基于多传感器的加工信号测量和数据融合,以建立Inconel 617立铣削过程中TiAlN-PVD涂层硬质合金刀片的刀具磨损预测模型

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Pramod Adishesha, D. Lawrence K., J. Mathew
{"title":"基于多传感器的加工信号测量和数据融合,以建立Inconel 617立铣削过程中TiAlN-PVD涂层硬质合金刀片的刀具磨损预测模型","authors":"Pramod Adishesha, D. Lawrence K., J. Mathew","doi":"10.1177/09544054231185155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machining signals from the Force dynamometer, Acoustic Emission (AE), and Accelerometer are acquired and fused to develop Machine Learning (ML) models for tool wear monitoring of TiAlN-PVD coated carbide inserts. Milling experiments were performed on Inconel 617 with varied process parameter combinations until the tool flank wear met the failure criterion. Support Vector Regression, Random Forest Regression, and Long Short-Term Memory models are developed and compared based on a combination of sensor data fusion for tool wear predictions. It is observed that the Random Forest Regression approach can predict the tool wear with 94% accuracy compared to Support Vector Regression (85%) and Long Short-Term Memory (84%) models while using three-sensor data fusion. Further, the two-sensor data combination was used to test the relative efficacy of all the three developed machine learning tool wear models and found that the force dynamometer and the AE sensor fared better for Random Forest Regression and Long Short-Term Memory models in comparison to Support Vector Regression. For Support Vector Regression-based tool wear predictive models, force dynamometer and accelerometer data fusion performed better.","PeriodicalId":20663,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The multi-sensor-based measurement of machining signals and data fusion to develop predictive tool wear models for TiAlN-PVD coated carbide inserts during end milling of Inconel 617\",\"authors\":\"Pramod Adishesha, D. Lawrence K., J. Mathew\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544054231185155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machining signals from the Force dynamometer, Acoustic Emission (AE), and Accelerometer are acquired and fused to develop Machine Learning (ML) models for tool wear monitoring of TiAlN-PVD coated carbide inserts. Milling experiments were performed on Inconel 617 with varied process parameter combinations until the tool flank wear met the failure criterion. Support Vector Regression, Random Forest Regression, and Long Short-Term Memory models are developed and compared based on a combination of sensor data fusion for tool wear predictions. It is observed that the Random Forest Regression approach can predict the tool wear with 94% accuracy compared to Support Vector Regression (85%) and Long Short-Term Memory (84%) models while using three-sensor data fusion. Further, the two-sensor data combination was used to test the relative efficacy of all the three developed machine learning tool wear models and found that the force dynamometer and the AE sensor fared better for Random Forest Regression and Long Short-Term Memory models in comparison to Support Vector Regression. For Support Vector Regression-based tool wear predictive models, force dynamometer and accelerometer data fusion performed better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054231185155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054231185155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自力测力仪、声发射(AE)和加速度计的加工信号被采集和融合,以开发用于TiAlN-PVD涂层硬质合金刀片刀具磨损监测的机器学习(ML)模型。采用不同工艺参数组合对Inconel 617进行铣削试验,直至刀面磨损满足失效准则。基于传感器数据融合的工具磨损预测,开发并比较了支持向量回归、随机森林回归和长短期记忆模型。在使用三传感器数据融合时,与支持向量回归(85%)和长短期记忆(84%)模型相比,随机森林回归方法预测工具磨损的准确率为94%。此外,使用双传感器数据组合来测试所有三种开发的机器学习工具磨损模型的相对功效,并发现与支持向量回归相比,力测功机和声发射传感器在随机森林回归和长短期记忆模型中表现更好。对于基于支持向量回归的工具磨损预测模型,力测功仪和加速度计的数据融合效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The multi-sensor-based measurement of machining signals and data fusion to develop predictive tool wear models for TiAlN-PVD coated carbide inserts during end milling of Inconel 617
Machining signals from the Force dynamometer, Acoustic Emission (AE), and Accelerometer are acquired and fused to develop Machine Learning (ML) models for tool wear monitoring of TiAlN-PVD coated carbide inserts. Milling experiments were performed on Inconel 617 with varied process parameter combinations until the tool flank wear met the failure criterion. Support Vector Regression, Random Forest Regression, and Long Short-Term Memory models are developed and compared based on a combination of sensor data fusion for tool wear predictions. It is observed that the Random Forest Regression approach can predict the tool wear with 94% accuracy compared to Support Vector Regression (85%) and Long Short-Term Memory (84%) models while using three-sensor data fusion. Further, the two-sensor data combination was used to test the relative efficacy of all the three developed machine learning tool wear models and found that the force dynamometer and the AE sensor fared better for Random Forest Regression and Long Short-Term Memory models in comparison to Support Vector Regression. For Support Vector Regression-based tool wear predictive models, force dynamometer and accelerometer data fusion performed better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
30.80%
发文量
167
审稿时长
5.1 months
期刊介绍: Manufacturing industries throughout the world are changing very rapidly. New concepts and methods are being developed and exploited to enable efficient and effective manufacturing. Existing manufacturing processes are being improved to meet the requirements of lean and agile manufacturing. The aim of the Journal of Engineering Manufacture is to provide a focus for these developments in engineering manufacture by publishing original papers and review papers covering technological and scientific research, developments and management implementation in manufacturing. This journal is also peer reviewed. Contributions are welcomed in the broad areas of manufacturing processes, manufacturing technology and factory automation, digital manufacturing, design and manufacturing systems including management relevant to engineering manufacture. Of particular interest at the present time would be papers concerned with digital manufacturing, metrology enabled manufacturing, smart factory, additive manufacturing and composites as well as specialist manufacturing fields like nanotechnology, sustainable & clean manufacturing and bio-manufacturing. Articles may be Research Papers, Reviews, Technical Notes, or Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信