人工耳蜗使用者声学变化检测能力评价

IF 0.7 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Eylem Saraç Kaya, M. D. Türkyılmaz, M. Yaralı
{"title":"人工耳蜗使用者声学变化检测能力评价","authors":"Eylem Saraç Kaya, M. D. Türkyılmaz, M. Yaralı","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2022.2142390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between behaviourally acquired Acoustic Change Detection Test (ACDT) responses and electrophysiologically obtained Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) responses in participants with Cochlear Implant (CI). Methods 28 unilateral adult CI users (mean age 41) participated in the study. In behavioural test session, ACDT and speech tests were administered. In electrophysiological test session, sound onset and ACC responses of participants stimulated by/ui/speech structure were recorded and N1–P2 peak-to-peak amplitude and N1 latencies were determined. Results No significant correlation was found between individuals’ behavioural and electrophysiological responses but it was observed that individuals dived into two clusters in terms of ACDT responses (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean ACC amplitudes of the clusters. No statistically significant difference was observed between the mean ACC N1 latency findings of the clusters, suggesting that ACC amplitude may be a better predictor than latency in auditory discrimination. Conclusion ACC measurement may be a potential clinical tool to evaluate auditory discrimination performance in individuals with CI, but using the electrophysiological and behavioural tests together may provide a more holistic perspective.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":"475 1","pages":"130 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evaluation of cochlear implant users’ acoustic change detection ability\",\"authors\":\"Eylem Saraç Kaya, M. D. Türkyılmaz, M. Yaralı\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21695717.2022.2142390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between behaviourally acquired Acoustic Change Detection Test (ACDT) responses and electrophysiologically obtained Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) responses in participants with Cochlear Implant (CI). Methods 28 unilateral adult CI users (mean age 41) participated in the study. In behavioural test session, ACDT and speech tests were administered. In electrophysiological test session, sound onset and ACC responses of participants stimulated by/ui/speech structure were recorded and N1–P2 peak-to-peak amplitude and N1 latencies were determined. Results No significant correlation was found between individuals’ behavioural and electrophysiological responses but it was observed that individuals dived into two clusters in terms of ACDT responses (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean ACC amplitudes of the clusters. No statistically significant difference was observed between the mean ACC N1 latency findings of the clusters, suggesting that ACC amplitude may be a better predictor than latency in auditory discrimination. Conclusion ACC measurement may be a potential clinical tool to evaluate auditory discrimination performance in individuals with CI, but using the electrophysiological and behavioural tests together may provide a more holistic perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"volume\":\"475 1\",\"pages\":\"130 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2142390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2142390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的研究人工耳蜗(CI)受试者行为获得性声学变化检测测试(ACDT)反应与电生理获得的声学变化复合体(ACC)反应之间的关系。方法28例单侧成人CI使用者(平均年龄41岁)参与研究。在行为测试阶段,进行ACDT和言语测试。在电生理测试阶段,记录被试在/ui/语音结构刺激下的声起反应和ACC反应,测定N1 - p2峰间振幅和N1潜伏期。结果个体的行为与电生理反应无显著相关,但个体的ACDT反应分为两类(p < 0.05)。在聚类的平均ACC振幅之间发现有统计学意义的差异。各组间平均ACC N1潜伏期差异无统计学意义,提示ACC振幅可能比潜伏期更能预测听觉辨别。结论ACC测量可能是评估CI患者听觉辨别表现的潜在临床工具,但将电生理和行为测试结合使用可能提供更全面的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The evaluation of cochlear implant users’ acoustic change detection ability
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between behaviourally acquired Acoustic Change Detection Test (ACDT) responses and electrophysiologically obtained Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) responses in participants with Cochlear Implant (CI). Methods 28 unilateral adult CI users (mean age 41) participated in the study. In behavioural test session, ACDT and speech tests were administered. In electrophysiological test session, sound onset and ACC responses of participants stimulated by/ui/speech structure were recorded and N1–P2 peak-to-peak amplitude and N1 latencies were determined. Results No significant correlation was found between individuals’ behavioural and electrophysiological responses but it was observed that individuals dived into two clusters in terms of ACDT responses (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean ACC amplitudes of the clusters. No statistically significant difference was observed between the mean ACC N1 latency findings of the clusters, suggesting that ACC amplitude may be a better predictor than latency in auditory discrimination. Conclusion ACC measurement may be a potential clinical tool to evaluate auditory discrimination performance in individuals with CI, but using the electrophysiological and behavioural tests together may provide a more holistic perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信