{"title":"没有过去就不可能有未来:在两者之间漂流","authors":"Sonja Boon, K. Lahey","doi":"10.7202/1066419ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this collaborative paper, we bring the work of Billy-Ray Belcourt, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, Dionne Brand, and M. NourbeSe Philip into conversation in order to consider the concept of drift. Drawing on drift as both metaphor and methodology, we argue that drifting is not aimless or passive, as dictionary definitions suggest; rather, as a form of refusal, to follow the work of Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang (2014a, 2014b), it can be understood as resistance to colonial gestures of capture and containment. Inherently mobile, drift revels in inadvertent assemblages and volatile juxtapositions that reveal the artifice of the worlds we currently inhabit, in the process making new worlds possible. In this way, we suggest that drift is necessarily decolonial, in that it is premised on different ways of interacting among human, non-human, and more-than-human. Working through themes of intimacy, love, origins, dirt, and accountings, we argue that drift can be more productively read as an agential mode of kinning, making, and thinking together.","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impossibility of a Future in the Absence of a Past: Drifting in the In-Between\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Boon, K. Lahey\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1066419ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this collaborative paper, we bring the work of Billy-Ray Belcourt, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, Dionne Brand, and M. NourbeSe Philip into conversation in order to consider the concept of drift. Drawing on drift as both metaphor and methodology, we argue that drifting is not aimless or passive, as dictionary definitions suggest; rather, as a form of refusal, to follow the work of Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang (2014a, 2014b), it can be understood as resistance to colonial gestures of capture and containment. Inherently mobile, drift revels in inadvertent assemblages and volatile juxtapositions that reveal the artifice of the worlds we currently inhabit, in the process making new worlds possible. In this way, we suggest that drift is necessarily decolonial, in that it is premised on different ways of interacting among human, non-human, and more-than-human. Working through themes of intimacy, love, origins, dirt, and accountings, we argue that drift can be more productively read as an agential mode of kinning, making, and thinking together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066419ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066419ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在这篇合作论文中,我们将比利-雷·贝尔库特、Leanne Betasamosake Simpson、Dionne Brand和M. NourbeSe Philip的工作带入对话,以考虑漂移的概念。将漂移作为隐喻和方法论,我们认为漂移不是无目的的或被动的,正如字典定义所暗示的那样;相反,作为一种拒绝的形式,按照Eve Tuck和K. Wayne Yang (2014a, 2014b)的工作,它可以被理解为对捕获和遏制的殖民姿态的抵抗。漂移本身就是移动的,它陶醉于不经意的组合和不稳定的并置,揭示了我们目前居住的世界的技巧,在这个过程中,新的世界成为可能。通过这种方式,我们认为漂移必然是非殖民化的,因为它是以人类、非人类和非人类之间的不同互动方式为前提的。通过研究亲密、爱、起源、肮脏和会计等主题,我们认为,漂移可以被更有效地解读为一种共同创造、创造和思考的代理模式。
The Impossibility of a Future in the Absence of a Past: Drifting in the In-Between
In this collaborative paper, we bring the work of Billy-Ray Belcourt, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, Dionne Brand, and M. NourbeSe Philip into conversation in order to consider the concept of drift. Drawing on drift as both metaphor and methodology, we argue that drifting is not aimless or passive, as dictionary definitions suggest; rather, as a form of refusal, to follow the work of Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang (2014a, 2014b), it can be understood as resistance to colonial gestures of capture and containment. Inherently mobile, drift revels in inadvertent assemblages and volatile juxtapositions that reveal the artifice of the worlds we currently inhabit, in the process making new worlds possible. In this way, we suggest that drift is necessarily decolonial, in that it is premised on different ways of interacting among human, non-human, and more-than-human. Working through themes of intimacy, love, origins, dirt, and accountings, we argue that drift can be more productively read as an agential mode of kinning, making, and thinking together.