不同修剪方式对茶叶产量和品质的影响

Md. Imran Hossen, T. Ahmed, Riyadh Arefin
{"title":"不同修剪方式对茶叶产量和品质的影响","authors":"Md. Imran Hossen, T. Ahmed, Riyadh Arefin","doi":"10.9734/aprj/2021/v8i430184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Pruning is the cutting of branches of a tea bush at predetermined height and at a specified interval in order to reinvigorate and bring tea bushes within reach of the pluckers, which directly related to the productivity and quality of tea. In Bangladesh, Three and four year pruning cycles were the conventional recommendations for the tea plantation. In this experiment, along with BTRI recommended four types of pruning operations (LP, DSK, MSK and LSK), two more types of  pruning operations such as: UP (Unprune) and LoS (Level of Skiff) were considered as treatments. This experiment was conducted with two main objectives: to evaluate the yield and yield related parameters of tea due to different types of pruning operations as well as to find out the effect of pruning operations on organoleptic quality of black tea. \nStudy Design, Place and Duration of Study: This experiment was conducted ‘D2 Thall’ area at the main research farm of Bangladesh Tea Research Institute (BTRI) from December 2017 to November 2019. The experimental design was Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with six treatments and three replications. \nMethodology: \nThe treatments are denoted as T1 (UP: Unpruned) control, T2 (LP: Light Pruning), T3 (DSK: Deep Skiffing), T4 (MSK: Medium Skiffing), T5 (LSK: Light Skiffing) and T6 (LoS: Level of Skiffing) respectively. Data were collected under the following parameters: \n \nNumber of plucking point or pluckable shoot/bush in each plucking \nFresh weight (g) of 100 shoots (three leaves and a bud) \nOven Dry weight (g) of 100 shoots (three leaves and a bud) to calculate Dry Matter Content \nGreen leaf weight (kg) to calculate Yield of each treatment \nNumber of plucking round to calculate Yield gap of each treatment \nBlack Tea Quality of each treatment by Organoleptic Tasting Method. \n \nResults: It was found that, number of plucking points/pluckable shoot and yield were found significantly high in T6 (Level of Skiffing), T5 (Light Skiffing) and T1 (Unpruned) than the other treatments. But in terms of tea quality, lowest quality tea was found in T1 (Unpruned), T6 (Level of Skiffing) and T5 (Light Skiffing) treatment. So, it can be concluded that, ‘Skiff Pruning’ or ‘Unprune’ technique had positive effect on yield but the quality of these technique were poor in comparison with other treatments. T2 (Light Pruning) treatment gave more tender and fresh shoot than the other treatment. For this reason, dry matter was low in T2 (Light Pruning) treatment but tea quality was much better than the other pruning technique. \nConclusion: Pruning has  positive or  negative effect on  yield and quality of  tea.  ‘Skiff Pruning’ or \n‘Unprune’ has positive effect on yield but the quality of is poor than the other treatments. Best Quality tea can be produced from Light Pruning tea section because of having more tender and fresh shoot than other treatments.","PeriodicalId":8546,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Plant Science & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Types of Pruning Operations on Yield and Quality of Tea\",\"authors\":\"Md. Imran Hossen, T. Ahmed, Riyadh Arefin\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/aprj/2021/v8i430184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: Pruning is the cutting of branches of a tea bush at predetermined height and at a specified interval in order to reinvigorate and bring tea bushes within reach of the pluckers, which directly related to the productivity and quality of tea. In Bangladesh, Three and four year pruning cycles were the conventional recommendations for the tea plantation. In this experiment, along with BTRI recommended four types of pruning operations (LP, DSK, MSK and LSK), two more types of  pruning operations such as: UP (Unprune) and LoS (Level of Skiff) were considered as treatments. This experiment was conducted with two main objectives: to evaluate the yield and yield related parameters of tea due to different types of pruning operations as well as to find out the effect of pruning operations on organoleptic quality of black tea. \\nStudy Design, Place and Duration of Study: This experiment was conducted ‘D2 Thall’ area at the main research farm of Bangladesh Tea Research Institute (BTRI) from December 2017 to November 2019. The experimental design was Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with six treatments and three replications. \\nMethodology: \\nThe treatments are denoted as T1 (UP: Unpruned) control, T2 (LP: Light Pruning), T3 (DSK: Deep Skiffing), T4 (MSK: Medium Skiffing), T5 (LSK: Light Skiffing) and T6 (LoS: Level of Skiffing) respectively. Data were collected under the following parameters: \\n \\nNumber of plucking point or pluckable shoot/bush in each plucking \\nFresh weight (g) of 100 shoots (three leaves and a bud) \\nOven Dry weight (g) of 100 shoots (three leaves and a bud) to calculate Dry Matter Content \\nGreen leaf weight (kg) to calculate Yield of each treatment \\nNumber of plucking round to calculate Yield gap of each treatment \\nBlack Tea Quality of each treatment by Organoleptic Tasting Method. \\n \\nResults: It was found that, number of plucking points/pluckable shoot and yield were found significantly high in T6 (Level of Skiffing), T5 (Light Skiffing) and T1 (Unpruned) than the other treatments. But in terms of tea quality, lowest quality tea was found in T1 (Unpruned), T6 (Level of Skiffing) and T5 (Light Skiffing) treatment. So, it can be concluded that, ‘Skiff Pruning’ or ‘Unprune’ technique had positive effect on yield but the quality of these technique were poor in comparison with other treatments. T2 (Light Pruning) treatment gave more tender and fresh shoot than the other treatment. For this reason, dry matter was low in T2 (Light Pruning) treatment but tea quality was much better than the other pruning technique. \\nConclusion: Pruning has  positive or  negative effect on  yield and quality of  tea.  ‘Skiff Pruning’ or \\n‘Unprune’ has positive effect on yield but the quality of is poor than the other treatments. Best Quality tea can be produced from Light Pruning tea section because of having more tender and fresh shoot than other treatments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Plant Science & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Plant Science & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/aprj/2021/v8i430184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Plant Science & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/aprj/2021/v8i430184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:剪枝是在预定的高度和指定的间隔上剪下茶树的树枝,以使茶树恢复活力,并使茶树处于采摘者的触手可及的范围内,这直接关系到茶叶的生产力和质量。在孟加拉国,三到四年的修剪周期是茶园的传统建议。本试验除BTRI推荐的4种修剪操作(LP、DSK、MSK和LSK)外,还考虑了UP (Unprune)和LoS (Level of Skiff)两种修剪操作作为处理。本试验主要有两个目的,一是评价不同修剪方式对茶叶产量及产量相关参数的影响,二是研究修剪方式对红茶感官品质的影响。研究设计、地点和研究时间:本实验于2017年12月至2019年11月在孟加拉国茶叶研究所(BTRI)主要研究农场“D2 Thall”区域进行。试验设计为随机完全区组设计(RCBD), 6个处理,3个重复。方法:处理分别为T1 (UP:未修剪)对照、T2 (LP:轻度修剪)、T3 (DSK:深度修剪)、T4 (MSK:中度修剪)、T5 (LSK:轻度修剪)和T6 (LoS:轻度修剪)。按以下参数收集数据:每次采采时采采点数或可采采梢/丛数100枝(三叶一芽)鲜重(g) 100枝(三叶一芽)烘箱干重(g)计算干物质含量绿叶重(kg)计算各处理产量采采轮数计算各处理产量差距。结果:T6(脱茬水平)、T5(轻度脱茬)和T1(未修剪)处理的摘点数/可摘苗数和产量显著高于其他处理。但在茶叶品质方面,T1(未修剪)、T6(脱皮水平)和T5(轻脱皮)处理的茶叶品质最低。综上所述,“剪枝”或“不剪枝”技术对产量有积极影响,但与其他处理相比质量较差。T2(轻修剪)处理比其他处理嫩芽多。因此,T2(轻修剪)处理的干物质含量较低,但茶叶品质明显优于其他修剪方式。结论:修剪对茶叶的产量和品质有积极或消极的影响。“剪枝”或“不剪枝”处理对产量有积极影响,但质量较其他处理差。轻剪茶段的茶芽较其他处理更嫩、更新鲜,可生产出优质的茶叶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Different Types of Pruning Operations on Yield and Quality of Tea
Aims: Pruning is the cutting of branches of a tea bush at predetermined height and at a specified interval in order to reinvigorate and bring tea bushes within reach of the pluckers, which directly related to the productivity and quality of tea. In Bangladesh, Three and four year pruning cycles were the conventional recommendations for the tea plantation. In this experiment, along with BTRI recommended four types of pruning operations (LP, DSK, MSK and LSK), two more types of  pruning operations such as: UP (Unprune) and LoS (Level of Skiff) were considered as treatments. This experiment was conducted with two main objectives: to evaluate the yield and yield related parameters of tea due to different types of pruning operations as well as to find out the effect of pruning operations on organoleptic quality of black tea. Study Design, Place and Duration of Study: This experiment was conducted ‘D2 Thall’ area at the main research farm of Bangladesh Tea Research Institute (BTRI) from December 2017 to November 2019. The experimental design was Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with six treatments and three replications. Methodology: The treatments are denoted as T1 (UP: Unpruned) control, T2 (LP: Light Pruning), T3 (DSK: Deep Skiffing), T4 (MSK: Medium Skiffing), T5 (LSK: Light Skiffing) and T6 (LoS: Level of Skiffing) respectively. Data were collected under the following parameters: Number of plucking point or pluckable shoot/bush in each plucking Fresh weight (g) of 100 shoots (three leaves and a bud) Oven Dry weight (g) of 100 shoots (three leaves and a bud) to calculate Dry Matter Content Green leaf weight (kg) to calculate Yield of each treatment Number of plucking round to calculate Yield gap of each treatment Black Tea Quality of each treatment by Organoleptic Tasting Method. Results: It was found that, number of plucking points/pluckable shoot and yield were found significantly high in T6 (Level of Skiffing), T5 (Light Skiffing) and T1 (Unpruned) than the other treatments. But in terms of tea quality, lowest quality tea was found in T1 (Unpruned), T6 (Level of Skiffing) and T5 (Light Skiffing) treatment. So, it can be concluded that, ‘Skiff Pruning’ or ‘Unprune’ technique had positive effect on yield but the quality of these technique were poor in comparison with other treatments. T2 (Light Pruning) treatment gave more tender and fresh shoot than the other treatment. For this reason, dry matter was low in T2 (Light Pruning) treatment but tea quality was much better than the other pruning technique. Conclusion: Pruning has  positive or  negative effect on  yield and quality of  tea.  ‘Skiff Pruning’ or ‘Unprune’ has positive effect on yield but the quality of is poor than the other treatments. Best Quality tea can be produced from Light Pruning tea section because of having more tender and fresh shoot than other treatments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信