急诊科专科医师对医院急诊科指标的了解及其在病人治疗中的作用:一项质性研究

Q3 Medicine
G. Masoumi, M. Rezai, A. Dehghani, Shahindokht Hasanpor, Sayyed Kasra Fatemi
{"title":"急诊科专科医师对医院急诊科指标的了解及其在病人治疗中的作用:一项质性研究","authors":"G. Masoumi, M. Rezai, A. Dehghani, Shahindokht Hasanpor, Sayyed Kasra Fatemi","doi":"10.5812/semj-130697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: National indicators have been defined for the satisfaction and efficiency of emergency services and for evaluating their functionality. These indicators enlighten strengths and areas where improvements can help improve emergency ward quality. Objectives: This study assessed the knowledge of medical specialists and their experiences, especially concerning the effects of these protocols. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in 2019 in the emergency departments of hospitals affiliated with the Iran University of Medical Sciences. During semi-structured interviews with 20 professors of emergency medicine in 2019, their experiences regarding the effects of these indicators on providing emergency services were evaluated. The data were collected until saturation. All interviews were recorded with the participant’s permission and then transcribed verbatim and analyzed by content analysis method, and their semantic codes were extracted. Results: By analyzing the interviews, 14 subcategories, and four main categories were obtained. Categories and subcategories consisted of providing services to patients (with three subcategories: Improving the quality of medical services, waiting time reduction, and increasing satisfaction), improving emergency efficiency and performance (with five subcategories: Improving conditions, services, communication improvement, resource management, and facilities and equipment), accreditation (with three subcategories: Performance improvement, management and planning, and service quality improvement), and proposed indicators (with three subcategories: Time, capacity, and resources). Conclusions: The recognition of emergency medicine specialists in hospital emergencies is below average, which can affect the manner of providing health services and upgrading national indicators. With more and more familiarity of emergency medicine specialists with the indicators, a step can be taken to improve the status of hospital emergencies, thus determining patients’ tasks faster, reducing the length of stay in the emergency department, increasing patient satisfaction, and improving the performance of the emergency department.","PeriodicalId":39157,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Medicine Specialists’ Knowledge of Hospital Emergency Department Indicators and Their Role in Patient Treatment: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"G. Masoumi, M. Rezai, A. Dehghani, Shahindokht Hasanpor, Sayyed Kasra Fatemi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/semj-130697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: National indicators have been defined for the satisfaction and efficiency of emergency services and for evaluating their functionality. These indicators enlighten strengths and areas where improvements can help improve emergency ward quality. Objectives: This study assessed the knowledge of medical specialists and their experiences, especially concerning the effects of these protocols. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in 2019 in the emergency departments of hospitals affiliated with the Iran University of Medical Sciences. During semi-structured interviews with 20 professors of emergency medicine in 2019, their experiences regarding the effects of these indicators on providing emergency services were evaluated. The data were collected until saturation. All interviews were recorded with the participant’s permission and then transcribed verbatim and analyzed by content analysis method, and their semantic codes were extracted. Results: By analyzing the interviews, 14 subcategories, and four main categories were obtained. Categories and subcategories consisted of providing services to patients (with three subcategories: Improving the quality of medical services, waiting time reduction, and increasing satisfaction), improving emergency efficiency and performance (with five subcategories: Improving conditions, services, communication improvement, resource management, and facilities and equipment), accreditation (with three subcategories: Performance improvement, management and planning, and service quality improvement), and proposed indicators (with three subcategories: Time, capacity, and resources). Conclusions: The recognition of emergency medicine specialists in hospital emergencies is below average, which can affect the manner of providing health services and upgrading national indicators. With more and more familiarity of emergency medicine specialists with the indicators, a step can be taken to improve the status of hospital emergencies, thus determining patients’ tasks faster, reducing the length of stay in the emergency department, increasing patient satisfaction, and improving the performance of the emergency department.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shiraz E Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shiraz E Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-130697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-130697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已经为紧急服务的满意度和效率以及评估其功能确定了国家指标。这些指标揭示了改进有助于提高急诊病房质量的优势和领域。目的:本研究评估了医学专家的知识和他们的经验,特别是关于这些方案的影响。方法:本定性研究于2019年在伊朗医科大学附属医院急诊科进行。在2019年对20位急诊医学教授的半结构化访谈中,我们评估了他们在这些指标对提供急诊服务的影响方面的经验。数据一直收集到饱和。所有访谈均在被访谈者同意的情况下进行录音,然后逐字抄录,并通过内容分析法进行分析,提取其语义代码。结果:通过访谈分析,得到14个小类,4个主要类。类别和子类别包括向患者提供服务(包括三个子类别:提高医疗服务质量、缩短等待时间和提高满意度)、提高急诊效率和绩效(包括五个子类别:改善条件、服务、改善沟通、资源管理以及设施和设备)、认证(包括三个子类别:绩效改进、管理和计划以及服务质量改进),以及建议的指标(包括三个子类别:时间、能力和资源)。结论:急诊医学专家在医院急诊中的认可度低于平均水平,影响了卫生服务的提供方式和国家指标的提升。随着急诊医学专家对这些指标的熟悉程度越来越高,可以进一步改善医院急诊状况,从而更快地确定患者的任务,缩短急诊科的住院时间,提高患者的满意度,提高急诊科的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Medicine Specialists’ Knowledge of Hospital Emergency Department Indicators and Their Role in Patient Treatment: A Qualitative Study
Background: National indicators have been defined for the satisfaction and efficiency of emergency services and for evaluating their functionality. These indicators enlighten strengths and areas where improvements can help improve emergency ward quality. Objectives: This study assessed the knowledge of medical specialists and their experiences, especially concerning the effects of these protocols. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in 2019 in the emergency departments of hospitals affiliated with the Iran University of Medical Sciences. During semi-structured interviews with 20 professors of emergency medicine in 2019, their experiences regarding the effects of these indicators on providing emergency services were evaluated. The data were collected until saturation. All interviews were recorded with the participant’s permission and then transcribed verbatim and analyzed by content analysis method, and their semantic codes were extracted. Results: By analyzing the interviews, 14 subcategories, and four main categories were obtained. Categories and subcategories consisted of providing services to patients (with three subcategories: Improving the quality of medical services, waiting time reduction, and increasing satisfaction), improving emergency efficiency and performance (with five subcategories: Improving conditions, services, communication improvement, resource management, and facilities and equipment), accreditation (with three subcategories: Performance improvement, management and planning, and service quality improvement), and proposed indicators (with three subcategories: Time, capacity, and resources). Conclusions: The recognition of emergency medicine specialists in hospital emergencies is below average, which can affect the manner of providing health services and upgrading national indicators. With more and more familiarity of emergency medicine specialists with the indicators, a step can be taken to improve the status of hospital emergencies, thus determining patients’ tasks faster, reducing the length of stay in the emergency department, increasing patient satisfaction, and improving the performance of the emergency department.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shiraz E Medical Journal
Shiraz E Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信