 To a certain extent, the desire to address the role of knowledge in the past can be viewed in light of contemporary social and political processes. A new digital public sphere has shaken the epistemological pillars of democracies in the Nordic countries and the Western world at large. The information superhighway of the Internet has become crowded with vehicles of disinformation, a turn of events few predicted 25 years ago. This course of events has provoked new academic interest in the social and political dynamics of knowledge in society. Concepts like fake news and alternative facts have become symbols of this full-on attack on established notions of truth-seeking, but disinformation and knowledge resistance go far beyond the political spin of populist politicians. As Robert N. Proctor has pointed out, knowledge (or the lack thereof) should clearly not be understood simply in cumulative terms, but rather as a complex social and cultural phenomenon.2 As such, knowledge has a history, or histories, which conveys important insights for the present. However, the sudden rise of knowledge as a key concern for social activists and policymakers is not the exclusive reason that the history of knowledge has expanded so rapidly in scholarly circles. It has also proved fruitful in its integrative capacities within academia, bringing together scholars from different backgrounds to address new problems. As Johan Östling, David Larsson Heidenblad and Anna Nilsson
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Educational History
Nordic Journal of Educational History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信