沙特阿拉伯利雅得牙科和医疗从业者对循证实践的认识和态度。比较研究

Nahid Ashri , Haifa Al-Amro , Lubna Hamadah , Sahr Al-Tuwaijri , Ashraf El Metwally
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯利雅得牙科和医疗从业者对循证实践的认识和态度。比较研究","authors":"Nahid Ashri ,&nbsp;Haifa Al-Amro ,&nbsp;Lubna Hamadah ,&nbsp;Sahr Al-Tuwaijri ,&nbsp;Ashraf El Metwally","doi":"10.1016/j.ksujds.2013.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine and compare different levels of awareness and attitude toward Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among dental and medical practitioners in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was completed by 300 practitioners (150 dentists and 150 medical practitioners) working at different academic, governmental, and private sectors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire assessed practitioner’s attitude toward EBP in terms of application and usage; awareness and usage of bibliographic database; history of training in EBP; perception of their understanding of technical terms used in scientific research and opinion with respect to barriers for the use of EBP and Evidence-Based Dentistry in Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of those who were invited to participate, 76.7% returned fully completed questionnaires. Physicians and dentists had an overall favorable attitude toward EBP, with 85% showing interest in the current promotion for this process and 97% agreeing that it improves patients’ care. However, 55% believe that it poses extra demands on already overloaded clinicians. No significant differences were found between dentists and physicians with respect to all attitude items. Significantly fewer dentists indicated understanding the terms: number needed to treat (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), odds ratio (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007), meta-analysis (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) and confidence intervals (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). Less than half of dentists and physicians received formal training in search strategies (43.8%), critical appraisal (34.4%) and other EBP skills (40.6%), while only 38.8% (significantly lower among dentists; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009) reported using Evidence-Based Practice guidelines. Significantly more physicians reported having accessibility to Medline through their office computer (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EBP has not been used to its maximum, despite excellent attitude toward its usage among both physicians and dentists. More efforts should be put into strengthening the skills and use of EBP among all medical practitioners, particularly among dentists, working in Saudi Arabia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101249,"journal":{"name":"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 109-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ksujds.2013.11.003","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental and medical practitioners’ awareness and attitude toward evidence based practice in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Nahid Ashri ,&nbsp;Haifa Al-Amro ,&nbsp;Lubna Hamadah ,&nbsp;Sahr Al-Tuwaijri ,&nbsp;Ashraf El Metwally\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ksujds.2013.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine and compare different levels of awareness and attitude toward Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among dental and medical practitioners in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was completed by 300 practitioners (150 dentists and 150 medical practitioners) working at different academic, governmental, and private sectors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire assessed practitioner’s attitude toward EBP in terms of application and usage; awareness and usage of bibliographic database; history of training in EBP; perception of their understanding of technical terms used in scientific research and opinion with respect to barriers for the use of EBP and Evidence-Based Dentistry in Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of those who were invited to participate, 76.7% returned fully completed questionnaires. Physicians and dentists had an overall favorable attitude toward EBP, with 85% showing interest in the current promotion for this process and 97% agreeing that it improves patients’ care. However, 55% believe that it poses extra demands on already overloaded clinicians. No significant differences were found between dentists and physicians with respect to all attitude items. Significantly fewer dentists indicated understanding the terms: number needed to treat (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), odds ratio (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007), meta-analysis (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) and confidence intervals (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). Less than half of dentists and physicians received formal training in search strategies (43.8%), critical appraisal (34.4%) and other EBP skills (40.6%), while only 38.8% (significantly lower among dentists; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009) reported using Evidence-Based Practice guidelines. Significantly more physicians reported having accessibility to Medline through their office computer (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EBP has not been used to its maximum, despite excellent attitude toward its usage among both physicians and dentists. More efforts should be put into strengthening the skills and use of EBP among all medical practitioners, particularly among dentists, working in Saudi Arabia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 109-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ksujds.2013.11.003\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210815713000437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Saudi Journal for Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210815713000437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

目的确定并比较沙特阿拉伯利雅得地区牙科和医疗从业人员对循证实践(EBP)的不同程度的认识和态度。方法在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的不同学术、政府和私营部门工作的300名从业人员(150名牙医和150名医疗从业人员)完成了一项采用自我填写问卷的横断面研究。问卷从应用和使用两方面评估从业者对EBP的态度;书目数据库的认识与利用EBP培训历史;他们对科学研究中使用的技术术语的理解,以及对在沙特阿拉伯使用EBP和循证牙科的障碍的看法。结果在被邀请参加的人中,76.7%的人完整地返回了问卷。医生和牙医对EBP的总体态度是有利的,85%的人对目前的推广感兴趣,97%的人同意它改善了患者的护理。然而,55%的人认为这对已经超负荷的临床医生提出了额外的要求。在所有态度项目上,牙医和医生之间没有发现显著差异。明显较少的牙医表示理解以下术语:治疗所需人数(P = 0.001)、优势比(P = 0.007)、荟萃分析(P = 0.02)和置信区间(P = 0.04)。不到一半的牙医和医生接受过搜索策略(43.8%)、批判性评估(34.4%)和其他EBP技能(40.6%)的正规培训,而只有38.8%(牙医中明显低于;P = 0.009)报告使用循证实践指南。更多的医生报告他们可以通过办公室电脑访问Medline (P = 0.003)。结论尽管医师和牙医对ebp的使用态度很好,但并未充分利用ebp。应作出更多努力,加强在沙特阿拉伯工作的所有医疗从业人员,特别是牙医的技能和EBP的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dental and medical practitioners’ awareness and attitude toward evidence based practice in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A comparative study

Objective

To determine and compare different levels of awareness and attitude toward Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among dental and medical practitioners in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was completed by 300 practitioners (150 dentists and 150 medical practitioners) working at different academic, governmental, and private sectors in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire assessed practitioner’s attitude toward EBP in terms of application and usage; awareness and usage of bibliographic database; history of training in EBP; perception of their understanding of technical terms used in scientific research and opinion with respect to barriers for the use of EBP and Evidence-Based Dentistry in Saudi Arabia.

Results

Of those who were invited to participate, 76.7% returned fully completed questionnaires. Physicians and dentists had an overall favorable attitude toward EBP, with 85% showing interest in the current promotion for this process and 97% agreeing that it improves patients’ care. However, 55% believe that it poses extra demands on already overloaded clinicians. No significant differences were found between dentists and physicians with respect to all attitude items. Significantly fewer dentists indicated understanding the terms: number needed to treat (P = 0.001), odds ratio (P = 0.007), meta-analysis (P = 0.02) and confidence intervals (P = 0.04). Less than half of dentists and physicians received formal training in search strategies (43.8%), critical appraisal (34.4%) and other EBP skills (40.6%), while only 38.8% (significantly lower among dentists; P = 0.009) reported using Evidence-Based Practice guidelines. Significantly more physicians reported having accessibility to Medline through their office computer (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

EBP has not been used to its maximum, despite excellent attitude toward its usage among both physicians and dentists. More efforts should be put into strengthening the skills and use of EBP among all medical practitioners, particularly among dentists, working in Saudi Arabia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信