V. Koikov, A. Akanov, A. Abduazhitova, A. Aubakirova, D. Otargalieva
{"title":"评价哈萨克斯坦共和国医科大学和研究组织的研究和创新活动的有效性","authors":"V. Koikov, A. Akanov, A. Abduazhitova, A. Aubakirova, D. Otargalieva","doi":"10.32921/2225-9929-2021-1-41-4-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the existing achievements of individual organizations, the effectiveness of the majority of Kazakhstani medical universities and research organizations continues to remain at a low level. By order of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 23, 2020 №ҚР DSM-316/2020, the rules for assessing the effectiveness of research and innovative activities (RIA) were approved. As part of the implementation of the new Rules for assessing RIA, we assessed the performance of RIA of medical universities and reaearch organizations of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020, as well as an assessment of the dynamics of key indicators of RIA for the period from 2018 to 2020. When evaluating RIA of medical universities and resraerch organizations, the following key indicators were taken into account: The volume of profit from scientific research, The number of publications in the Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Springer, Citation of scientific works, The number of patents and other titles of protection (in which, as a patent holder the organization itself is indicated), The level of commercialization of the RIA results, The level of participation in international conferences and forums. The assessment of the effectiveness of the RIA of Kazakhstani medical universities, research organizations over the past 3 years has revealed such positive aspects as an increase in the number of articles published annually in scientific journals indexed in authoritative databases by 44.4%, an increase in the share of publications of Kazakhstani authors in high-ranking journals (Q1-Q2) from 25.6% to 48.8%, an increase in the share of employees with the Hirsch index according to WoS / Scopus - from 7.7% to 10.2%, an increase in the average Hirsch index according to WoS / Scopus - from 0.15 to 0.18, an increase in the patent activity medical universities and research organizations - by 17.8%, an increase in the volume of profit received annually from the commercialization of research results - by 99.7%. On the other hand, there is a low activity of a fairly large share of domestic medical universities and research organizations in the field of science in terms of individual indicators. Taking into account the results of the study, further steps were proposed for the development of medical science in the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as measures, the implementation of which is required at the level of medical universities and research organizations. Keywords: scientific and innovative activities, indicators of science, rating, medical science","PeriodicalId":11852,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effectiveness of research and innovative activities of medical universities and research organizations of the Republic of Kazakhstan\",\"authors\":\"V. Koikov, A. Akanov, A. Abduazhitova, A. Aubakirova, D. Otargalieva\",\"doi\":\"10.32921/2225-9929-2021-1-41-4-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the existing achievements of individual organizations, the effectiveness of the majority of Kazakhstani medical universities and research organizations continues to remain at a low level. By order of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 23, 2020 №ҚР DSM-316/2020, the rules for assessing the effectiveness of research and innovative activities (RIA) were approved. As part of the implementation of the new Rules for assessing RIA, we assessed the performance of RIA of medical universities and reaearch organizations of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020, as well as an assessment of the dynamics of key indicators of RIA for the period from 2018 to 2020. When evaluating RIA of medical universities and resraerch organizations, the following key indicators were taken into account: The volume of profit from scientific research, The number of publications in the Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Springer, Citation of scientific works, The number of patents and other titles of protection (in which, as a patent holder the organization itself is indicated), The level of commercialization of the RIA results, The level of participation in international conferences and forums. The assessment of the effectiveness of the RIA of Kazakhstani medical universities, research organizations over the past 3 years has revealed such positive aspects as an increase in the number of articles published annually in scientific journals indexed in authoritative databases by 44.4%, an increase in the share of publications of Kazakhstani authors in high-ranking journals (Q1-Q2) from 25.6% to 48.8%, an increase in the share of employees with the Hirsch index according to WoS / Scopus - from 7.7% to 10.2%, an increase in the average Hirsch index according to WoS / Scopus - from 0.15 to 0.18, an increase in the patent activity medical universities and research organizations - by 17.8%, an increase in the volume of profit received annually from the commercialization of research results - by 99.7%. On the other hand, there is a low activity of a fairly large share of domestic medical universities and research organizations in the field of science in terms of individual indicators. Taking into account the results of the study, further steps were proposed for the development of medical science in the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as measures, the implementation of which is required at the level of medical universities and research organizations. Keywords: scientific and innovative activities, indicators of science, rating, medical science\",\"PeriodicalId\":11852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2021-1-41-4-21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2021-1-41-4-21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管个别组织取得了成就,但哈萨克斯坦大多数医科大学和研究组织的效率仍然处于较低水平。根据哈萨克斯坦共和国卫生部2020年12月23日№ҚР DSM-316/2020的命令,批准了评估研究和创新活动(RIA)有效性的规则。作为实施新RIA评估规则的一部分,我们评估了哈萨克斯坦共和国医科大学和研究机构的2020年RIA绩效,以及评估了2018年至2020年期间RIA关键指标的动态。在评估医学院校和研究机构的RIA时,主要考虑以下关键指标:科学研究的利润额,在Web of Science (WoS)、Scopus、施普林格上发表的出版物数量,科学著作的引用数量,专利和其他保护标题的数量(其中,作为专利持有人的组织本身被指出),RIA成果的商业化水平,参与国际会议和论坛的水平。在过去三年中,对哈萨克斯坦医科大学和研究机构的RIA的有效性进行的评估显示出一些积极的方面,如在权威数据库索引的科学期刊上每年发表的文章数量增加了44.4%,哈萨克斯坦作者在高级期刊上发表的文章比例(第一至第二季度)从25.6%增加到48.8%。根据WoS / Scopus统计,拥有Hirsch指数的员工比例从7.7%增加到10.2%;根据WoS / Scopus统计,平均Hirsch指数从0.15增加到0.18;医科大学和研究机构的专利活动增加了17.8%;每年从研究成果商业化中获得的利润增加了99.7%。另一方面,就个别指标而言,相当大比例的国内医科大学和研究机构在科学领域的活跃程度很低。考虑到这项研究的结果,提出了进一步发展哈萨克斯坦共和国医学科学的步骤,以及在医科大学和研究组织一级需要实施的措施。关键词:科技创新活动,科学指标,评级,医学科学
Evaluation of the effectiveness of research and innovative activities of medical universities and research organizations of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Despite the existing achievements of individual organizations, the effectiveness of the majority of Kazakhstani medical universities and research organizations continues to remain at a low level. By order of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 23, 2020 №ҚР DSM-316/2020, the rules for assessing the effectiveness of research and innovative activities (RIA) were approved. As part of the implementation of the new Rules for assessing RIA, we assessed the performance of RIA of medical universities and reaearch organizations of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020, as well as an assessment of the dynamics of key indicators of RIA for the period from 2018 to 2020. When evaluating RIA of medical universities and resraerch organizations, the following key indicators were taken into account: The volume of profit from scientific research, The number of publications in the Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Springer, Citation of scientific works, The number of patents and other titles of protection (in which, as a patent holder the organization itself is indicated), The level of commercialization of the RIA results, The level of participation in international conferences and forums. The assessment of the effectiveness of the RIA of Kazakhstani medical universities, research organizations over the past 3 years has revealed such positive aspects as an increase in the number of articles published annually in scientific journals indexed in authoritative databases by 44.4%, an increase in the share of publications of Kazakhstani authors in high-ranking journals (Q1-Q2) from 25.6% to 48.8%, an increase in the share of employees with the Hirsch index according to WoS / Scopus - from 7.7% to 10.2%, an increase in the average Hirsch index according to WoS / Scopus - from 0.15 to 0.18, an increase in the patent activity medical universities and research organizations - by 17.8%, an increase in the volume of profit received annually from the commercialization of research results - by 99.7%. On the other hand, there is a low activity of a fairly large share of domestic medical universities and research organizations in the field of science in terms of individual indicators. Taking into account the results of the study, further steps were proposed for the development of medical science in the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as measures, the implementation of which is required at the level of medical universities and research organizations. Keywords: scientific and innovative activities, indicators of science, rating, medical science
期刊介绍:
The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development is a multi and interdisciplinary platform that provides space for public health experts in academics, policy and programs to share empirical evidence to contribute to health development agenda.
We publish original research articles, reviews, brief communications and commentaries on public health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to the scholars in the field of public health, social sciences and humanities, health practitioners and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of public health from a wide range of fields: epidemiology, environmental health, health economics, reproductive health, behavioral sciences, nutrition, psychiatry, social pharmacy, medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychology and wide arrays of social sciences and humanities.
The journal publishes the following types of contribution:
1) Peer-reviewed original research articles and critical or analytical reviews in any area of social public health. These papers may be up to 3,500 words excluding abstract, tables, and references. Papers below this limit are preferred.
2) Peer-reviewed short reports of research findings on topical issues or published articles of between 2000 and 4000 words.
3) Brief communications, and commentaries debating on particular areas of focus, and published alongside, selected articles.
4) Special Issues bringing together collections of papers on a particular theme, and usually guest edited.
5) Editorial that flags critical issues of public health debate for policy, program and scientific consumption or further debate