有没有制药公司炒作社交焦虑症来增加销量?不:减轻人类痛苦的努力应该得到回报。

D. Sheehan
{"title":"有没有制药公司炒作社交焦虑症来增加销量?不:减轻人类痛苦的努力应该得到回报。","authors":"D. Sheehan","doi":"10.1136/EWJM.175.6.365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US News and World Report cover story, “How Shy Is Too Shy?” captured the debate about the pharmaceutical industry's role in bringing social anxiety disorder to the forefront of public awareness. Drug companies have been accused of fabricating this disorder to boost sales of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This is untrue and does a great disservice to patients. In fact, the pharmaceutical industry was a reluctant participant in this area, funding studies in the mid-1990s only on the repeated urging of the academic research community. \n \nSocial anxiety disorder is a chronic, debilitating condition that has long been trivialized and even ignored. The high prevalence of social anxiety disorder became apparent after publication of the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) data in 1994.1 This congressionally mandated survey measured the presence of psychiatric diagnoses in more than 8,000 randomly selected American adults living in the community. As a result of this landmark study, social anxiety disorder was recognized as a condition to be taken seriously. The NCS study found that social anxiety disorder has a lifetime prevalence of 13.3%. It is the third most common disabling psychiatric disorder, after major depression (17.1%) and alcohol dependence (14.1%), and is the single most common disabling anxiety disorder in the United States. \n \nPersons with social anxiety disorder dread scrutiny and embarrassment in social and performance situations. Symptoms are often so severe that they either avoid interpersonal interactions or endure them with dread. This leads to academic underachievement, poor performance at work, and isolated, lonely living. Social anxiety disorder is a persistent, lifelong condition with an insidious onset in childhood or adolescence. The development of social anxiety disorder in a child or teenager is a harbinger of a lifetime of suffering and comorbidity. Most persons with social anxiety disorder later develop major depression, and many will abuse or become dependent on alcohol. The combination of social anxiety disorder and depression is particularly deadly and is associated with a 6-fold greater risk of suicide attempts.2 Dysfunction and missed opportunities are hallmark sequelae of social anxiety disorder. Compared with control subjects, individuals with social anxiety disorder are 8.4% less likely to graduate from college, 14.5% less likely to secure a professional, technical, or managerial job, and will earn wages that are 14% lower.3 \n \nThe good news is that social anxiety disorder is treatable. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are effective,4 but concerns about adverse effects limit their use. It was not until late in the past decade that the SSRIs were shown to be a safe and effective treatment.5 \n \nThe need for early recognition and intervention is clear and compelling. Yet, why is this condition so overlooked and undertreated? \n \nThere are numerous barriers to care. Social anxiety disorder, by definition, makes patients hesitant to seek treatment for this disability. Many have had symptoms for decades and believe that this is the way life is supposed to be. Physicians and other health care professionals do not actively look for social anxiety disorder and often do not take it seriously. Following the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the use of paroxetine for the treatment of social anxiety disorder, the pharmaceutical industry went to great lengths to educate the mental health community, primary care providers, and the public about this disorder. For this, they are to be applauded, not condemned. Medical luddites, in failing to embrace scientific advances, and even obstructing them, only perpetuate human suffering and contribute to scientific malfeasance. We should economically reward any successful effort to relieve human suffering, not disparage it. It will encourage others to invest more in finding effective treatments for medical illnesses. This is a more successful and a more compassionate strategy.","PeriodicalId":22925,"journal":{"name":"The Western journal of medicine","volume":"11 11 1","pages":"365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Have drug companies hyped social anxiety disorder to increase sales. No: Efforts to relieve human suffering deserve rewards.\",\"authors\":\"D. Sheehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/EWJM.175.6.365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The US News and World Report cover story, “How Shy Is Too Shy?” captured the debate about the pharmaceutical industry's role in bringing social anxiety disorder to the forefront of public awareness. Drug companies have been accused of fabricating this disorder to boost sales of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This is untrue and does a great disservice to patients. In fact, the pharmaceutical industry was a reluctant participant in this area, funding studies in the mid-1990s only on the repeated urging of the academic research community. \\n \\nSocial anxiety disorder is a chronic, debilitating condition that has long been trivialized and even ignored. The high prevalence of social anxiety disorder became apparent after publication of the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) data in 1994.1 This congressionally mandated survey measured the presence of psychiatric diagnoses in more than 8,000 randomly selected American adults living in the community. As a result of this landmark study, social anxiety disorder was recognized as a condition to be taken seriously. The NCS study found that social anxiety disorder has a lifetime prevalence of 13.3%. It is the third most common disabling psychiatric disorder, after major depression (17.1%) and alcohol dependence (14.1%), and is the single most common disabling anxiety disorder in the United States. \\n \\nPersons with social anxiety disorder dread scrutiny and embarrassment in social and performance situations. Symptoms are often so severe that they either avoid interpersonal interactions or endure them with dread. This leads to academic underachievement, poor performance at work, and isolated, lonely living. Social anxiety disorder is a persistent, lifelong condition with an insidious onset in childhood or adolescence. The development of social anxiety disorder in a child or teenager is a harbinger of a lifetime of suffering and comorbidity. Most persons with social anxiety disorder later develop major depression, and many will abuse or become dependent on alcohol. The combination of social anxiety disorder and depression is particularly deadly and is associated with a 6-fold greater risk of suicide attempts.2 Dysfunction and missed opportunities are hallmark sequelae of social anxiety disorder. Compared with control subjects, individuals with social anxiety disorder are 8.4% less likely to graduate from college, 14.5% less likely to secure a professional, technical, or managerial job, and will earn wages that are 14% lower.3 \\n \\nThe good news is that social anxiety disorder is treatable. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are effective,4 but concerns about adverse effects limit their use. It was not until late in the past decade that the SSRIs were shown to be a safe and effective treatment.5 \\n \\nThe need for early recognition and intervention is clear and compelling. Yet, why is this condition so overlooked and undertreated? \\n \\nThere are numerous barriers to care. Social anxiety disorder, by definition, makes patients hesitant to seek treatment for this disability. Many have had symptoms for decades and believe that this is the way life is supposed to be. Physicians and other health care professionals do not actively look for social anxiety disorder and often do not take it seriously. Following the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the use of paroxetine for the treatment of social anxiety disorder, the pharmaceutical industry went to great lengths to educate the mental health community, primary care providers, and the public about this disorder. For this, they are to be applauded, not condemned. Medical luddites, in failing to embrace scientific advances, and even obstructing them, only perpetuate human suffering and contribute to scientific malfeasance. We should economically reward any successful effort to relieve human suffering, not disparage it. It will encourage others to invest more in finding effective treatments for medical illnesses. This is a more successful and a more compassionate strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Western journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 11 1\",\"pages\":\"365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Western journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/EWJM.175.6.365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EWJM.175.6.365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《美国新闻与世界报道》的封面故事是《害羞到底有多害羞?》,抓住了关于制药行业在将社交焦虑症推向公众意识前沿方面所扮演角色的争论。制药公司被指控捏造这种疾病,以促进选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的销售。这是不真实的,对病人造成了极大的伤害。事实上,制药行业并不愿意参与这一领域,只是在学术研究界的一再敦促下,才在20世纪90年代中期资助研究。社交焦虑症是一种慢性衰弱疾病,长期以来一直被轻视甚至忽视。在1994年国家共病调查(NCS)数据公布后,社交焦虑障碍的高患病率变得明显。4.1这项国会授权的调查测量了随机选择的8000多名居住在社区的美国成年人的精神病诊断情况。由于这项具有里程碑意义的研究,社交焦虑障碍被认为是一种需要认真对待的疾病。NCS的研究发现,社交焦虑症的终生患病率为13.3%。它是继重度抑郁症(17.1%)和酒精依赖(14.1%)之后的第三大致残精神障碍,也是美国最常见的致残焦虑症。患有社交焦虑障碍的人害怕在社交和表演场合受到审视和尴尬。症状通常非常严重,以至于他们要么避免人际交往,要么带着恐惧忍受。这会导致学业成绩不佳,工作表现不佳,生活孤立、孤独。社交焦虑障碍是一种持续的、终生的状况,在儿童或青少年时期潜伏发作。儿童或青少年社交焦虑障碍的发展预示着一生的痛苦和共病。大多数患有社交焦虑障碍的人后来会发展为重度抑郁症,许多人会滥用或依赖酒精。社交焦虑障碍和抑郁的结合是特别致命的,与自杀企图的风险增加6倍有关功能障碍和错失机会是社交焦虑症的标志性后遗症。与对照组相比,患有社交焦虑症的人从大学毕业的可能性要低8.4%,找到专业、技术或管理工作的可能性要低14.5%,工资也要低14%好消息是社交焦虑症是可以治疗的。单胺氧化酶抑制剂是有效的,但对不良反应的担忧限制了它们的使用。直到最近十年,ssri类药物才被证明是一种安全有效的治疗方法早期识别和干预的必要性是明确而迫切的。然而,为什么这种情况如此被忽视和治疗不足?护理有许多障碍。从定义上讲,社交焦虑症使患者在寻求治疗这种残疾时犹豫不决。许多人几十年来都有症状,并认为这就是生活应该有的方式。医生和其他卫生保健专业人员并不积极寻找社交焦虑症,而且往往不把它当回事。在美国食品和药物管理局批准使用帕罗西汀治疗社交焦虑症之后,制药行业不遗余力地向精神健康社区、初级保健提供者和公众宣传这种疾病。为此,他们应该受到赞扬,而不是谴责。医学勒德分子不接受科学进步,甚至阻碍科学进步,只会使人类的痛苦永久化,助长科学上的渎职行为。我们应该从经济上奖励任何减轻人类痛苦的成功努力,而不是贬低它。它将鼓励其他国家在寻找有效治疗医学疾病方面投入更多资金。这是一个更成功、更富有同情心的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Have drug companies hyped social anxiety disorder to increase sales. No: Efforts to relieve human suffering deserve rewards.
The US News and World Report cover story, “How Shy Is Too Shy?” captured the debate about the pharmaceutical industry's role in bringing social anxiety disorder to the forefront of public awareness. Drug companies have been accused of fabricating this disorder to boost sales of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This is untrue and does a great disservice to patients. In fact, the pharmaceutical industry was a reluctant participant in this area, funding studies in the mid-1990s only on the repeated urging of the academic research community. Social anxiety disorder is a chronic, debilitating condition that has long been trivialized and even ignored. The high prevalence of social anxiety disorder became apparent after publication of the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) data in 1994.1 This congressionally mandated survey measured the presence of psychiatric diagnoses in more than 8,000 randomly selected American adults living in the community. As a result of this landmark study, social anxiety disorder was recognized as a condition to be taken seriously. The NCS study found that social anxiety disorder has a lifetime prevalence of 13.3%. It is the third most common disabling psychiatric disorder, after major depression (17.1%) and alcohol dependence (14.1%), and is the single most common disabling anxiety disorder in the United States. Persons with social anxiety disorder dread scrutiny and embarrassment in social and performance situations. Symptoms are often so severe that they either avoid interpersonal interactions or endure them with dread. This leads to academic underachievement, poor performance at work, and isolated, lonely living. Social anxiety disorder is a persistent, lifelong condition with an insidious onset in childhood or adolescence. The development of social anxiety disorder in a child or teenager is a harbinger of a lifetime of suffering and comorbidity. Most persons with social anxiety disorder later develop major depression, and many will abuse or become dependent on alcohol. The combination of social anxiety disorder and depression is particularly deadly and is associated with a 6-fold greater risk of suicide attempts.2 Dysfunction and missed opportunities are hallmark sequelae of social anxiety disorder. Compared with control subjects, individuals with social anxiety disorder are 8.4% less likely to graduate from college, 14.5% less likely to secure a professional, technical, or managerial job, and will earn wages that are 14% lower.3 The good news is that social anxiety disorder is treatable. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are effective,4 but concerns about adverse effects limit their use. It was not until late in the past decade that the SSRIs were shown to be a safe and effective treatment.5 The need for early recognition and intervention is clear and compelling. Yet, why is this condition so overlooked and undertreated? There are numerous barriers to care. Social anxiety disorder, by definition, makes patients hesitant to seek treatment for this disability. Many have had symptoms for decades and believe that this is the way life is supposed to be. Physicians and other health care professionals do not actively look for social anxiety disorder and often do not take it seriously. Following the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the use of paroxetine for the treatment of social anxiety disorder, the pharmaceutical industry went to great lengths to educate the mental health community, primary care providers, and the public about this disorder. For this, they are to be applauded, not condemned. Medical luddites, in failing to embrace scientific advances, and even obstructing them, only perpetuate human suffering and contribute to scientific malfeasance. We should economically reward any successful effort to relieve human suffering, not disparage it. It will encourage others to invest more in finding effective treatments for medical illnesses. This is a more successful and a more compassionate strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信