剖宫产术患者静脉自控镇痛与硬膜外镇痛效果比较

Y. Chen, Kuan-Hung Chen, Chien-Hui Yang, A. Concejero, C.-H. Wang, Tsung Shing Lee, K. W. Cheng, C. Tseng, B. Jawan
{"title":"剖宫产术患者静脉自控镇痛与硬膜外镇痛效果比较","authors":"Y. Chen, Kuan-Hung Chen, Chien-Hui Yang, A. Concejero, C.-H. Wang, Tsung Shing Lee, K. W. Cheng, C. Tseng, B. Jawan","doi":"10.1163/156856906775249758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) during the post-cesarean section (CS) period. The anesthesia records and pain control charts of 90 patients undergoing CS from July 2003 to April 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Twelve patients for emergency delivery and patients who refused to undergo regional anesthesia were grouped in Group I (GI); 78 patients received epidural anesthesia and were put in Group II (GII). Fourteen per cent of our patients received intravenous PCA following general anesthesia for CS. No differences in age, weight and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values on days 1–3 after intervention were observed between groups, but the total dose of morphine requirement to achieve adequate post-CS pain relief was significantly higher in GI than in GII.","PeriodicalId":19808,"journal":{"name":"Pain Clinic","volume":"39 1","pages":"31-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between effectiveness of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and epidural analgesia in patients undergoing Cesarean section\",\"authors\":\"Y. Chen, Kuan-Hung Chen, Chien-Hui Yang, A. Concejero, C.-H. Wang, Tsung Shing Lee, K. W. Cheng, C. Tseng, B. Jawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/156856906775249758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) during the post-cesarean section (CS) period. The anesthesia records and pain control charts of 90 patients undergoing CS from July 2003 to April 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Twelve patients for emergency delivery and patients who refused to undergo regional anesthesia were grouped in Group I (GI); 78 patients received epidural anesthesia and were put in Group II (GII). Fourteen per cent of our patients received intravenous PCA following general anesthesia for CS. No differences in age, weight and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values on days 1–3 after intervention were observed between groups, but the total dose of morphine requirement to achieve adequate post-CS pain relief was significantly higher in GI than in GII.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Clinic\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"31-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Clinic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/156856906775249758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/156856906775249758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究的目的是比较剖宫产后(CS)期间硬膜外镇痛与静脉自控镇痛(PCA)的有效性。回顾性分析2003年7月至2004年4月90例CS患者的麻醉记录和疼痛控制图。12例紧急分娩患者和拒绝区域麻醉患者分为I组(GI);78例患者行硬膜外麻醉,设II组(GII)。14%的患者在全身麻醉后接受静脉PCA治疗。干预后1-3天,各组患者的年龄、体重和视觉模拟评分(VAS)均无差异,但GI组为达到cs后疼痛缓解所需吗啡总剂量明显高于GII组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between effectiveness of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and epidural analgesia in patients undergoing Cesarean section
Abstract The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) during the post-cesarean section (CS) period. The anesthesia records and pain control charts of 90 patients undergoing CS from July 2003 to April 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Twelve patients for emergency delivery and patients who refused to undergo regional anesthesia were grouped in Group I (GI); 78 patients received epidural anesthesia and were put in Group II (GII). Fourteen per cent of our patients received intravenous PCA following general anesthesia for CS. No differences in age, weight and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values on days 1–3 after intervention were observed between groups, but the total dose of morphine requirement to achieve adequate post-CS pain relief was significantly higher in GI than in GII.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信