超大口径弯月镜支撑点布局-刚度-校正力联合优化

Q3 Engineering
习兴华, 张超杰, 胡海飞, 关英俊
{"title":"超大口径弯月镜支撑点布局-刚度-校正力联合优化","authors":"习兴华, 张超杰, 胡海飞, 关英俊","doi":"10.12086/OEE.2020.190551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Passive hydraulic support units (PHSUs) are frequently used in the in-situ fabrication and testing (in-situ support). However, the difference in PHSUs' stiffness will affect the mirror surface figure, especially for those thin meniscus mirrors. In order to solve this problem, the joint optimization method of layout, stiffness and active correction is studied. Firstly, for the difference of PHUS' stiffness, a hierarchical layout optimization method for support stiffness and support position is proposed to obtain the initial optimization solution of the support system. Then, the mode calibration method and the least square method is used for active correction of support system to obtain the final optimized solution of the mirror surface figure. Finally, the effectiveness of the method is verified by a numerical simulation experiment with specific cases. The results show that, for 4 m thin meniscus mirror, after layout optimization, with the hydraulic passive support system, the root mean square (RMS) of the mirror surface errors of 60 point axial support system is reduced from 150.6 nm to 32.9 nm, and the RMS value of the mirror surface errors of 78 point axial support system is reduced from 45.2 nm to 22.6 nm. The optimization effect is remarkable. After active correction, the RMS value of the mirror surface errors of 60 point axial support system is 14.6 nm, and it is 6.9 nm for 78 point axial support system. The requirement of the RMS value of the mirror surface error is less than λ/40 (λ=632.8 nm). The support systems meet the requirement. Finally, the 60 point axial support system was selected. Through the joint optimization of layout, stiffness and active correction for supporting points, it can greatly increase the applicability, flexibility and reduce the difficulty of implementation for the in-situ support system.","PeriodicalId":39552,"journal":{"name":"光电工程","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"超大口径弯月镜支撑点布局-刚度-校正力联合优化\",\"authors\":\"习兴华, 张超杰, 胡海飞, 关英俊\",\"doi\":\"10.12086/OEE.2020.190551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Passive hydraulic support units (PHSUs) are frequently used in the in-situ fabrication and testing (in-situ support). However, the difference in PHSUs' stiffness will affect the mirror surface figure, especially for those thin meniscus mirrors. In order to solve this problem, the joint optimization method of layout, stiffness and active correction is studied. Firstly, for the difference of PHUS' stiffness, a hierarchical layout optimization method for support stiffness and support position is proposed to obtain the initial optimization solution of the support system. Then, the mode calibration method and the least square method is used for active correction of support system to obtain the final optimized solution of the mirror surface figure. Finally, the effectiveness of the method is verified by a numerical simulation experiment with specific cases. The results show that, for 4 m thin meniscus mirror, after layout optimization, with the hydraulic passive support system, the root mean square (RMS) of the mirror surface errors of 60 point axial support system is reduced from 150.6 nm to 32.9 nm, and the RMS value of the mirror surface errors of 78 point axial support system is reduced from 45.2 nm to 22.6 nm. The optimization effect is remarkable. After active correction, the RMS value of the mirror surface errors of 60 point axial support system is 14.6 nm, and it is 6.9 nm for 78 point axial support system. The requirement of the RMS value of the mirror surface error is less than λ/40 (λ=632.8 nm). The support systems meet the requirement. Finally, the 60 point axial support system was selected. Through the joint optimization of layout, stiffness and active correction for supporting points, it can greatly increase the applicability, flexibility and reduce the difficulty of implementation for the in-situ support system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"光电工程\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"光电工程\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12086/OEE.2020.190551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"光电工程","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12086/OEE.2020.190551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被动液压支架(phsu)是现场制造和测试(现场支架)中经常使用的一种支架。然而,phsu刚度的差异会影响镜面形状,特别是对于那些较薄的半月板镜。为解决这一问题,研究了节点布置、刚度和主动修正的优化方法。首先,针对PHUS刚度的差异,提出了基于支撑刚度和支撑位置的分层布局优化方法,得到了支撑系统的初始优化解;然后,利用模态定标法和最小二乘法对支撑系统进行主动校正,得到镜面图形的最终优化解。最后,通过具体案例的数值模拟实验验证了该方法的有效性。结果表明,对于4 m薄半月板反射镜,采用液压被动支撑系统后,60点轴向支撑系统镜面误差的均方根值(RMS)从150.6 nm减小到32.9 nm, 78点轴向支撑系统镜面误差的均方根值(RMS)从45.2 nm减小到22.6 nm。优化效果显著。主动校正后,60点轴向支撑系统镜面误差的RMS值为14.6 nm, 78点轴向支撑系统镜面误差的RMS值为6.9 nm。要求镜面误差的均方根值小于λ/40 (λ=632.8 nm)。支撑体系满足要求。最终选定了60点轴向支撑体系。通过对支撑点布置、刚度和主动校正的联合优化,可大大提高原位支护体系的适用性、灵活性和降低实施难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
超大口径弯月镜支撑点布局-刚度-校正力联合优化
Passive hydraulic support units (PHSUs) are frequently used in the in-situ fabrication and testing (in-situ support). However, the difference in PHSUs' stiffness will affect the mirror surface figure, especially for those thin meniscus mirrors. In order to solve this problem, the joint optimization method of layout, stiffness and active correction is studied. Firstly, for the difference of PHUS' stiffness, a hierarchical layout optimization method for support stiffness and support position is proposed to obtain the initial optimization solution of the support system. Then, the mode calibration method and the least square method is used for active correction of support system to obtain the final optimized solution of the mirror surface figure. Finally, the effectiveness of the method is verified by a numerical simulation experiment with specific cases. The results show that, for 4 m thin meniscus mirror, after layout optimization, with the hydraulic passive support system, the root mean square (RMS) of the mirror surface errors of 60 point axial support system is reduced from 150.6 nm to 32.9 nm, and the RMS value of the mirror surface errors of 78 point axial support system is reduced from 45.2 nm to 22.6 nm. The optimization effect is remarkable. After active correction, the RMS value of the mirror surface errors of 60 point axial support system is 14.6 nm, and it is 6.9 nm for 78 point axial support system. The requirement of the RMS value of the mirror surface error is less than λ/40 (λ=632.8 nm). The support systems meet the requirement. Finally, the 60 point axial support system was selected. Through the joint optimization of layout, stiffness and active correction for supporting points, it can greatly increase the applicability, flexibility and reduce the difficulty of implementation for the in-situ support system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
光电工程
光电工程 Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6622
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信