冲击书本:教科书作为一个分裂领域的文化文物

Q3 Social Sciences
Maegan Ciesielski, D. Goodwin
{"title":"冲击书本:教科书作为一个分裂领域的文化文物","authors":"Maegan Ciesielski, D. Goodwin","doi":"10.1080/14927713.2021.1971550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Therapeutic recreation (TR) presents two conceptualizations of recreation: as rehabilitation or as part of overall wellness. Textbooks are cultural artifacts used for passing disciplinary knowledge to students. The study purpose was to understand how TR practice is constructed and reproduced in textbooks, with attentiveness to hidden discourses. Selected chapters from two highly subscribed TR textbooks in Canada and the USA underwent a discourse analysis. Using a critical disability studies framework, respective thematic distinctions arose: individual responsibility for health, professionalization of TR, and medicalization of recreation; and being in relationship, disability as diversity, and solution and strength-based focus. The respective authors’ TR assumptions of either ameliorating deficits or building on existing strengths led to differing TR goals, varied practice contexts, and distinctive positions on relationship building – creating divergent discourses and discord at a cost to the field and those utilizing its services.","PeriodicalId":18056,"journal":{"name":"Leisure/Loisir","volume":"2013 1","pages":"167 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hitting the books: textbooks as cultural artifacts of a splintered field\",\"authors\":\"Maegan Ciesielski, D. Goodwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14927713.2021.1971550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Therapeutic recreation (TR) presents two conceptualizations of recreation: as rehabilitation or as part of overall wellness. Textbooks are cultural artifacts used for passing disciplinary knowledge to students. The study purpose was to understand how TR practice is constructed and reproduced in textbooks, with attentiveness to hidden discourses. Selected chapters from two highly subscribed TR textbooks in Canada and the USA underwent a discourse analysis. Using a critical disability studies framework, respective thematic distinctions arose: individual responsibility for health, professionalization of TR, and medicalization of recreation; and being in relationship, disability as diversity, and solution and strength-based focus. The respective authors’ TR assumptions of either ameliorating deficits or building on existing strengths led to differing TR goals, varied practice contexts, and distinctive positions on relationship building – creating divergent discourses and discord at a cost to the field and those utilizing its services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leisure/Loisir\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leisure/Loisir\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2021.1971550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leisure/Loisir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2021.1971550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗性娱乐(TR)提出了娱乐的两个概念:作为康复或作为整体健康的一部分。教科书是向学生传授学科知识的文化产物。研究的目的是了解TR实践是如何在教科书中构建和复制的,并关注隐藏的话语。从加拿大和美国两本高订阅量的TR教科书中选取章节进行了语篇分析。使用关键的残疾研究框架,出现了各自的主题区别:个人对健康的责任、TR的专业化和娱乐的医疗化;在一段关系中,残疾是一种多样性,解决方案和基于力量的关注。各自作者的TR假设要么是改善缺陷,要么是建立在现有优势上,导致了不同的TR目标、不同的实践背景和不同的关系建立立场——以该领域和利用其服务的人为代价,创造了不同的话语和不和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hitting the books: textbooks as cultural artifacts of a splintered field
ABSTRACT Therapeutic recreation (TR) presents two conceptualizations of recreation: as rehabilitation or as part of overall wellness. Textbooks are cultural artifacts used for passing disciplinary knowledge to students. The study purpose was to understand how TR practice is constructed and reproduced in textbooks, with attentiveness to hidden discourses. Selected chapters from two highly subscribed TR textbooks in Canada and the USA underwent a discourse analysis. Using a critical disability studies framework, respective thematic distinctions arose: individual responsibility for health, professionalization of TR, and medicalization of recreation; and being in relationship, disability as diversity, and solution and strength-based focus. The respective authors’ TR assumptions of either ameliorating deficits or building on existing strengths led to differing TR goals, varied practice contexts, and distinctive positions on relationship building – creating divergent discourses and discord at a cost to the field and those utilizing its services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leisure/Loisir
Leisure/Loisir Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信