化石遗址的科学意义量化:以澳大利亚西部晚泥盆纪Gogo化石遗址为例

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
J. Long
{"title":"化石遗址的科学意义量化:以澳大利亚西部晚泥盆纪Gogo化石遗址为例","authors":"J. Long","doi":"10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long, J.A. 2016. Quantifying scientific significance of a fossil site: the Gogo Fossil sites (Late Devonian, Western Australia) as a case study. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 74: 5–15. Assessing the scientific significance of fossil sites has up to now been largely a matter of subjective opinion with few or no metrics being employed. By applying similar metrics used for assessing academic performance, both qualitative and quantitative, to fossil sites we gain a real indication of their significance that enables direct comparison with other sites both nationally and globally. Indices suggested are those using total pages published for both peer-reviewed and combined peer-reviewed and popular publications, total citations from the papers, total impact points for site (citing palaeontologyrelated papers only), total number of very high impact papers (VHIP; journal impact factor>30) and social media metrics. These provide a measure of how much the published fossil data from a site has been utilised. The Late Devonian fossils of the Gogo Formation of Western Australia are here used as an example of how these metrics can be applied. The Gogo sites for example, have produced c.4384 pages of peer-reviewed papers (c.5458 total combined with popular works); generated papers with a total impact point score of 611, including 10 VHI papers, and generated 4009 citations. The sites have an overall h-index of 33. Combing these into a Scientific Site Significance Index (SSSI) will permit direct comparisons of site significance to be made for initiating discussions about site protection, tourism, geopark status, local heritage listings or potential future world heritage nominations.","PeriodicalId":53647,"journal":{"name":"Memoirs of Museum Victoria","volume":"12 1","pages":"5-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying scientific significance of a fossil site: the Gogo Fossil sites (Late Devonian, Western Australia) as a case study\",\"authors\":\"J. Long\",\"doi\":\"10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Long, J.A. 2016. Quantifying scientific significance of a fossil site: the Gogo Fossil sites (Late Devonian, Western Australia) as a case study. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 74: 5–15. Assessing the scientific significance of fossil sites has up to now been largely a matter of subjective opinion with few or no metrics being employed. By applying similar metrics used for assessing academic performance, both qualitative and quantitative, to fossil sites we gain a real indication of their significance that enables direct comparison with other sites both nationally and globally. Indices suggested are those using total pages published for both peer-reviewed and combined peer-reviewed and popular publications, total citations from the papers, total impact points for site (citing palaeontologyrelated papers only), total number of very high impact papers (VHIP; journal impact factor>30) and social media metrics. These provide a measure of how much the published fossil data from a site has been utilised. The Late Devonian fossils of the Gogo Formation of Western Australia are here used as an example of how these metrics can be applied. The Gogo sites for example, have produced c.4384 pages of peer-reviewed papers (c.5458 total combined with popular works); generated papers with a total impact point score of 611, including 10 VHI papers, and generated 4009 citations. The sites have an overall h-index of 33. Combing these into a Scientific Site Significance Index (SSSI) will permit direct comparisons of site significance to be made for initiating discussions about site protection, tourism, geopark status, local heritage listings or potential future world heritage nominations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memoirs of Museum Victoria\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"5-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memoirs of Museum Victoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoirs of Museum Victoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Long, J.A. 2016。化石遗址的科学意义量化:以澳大利亚西部晚泥盆纪Gogo化石遗址为例。维多利亚博物馆回忆录74:5-15。到目前为止,评估化石遗址的科学意义在很大程度上是一个主观意见的问题,很少或根本没有使用指标。通过将用于评估学术表现的类似指标(定性和定量)应用于化石遗址,我们获得了其重要性的真实指示,从而可以与国内和全球其他遗址进行直接比较。建议的索引是使用同行评议和综合同行评议和流行出版物的总页数,论文的总引用,站点的总影响点(仅引用古生物相关论文),非常高影响论文的总数(VHIP;期刊影响因子>30)和社交媒体指标。它们提供了一种测量方法,可以衡量一个地点公布的化石数据被利用了多少。这里以西澳大利亚州Gogo组的晚泥盆世化石为例,说明如何应用这些指标。例如,Gogo网站已经产生了4384页的同行评议论文(加上流行作品总共5458页);生成的论文总影响点得分为611,其中VHI论文10篇,产生4009次引用。这些网站的总体h指数为33。将这些数据整合到科学遗址重要性指数(SSSI)中,可以对遗址的重要性进行直接比较,从而启动有关遗址保护、旅游、地质公园地位、当地遗产名录或潜在的未来世界遗产提名的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying scientific significance of a fossil site: the Gogo Fossil sites (Late Devonian, Western Australia) as a case study
Long, J.A. 2016. Quantifying scientific significance of a fossil site: the Gogo Fossil sites (Late Devonian, Western Australia) as a case study. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 74: 5–15. Assessing the scientific significance of fossil sites has up to now been largely a matter of subjective opinion with few or no metrics being employed. By applying similar metrics used for assessing academic performance, both qualitative and quantitative, to fossil sites we gain a real indication of their significance that enables direct comparison with other sites both nationally and globally. Indices suggested are those using total pages published for both peer-reviewed and combined peer-reviewed and popular publications, total citations from the papers, total impact points for site (citing palaeontologyrelated papers only), total number of very high impact papers (VHIP; journal impact factor>30) and social media metrics. These provide a measure of how much the published fossil data from a site has been utilised. The Late Devonian fossils of the Gogo Formation of Western Australia are here used as an example of how these metrics can be applied. The Gogo sites for example, have produced c.4384 pages of peer-reviewed papers (c.5458 total combined with popular works); generated papers with a total impact point score of 611, including 10 VHI papers, and generated 4009 citations. The sites have an overall h-index of 33. Combing these into a Scientific Site Significance Index (SSSI) will permit direct comparisons of site significance to be made for initiating discussions about site protection, tourism, geopark status, local heritage listings or potential future world heritage nominations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memoirs of Museum Victoria
Memoirs of Museum Victoria Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信