三种眼压计在健康印度眼中的比较

Sagarika Aggarwal, Wazid Ali, P. Rewri
{"title":"三种眼压计在健康印度眼中的比较","authors":"Sagarika Aggarwal, Wazid Ali, P. Rewri","doi":"10.33545/26638266.2022.v4.i1a.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tonometry has evolved over centuries to find an ideal instrument to correctly measure IOP. Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) remains the gold standard for tonometry. The newer tonometers have been developed which operate without anaesthesia, fluorescein dye and with no or minimal contact. This non-interventional, cross-sectional study was done to know the agreement between three types of tonometers –Goldmann applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer (RT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT), in Indian eyes of healthy individuals. When compared to GAT, the measured IOP difference was found to be within ±3 mm Hg in two seventy-six eyes (84.6%; 95% CI: 80.6-88.5%) with RT, and in two eighty-one eyes (86.1%; 95% CI: 82.3-89.8%) with NCT. Both RT and NCT can be used as screening tools for IOP measurement in clinical practice within a relative range of IOP and CCT.","PeriodicalId":14021,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of three types of tonometers in healthy Indian eyes\",\"authors\":\"Sagarika Aggarwal, Wazid Ali, P. Rewri\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/26638266.2022.v4.i1a.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tonometry has evolved over centuries to find an ideal instrument to correctly measure IOP. Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) remains the gold standard for tonometry. The newer tonometers have been developed which operate without anaesthesia, fluorescein dye and with no or minimal contact. This non-interventional, cross-sectional study was done to know the agreement between three types of tonometers –Goldmann applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer (RT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT), in Indian eyes of healthy individuals. When compared to GAT, the measured IOP difference was found to be within ±3 mm Hg in two seventy-six eyes (84.6%; 95% CI: 80.6-88.5%) with RT, and in two eighty-one eyes (86.1%; 95% CI: 82.3-89.8%) with NCT. Both RT and NCT can be used as screening tools for IOP measurement in clinical practice within a relative range of IOP and CCT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2022.v4.i1a.103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2022.v4.i1a.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

眼压计已经发展了几个世纪,以找到一种理想的仪器来正确测量眼压。戈德曼压平眼压计(GAT)仍然是眼压测量的金标准。较新的眼压计已经开发出来,不需要麻醉,荧光素染料,没有或很少接触。本非介入性横断面研究旨在了解三种类型眼压计-Goldmann眼压计、反弹眼压计(RT)和非接触式眼压计(NCT)在印度健康人眼中的一致性。与GAT相比,76只眼的IOP测量差异在±3mmhg以内(84.6%;95% CI: 80.6-88.5%),而在81只眼中(86.1%;95% CI: 82.3-89.8%)。在IOP和CCT的相对范围内,RT和NCT均可作为临床测量IOP的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of three types of tonometers in healthy Indian eyes
Tonometry has evolved over centuries to find an ideal instrument to correctly measure IOP. Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) remains the gold standard for tonometry. The newer tonometers have been developed which operate without anaesthesia, fluorescein dye and with no or minimal contact. This non-interventional, cross-sectional study was done to know the agreement between three types of tonometers –Goldmann applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer (RT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT), in Indian eyes of healthy individuals. When compared to GAT, the measured IOP difference was found to be within ±3 mm Hg in two seventy-six eyes (84.6%; 95% CI: 80.6-88.5%) with RT, and in two eighty-one eyes (86.1%; 95% CI: 82.3-89.8%) with NCT. Both RT and NCT can be used as screening tools for IOP measurement in clinical practice within a relative range of IOP and CCT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信