生态系统变量与硕士咨询生职业认同的关系

Q2 Social Sciences
Edmund. Ewe, K. Ng
{"title":"生态系统变量与硕士咨询生职业认同的关系","authors":"Edmund. Ewe, K. Ng","doi":"10.1080/2326716X.2022.2053245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the recent increased attention in professional identity in the counseling profession, the literature on professional identity development (PID) of master’s students is limited. As such, we designed a cross-sectional, correlational study to examine whether training environment, advisor-advisee relationship, and online versus on-ground learning delivery could predict students’ PID. We recruited 229 students from CACREP-accredited programs to complete a web-based survey. Bivariate correlation results showed that master’s-level counseling students who reported higher levels of satisfaction in their advisor-advisee relationship and a stronger training environment reported higher levels of professional identity. Regression results further showed that the combined study predictors significantly accounted for 9% of the variance of their professional identity (PI). Only the advisor-advisee relationship and the number of courses students had taken contributed uniquely to the students’ PI. Implications on the criticality to consider ecological influences when understanding students’ PID is discussed.","PeriodicalId":37213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between ecosystemic variables and professional identity of master’s counseling students\",\"authors\":\"Edmund. Ewe, K. Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2326716X.2022.2053245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite the recent increased attention in professional identity in the counseling profession, the literature on professional identity development (PID) of master’s students is limited. As such, we designed a cross-sectional, correlational study to examine whether training environment, advisor-advisee relationship, and online versus on-ground learning delivery could predict students’ PID. We recruited 229 students from CACREP-accredited programs to complete a web-based survey. Bivariate correlation results showed that master’s-level counseling students who reported higher levels of satisfaction in their advisor-advisee relationship and a stronger training environment reported higher levels of professional identity. Regression results further showed that the combined study predictors significantly accounted for 9% of the variance of their professional identity (PI). Only the advisor-advisee relationship and the number of courses students had taken contributed uniquely to the students’ PI. Implications on the criticality to consider ecological influences when understanding students’ PID is discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2022.2053245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2022.2053245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管近年来咨询专业的专业认同问题越来越受到关注,但关于硕士研究生专业认同发展(PID)的文献却很有限。因此,我们设计了一项横断面相关研究,以检验培训环境、导师与被导师的关系以及在线与实地学习交付是否可以预测学生的PID。我们从cacrep认证的项目中招募了229名学生来完成一项基于网络的调查。双变量相关结果显示,硕士水平的咨询学生对导师与被导师关系的满意度越高,培训环境越强,其职业认同水平也越高。回归结果进一步表明,联合研究预测因子显著占其职业认同(PI)方差的9%。只有导师与被导师的关系和学生修过的课程数量对学生的PI有独特的影响。讨论了在理解学生的PID时考虑生态影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships between ecosystemic variables and professional identity of master’s counseling students
ABSTRACT Despite the recent increased attention in professional identity in the counseling profession, the literature on professional identity development (PID) of master’s students is limited. As such, we designed a cross-sectional, correlational study to examine whether training environment, advisor-advisee relationship, and online versus on-ground learning delivery could predict students’ PID. We recruited 229 students from CACREP-accredited programs to complete a web-based survey. Bivariate correlation results showed that master’s-level counseling students who reported higher levels of satisfaction in their advisor-advisee relationship and a stronger training environment reported higher levels of professional identity. Regression results further showed that the combined study predictors significantly accounted for 9% of the variance of their professional identity (PI). Only the advisor-advisee relationship and the number of courses students had taken contributed uniquely to the students’ PI. Implications on the criticality to consider ecological influences when understanding students’ PID is discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信