{"title":"文学资本主义:爱伦·坡作品的材料重读","authors":"Jonathan Elmer","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-6095.2001.tb00133.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a specter haunting contemporary literary studies-the specter of a surplus of interpretation. In the May 2000 issue of PMLA, Lindsay Waters, editor at Harvard University Press, argues that, despite the steady decrease of sales and despite the fact that normally “publishers resist producing books that people are unwilling to purchase or to insist that their institutional libraries purchase,” the overproduction of books has persisted for many years now because the political economy of academic publishing knows pressures more profound than the bottom line:","PeriodicalId":40386,"journal":{"name":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","volume":"23 1","pages":"65 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literary Capitalism: A Material Rereading of Poe\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Elmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1754-6095.2001.tb00133.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a specter haunting contemporary literary studies-the specter of a surplus of interpretation. In the May 2000 issue of PMLA, Lindsay Waters, editor at Harvard University Press, argues that, despite the steady decrease of sales and despite the fact that normally “publishers resist producing books that people are unwilling to purchase or to insist that their institutional libraries purchase,” the overproduction of books has persisted for many years now because the political economy of academic publishing knows pressures more profound than the bottom line:\",\"PeriodicalId\":40386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"65 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-6095.2001.tb00133.x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-6095.2001.tb00133.x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
There is a specter haunting contemporary literary studies-the specter of a surplus of interpretation. In the May 2000 issue of PMLA, Lindsay Waters, editor at Harvard University Press, argues that, despite the steady decrease of sales and despite the fact that normally “publishers resist producing books that people are unwilling to purchase or to insist that their institutional libraries purchase,” the overproduction of books has persisted for many years now because the political economy of academic publishing knows pressures more profound than the bottom line: