建议:建立一个真相市场,以解决社交媒体上的虚假广告

Commun. ACM Pub Date : 2020-03-28 DOI:10.1145/3401724
Marshall W. Van Alstyne
{"title":"建议:建立一个真相市场,以解决社交媒体上的虚假广告","authors":"Marshall W. Van Alstyne","doi":"10.1145/3401724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At one extreme, Twitter rejects all political ads no matter how important the message. At the other extreme, Facebook accepts all political ads no matter how untruthful the message. As lies in political advertising become increasingly problematic, neither policy works. The former prevents us from hearing newcomers while the latter pollutes our discourse with misinformation.\r\n\r\nThis short article proposes a \"market for truth\" that would allow social media platforms to take political ads, guarantee the ads are lie free, and at the same time absolve such platforms of responsibility for deciding what's true. Using mechanism design, it causes advertisers to either internalize their negative externalities or to signal that they are untrustworthy. It also provides a business model that should make fact-checking scalable and profitable.\r\n\r\nThis short precis is a segment of a longer treatise on the problem of fake news.","PeriodicalId":10645,"journal":{"name":"Commun. ACM","volume":"15 1","pages":"23-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal: a market for truth to address false ads on social media\",\"authors\":\"Marshall W. Van Alstyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3401724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At one extreme, Twitter rejects all political ads no matter how important the message. At the other extreme, Facebook accepts all political ads no matter how untruthful the message. As lies in political advertising become increasingly problematic, neither policy works. The former prevents us from hearing newcomers while the latter pollutes our discourse with misinformation.\\r\\n\\r\\nThis short article proposes a \\\"market for truth\\\" that would allow social media platforms to take political ads, guarantee the ads are lie free, and at the same time absolve such platforms of responsibility for deciding what's true. Using mechanism design, it causes advertisers to either internalize their negative externalities or to signal that they are untrustworthy. It also provides a business model that should make fact-checking scalable and profitable.\\r\\n\\r\\nThis short precis is a segment of a longer treatise on the problem of fake news.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Commun. ACM\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"23-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Commun. ACM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3401724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commun. ACM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3401724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在一个极端,推特拒绝所有政治广告,不管信息有多重要。在另一个极端,Facebook接受所有政治广告,不管信息多么不真实。随着政治广告中的谎言变得越来越成问题,这两种政策都不起作用。前者使我们听不到新来者的声音,而后者则用错误的信息污染了我们的话语。这篇短文提出了一个“真相市场”,允许社交媒体平台接受政治广告,保证广告没有谎言,同时免除这些平台决定什么是真实的责任。利用机制设计,它使广告商要么内化他们的负外部性,要么发出他们不值得信任的信号。它还提供了一种商业模式,使事实核查可扩展且有利可图。这篇短文是一篇关于假新闻问题的长篇论文的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proposal: a market for truth to address false ads on social media
At one extreme, Twitter rejects all political ads no matter how important the message. At the other extreme, Facebook accepts all political ads no matter how untruthful the message. As lies in political advertising become increasingly problematic, neither policy works. The former prevents us from hearing newcomers while the latter pollutes our discourse with misinformation. This short article proposes a "market for truth" that would allow social media platforms to take political ads, guarantee the ads are lie free, and at the same time absolve such platforms of responsibility for deciding what's true. Using mechanism design, it causes advertisers to either internalize their negative externalities or to signal that they are untrustworthy. It also provides a business model that should make fact-checking scalable and profitable. This short precis is a segment of a longer treatise on the problem of fake news.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信