IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Ömer Şekerci
{"title":"Culpeper’s Impoliteness Strategies in Neil Simon’s ‘Biloxi Blues’","authors":"Ömer Şekerci","doi":"10.22364/bjellc.13.2023.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impoliteness has recently been of interest to scholars as a linguistic study in the field of pragmatics. It has emerged as the opposite orientation to politeness strategy, theory and studies. This paper explores how the impoliteness strategies mapped out by Jonathan Culpeper (1996) are employed in dramatic texts. It examines Culpeper’s impoliteness strategies designed to investigate face in the dramatic text. This paper tests the strategies through Neil Simon’s Biloxi Blues (1985). This dramatic comedy is used for three reasons: (1) as a drama, it is a mirror of life and real-life speech events; (2) impoliteness strategies provide a resource to analyse impolite interactions between the characters in dialogic discourse; (3) dramatic texts provide a rich context to interpret and analyse verbal and non-verbal impoliteness strategies. Impoliteness strategies can cause disharmony and conflict between characters in a dramatic text. The interactions exchanged by the characters in Biloxi Blues are analysed according to Culpeper’s five impoliteness strategies: bald on record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, sarcasm or mock politeness, and withhold politeness. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method to determine how face-threatening acts are incorporated into the play in line with Culpeper’s impoliteness strategies propounded in his article entitled Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness (1996). The paper also examines how the characters react to face-threatening acts. In the twelve selected dramatic extracts, seventeen cases of positive impoliteness, ten cases of bald on record impoliteness, eight cases of sarcasm or mock politeness, and four cases of negative impoliteness have been observed. Moreover, it has also been observed that the characters use taboo words and abusive and strong language. The bald on record impolite acts are aggravated mainly by abuses, sexual insults and name-calling strategies. Racial slurs have also been identified as a part of positive impoliteness.","PeriodicalId":55896,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/bjellc.13.2023.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不礼貌作为语用学领域的语言学研究,近年来一直受到学者们的关注。它作为礼貌策略、理论和研究的对立面而出现。本文探讨了乔纳森·卡尔佩珀(1996)提出的不礼貌策略在戏剧文本中的运用。本文考察了卡尔佩珀为研究戏剧文本中的面孔而设计的不礼貌策略。本文以Neil Simon的《Biloxi Blues》(1985)为例对这一策略进行了检验。使用这种戏剧喜剧有三个原因:(1)作为戏剧,它是生活和现实生活中的言语事件的镜子;(2)不礼貌策略为分析对话话语中人物之间的不礼貌互动提供了资源;(3)戏剧文本为解释和分析言语和非言语不礼貌策略提供了丰富的语境。在戏剧文本中,不礼貌策略会造成人物之间的不和谐和冲突。根据卡尔佩珀提出的五种不礼貌策略:公开的不礼貌、积极的不礼貌、消极的不礼貌、讽刺或嘲弄的不礼貌、含蓄的不礼貌,分析了《比洛克西蓝调》中人物之间的互动。本研究采用描述性定性方法来确定威胁面部的行为是如何被纳入戏剧的,这与Culpeper在其题为“对不礼貌的剖析”(1996)的文章中提出的不礼貌策略相一致。本文还研究了角色对威胁脸部行为的反应。在12个精选的戏剧节选中,观察到17例积极的不礼貌,10例秃顶记录的不礼貌,8例讽刺或嘲笑的不礼貌,4例消极的不礼貌。此外,还观察到人物使用禁忌语和辱骂和强烈的语言。记录在案的不礼貌行为主要因辱骂、性侵犯和辱骂策略而加剧。种族歧视也被认为是积极无礼行为的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culpeper’s Impoliteness Strategies in Neil Simon’s ‘Biloxi Blues’
Impoliteness has recently been of interest to scholars as a linguistic study in the field of pragmatics. It has emerged as the opposite orientation to politeness strategy, theory and studies. This paper explores how the impoliteness strategies mapped out by Jonathan Culpeper (1996) are employed in dramatic texts. It examines Culpeper’s impoliteness strategies designed to investigate face in the dramatic text. This paper tests the strategies through Neil Simon’s Biloxi Blues (1985). This dramatic comedy is used for three reasons: (1) as a drama, it is a mirror of life and real-life speech events; (2) impoliteness strategies provide a resource to analyse impolite interactions between the characters in dialogic discourse; (3) dramatic texts provide a rich context to interpret and analyse verbal and non-verbal impoliteness strategies. Impoliteness strategies can cause disharmony and conflict between characters in a dramatic text. The interactions exchanged by the characters in Biloxi Blues are analysed according to Culpeper’s five impoliteness strategies: bald on record impoliteness, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, sarcasm or mock politeness, and withhold politeness. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method to determine how face-threatening acts are incorporated into the play in line with Culpeper’s impoliteness strategies propounded in his article entitled Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness (1996). The paper also examines how the characters react to face-threatening acts. In the twelve selected dramatic extracts, seventeen cases of positive impoliteness, ten cases of bald on record impoliteness, eight cases of sarcasm or mock politeness, and four cases of negative impoliteness have been observed. Moreover, it has also been observed that the characters use taboo words and abusive and strong language. The bald on record impolite acts are aggravated mainly by abuses, sexual insults and name-calling strategies. Racial slurs have also been identified as a part of positive impoliteness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信