大学生聊天室互动任务对社会反馈的心理生理反应

Samantha L. Birk, Rebekah J. Mennies, Karina Guerra-Guzman, Darien Aunapu, T. Olino
{"title":"大学生聊天室互动任务对社会反馈的心理生理反应","authors":"Samantha L. Birk, Rebekah J. Mennies, Karina Guerra-Guzman, Darien Aunapu, T. Olino","doi":"10.55913/joep.v1i1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Receipt of both positive and negative social feedback is associated with psychophysiological responses, and such responses vary based on levels of internalizing symptoms and associated cognitive constructs. However, research examining the relationship between physiological response to social feedback and internalizing symptoms is mixed, and there is a need to develop salient tasks to assess responses to social feedback. This paper reports on two studies that examined physiological response to social feedback in undergraduate students using the Chatroom Interact Task (CIT). We also explored associations between physiological response to social feedback and internalizing symptoms and associated constructs. Participants were 48 (35 female; Study 1) and 65 (55 female; Study 2) undergraduate students. Participants completed self-report questionnaires of internalizing symptoms and associated cognitive constructs. They also completed the CIT to assess response to acceptance and rejection, while physiological data, including electrocardiogram and respiration to derive respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), were acquired. Results across both studies were largely consistent. There were significant differences in RSA during the questionnaire phase and the neutral and acceptance/rejection phases of the CIT. There were no differences between RSA during acceptance and rejection phases. Internalizing symptoms and associated constructs were not related to differences in RSA. The current study indicates questionable validity for the use of the CIT to elicit heightened physiological responses to social feedback in undergraduates and suggests important considerations for the future study of responses to social feedback and the design of associated tasks.","PeriodicalId":73729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychophysiological Response to Social Feedback using the Chatroom Interact Task in Undergraduate Students\",\"authors\":\"Samantha L. Birk, Rebekah J. Mennies, Karina Guerra-Guzman, Darien Aunapu, T. Olino\",\"doi\":\"10.55913/joep.v1i1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Receipt of both positive and negative social feedback is associated with psychophysiological responses, and such responses vary based on levels of internalizing symptoms and associated cognitive constructs. However, research examining the relationship between physiological response to social feedback and internalizing symptoms is mixed, and there is a need to develop salient tasks to assess responses to social feedback. This paper reports on two studies that examined physiological response to social feedback in undergraduate students using the Chatroom Interact Task (CIT). We also explored associations between physiological response to social feedback and internalizing symptoms and associated constructs. Participants were 48 (35 female; Study 1) and 65 (55 female; Study 2) undergraduate students. Participants completed self-report questionnaires of internalizing symptoms and associated cognitive constructs. They also completed the CIT to assess response to acceptance and rejection, while physiological data, including electrocardiogram and respiration to derive respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), were acquired. Results across both studies were largely consistent. There were significant differences in RSA during the questionnaire phase and the neutral and acceptance/rejection phases of the CIT. There were no differences between RSA during acceptance and rejection phases. Internalizing symptoms and associated constructs were not related to differences in RSA. The current study indicates questionable validity for the use of the CIT to elicit heightened physiological responses to social feedback in undergraduates and suggests important considerations for the future study of responses to social feedback and the design of associated tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of emotion and psychopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of emotion and psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55913/joep.v1i1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55913/joep.v1i1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受积极和消极的社会反馈与心理生理反应有关,这种反应根据内化症状的水平和相关的认知结构而变化。然而,对社会反馈的生理反应与内化症状之间关系的研究是混杂的,有必要制定突出的任务来评估对社会反馈的反应。本文报道了两项利用聊天室互动任务(CIT)检测大学生对社会反馈的生理反应的研究。我们也探讨了对社会反馈的生理反应与内化症状和相关构念之间的联系。参与者48人(女性35人;研究1)和65(55名女性;研究本科生。参与者完成内化症状和相关认知构念的自我报告问卷。他们还完成了CIT来评估对接受和拒绝的反应,同时获得了生理数据,包括心电图和呼吸,以得出呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)。两项研究的结果基本一致。问卷阶段、中立阶段和接受/拒绝阶段的RSA有显著差异,接受阶段和拒绝阶段的RSA无显著差异。内化症状和相关构念与RSA的差异无关。目前的研究表明,使用CIT来引起大学生对社会反馈的更高生理反应的有效性值得怀疑,并建议对社会反馈反应的未来研究和相关任务的设计进行重要考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychophysiological Response to Social Feedback using the Chatroom Interact Task in Undergraduate Students
Receipt of both positive and negative social feedback is associated with psychophysiological responses, and such responses vary based on levels of internalizing symptoms and associated cognitive constructs. However, research examining the relationship between physiological response to social feedback and internalizing symptoms is mixed, and there is a need to develop salient tasks to assess responses to social feedback. This paper reports on two studies that examined physiological response to social feedback in undergraduate students using the Chatroom Interact Task (CIT). We also explored associations between physiological response to social feedback and internalizing symptoms and associated constructs. Participants were 48 (35 female; Study 1) and 65 (55 female; Study 2) undergraduate students. Participants completed self-report questionnaires of internalizing symptoms and associated cognitive constructs. They also completed the CIT to assess response to acceptance and rejection, while physiological data, including electrocardiogram and respiration to derive respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), were acquired. Results across both studies were largely consistent. There were significant differences in RSA during the questionnaire phase and the neutral and acceptance/rejection phases of the CIT. There were no differences between RSA during acceptance and rejection phases. Internalizing symptoms and associated constructs were not related to differences in RSA. The current study indicates questionable validity for the use of the CIT to elicit heightened physiological responses to social feedback in undergraduates and suggests important considerations for the future study of responses to social feedback and the design of associated tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信