元认知语言的本质与网络:元认知语境理论的发展

D. Jagals
{"title":"元认知语言的本质与网络:元认知语境理论的发展","authors":"D. Jagals","doi":"10.36315/2023v1end003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical developments in education research have established, almost parallel, two strands of theories: theories of networks (e.g., gestalt theory, social network analysis and micro-triad analysis) which explain social interaction among students and theories about meta-cognitive function (e.g. metamemory, metacognition and metarepresentational) which explain the inner workings of the mind. This split between theories (one form focusing on networks and the other on meta-cognition) leaves little room for advancing our understanding of metacognition as a social construct since no theory exists for explaining the relationship between networks and metacognition. In this paper, the author explore four propositions derived from metacognition research to propose a local theory. The four propositions are: (1) metacognitive knowledge, (2) regulation, (3) metacognitive language and (4) networking as constructs of this theory. In particular, the theory of metacognitive locale explains the nature of metacognitive language and metacognitive networks as contextualized in a mathematics education methodology course. Video recordings of lesson study experiences of two groups of final year students were analyzed through social network analysis to visualize their social interaction, and coded inductively to identify specific phrases through which they express their thinking. The results show constructs of metacognition, metacognitive language and metacognitive networking emerge on a social, interpersonal and social-metacognitive stratum which brings the two strands of theories together, thereby narrowing theoretical divide.","PeriodicalId":93546,"journal":{"name":"Education and new developments","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE NATURE OF METACOGNITIVE LANGUAGE AND NETWORKING: DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEORY OF METACOGNITIVE LOCALE\",\"authors\":\"D. Jagals\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2023v1end003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theoretical developments in education research have established, almost parallel, two strands of theories: theories of networks (e.g., gestalt theory, social network analysis and micro-triad analysis) which explain social interaction among students and theories about meta-cognitive function (e.g. metamemory, metacognition and metarepresentational) which explain the inner workings of the mind. This split between theories (one form focusing on networks and the other on meta-cognition) leaves little room for advancing our understanding of metacognition as a social construct since no theory exists for explaining the relationship between networks and metacognition. In this paper, the author explore four propositions derived from metacognition research to propose a local theory. The four propositions are: (1) metacognitive knowledge, (2) regulation, (3) metacognitive language and (4) networking as constructs of this theory. In particular, the theory of metacognitive locale explains the nature of metacognitive language and metacognitive networks as contextualized in a mathematics education methodology course. Video recordings of lesson study experiences of two groups of final year students were analyzed through social network analysis to visualize their social interaction, and coded inductively to identify specific phrases through which they express their thinking. The results show constructs of metacognition, metacognitive language and metacognitive networking emerge on a social, interpersonal and social-metacognitive stratum which brings the two strands of theories together, thereby narrowing theoretical divide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and new developments\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and new developments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and new developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育研究的理论发展已经建立了几乎平行的两股理论:解释学生之间社会互动的网络理论(如格式塔理论、社会网络分析和微三元分析)和解释心灵内部运作的元认知功能理论(如元记忆、元认知和元表征)。这种理论之间的分裂(一种形式侧重于网络,另一种形式侧重于元认知)使得我们对元认知作为一种社会结构的理解几乎没有空间,因为没有理论可以解释网络和元认知之间的关系。本文对元认知研究中的四个命题进行了探讨,提出了一个局部理论。这四个命题是:(1)元认知知识,(2)规则,(3)元认知语言和(4)网络作为该理论的结构。特别是,元认知语境理论解释了元认知语言和元认知网络在数学教育方法论课程中的本质。通过社会网络分析对两组高三学生的课堂学习经历录像进行分析,使其社会互动可视化,并进行归纳编码,识别出他们表达思维的特定短语。研究结果表明,元认知、元认知语言和元认知网络的结构出现在社会、人际和社会元认知层面,将两股理论结合在一起,从而缩小了理论分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE NATURE OF METACOGNITIVE LANGUAGE AND NETWORKING: DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEORY OF METACOGNITIVE LOCALE
Theoretical developments in education research have established, almost parallel, two strands of theories: theories of networks (e.g., gestalt theory, social network analysis and micro-triad analysis) which explain social interaction among students and theories about meta-cognitive function (e.g. metamemory, metacognition and metarepresentational) which explain the inner workings of the mind. This split between theories (one form focusing on networks and the other on meta-cognition) leaves little room for advancing our understanding of metacognition as a social construct since no theory exists for explaining the relationship between networks and metacognition. In this paper, the author explore four propositions derived from metacognition research to propose a local theory. The four propositions are: (1) metacognitive knowledge, (2) regulation, (3) metacognitive language and (4) networking as constructs of this theory. In particular, the theory of metacognitive locale explains the nature of metacognitive language and metacognitive networks as contextualized in a mathematics education methodology course. Video recordings of lesson study experiences of two groups of final year students were analyzed through social network analysis to visualize their social interaction, and coded inductively to identify specific phrases through which they express their thinking. The results show constructs of metacognition, metacognitive language and metacognitive networking emerge on a social, interpersonal and social-metacognitive stratum which brings the two strands of theories together, thereby narrowing theoretical divide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信