言语与手语的连贯关系

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Ludivine Crible, Sílvia Gabarró-López
{"title":"言语与手语的连贯关系","authors":"Ludivine Crible, Sílvia Gabarró-López","doi":"10.1075/LIC.19010.CRI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper provides the first contrastive analysis of a coherence relation (viz. addition) and its connectives across a\n sign language (French Belgian Sign Language) and a spoken language (French), both used in the same geographical area. The analysis examines\n the frequency and types of connectives that can express an additive relation, in order to contrast its “markedness” in the two languages,\n that is, whether addition is marked by dedicated connectives or by ambiguous, polyfunctional ones. Furthermore, we investigate the functions\n of the most frequent additive connective in each language (namely et and the sign SAME), starting from the observation that\n most connectives are highly polyfunctional. This analysis intends to show which functions are compatible with the meaning of addition in\n spoken and signed discourse. Despite a common core of shared discourse functions, the equivalence between et and SAME is\n only partial and relates to a difference in their semantics.","PeriodicalId":43502,"journal":{"name":"Languages in Contrast","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coherence relations across speech and sign language\",\"authors\":\"Ludivine Crible, Sílvia Gabarró-López\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LIC.19010.CRI\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper provides the first contrastive analysis of a coherence relation (viz. addition) and its connectives across a\\n sign language (French Belgian Sign Language) and a spoken language (French), both used in the same geographical area. The analysis examines\\n the frequency and types of connectives that can express an additive relation, in order to contrast its “markedness” in the two languages,\\n that is, whether addition is marked by dedicated connectives or by ambiguous, polyfunctional ones. Furthermore, we investigate the functions\\n of the most frequent additive connective in each language (namely et and the sign SAME), starting from the observation that\\n most connectives are highly polyfunctional. This analysis intends to show which functions are compatible with the meaning of addition in\\n spoken and signed discourse. Despite a common core of shared discourse functions, the equivalence between et and SAME is\\n only partial and relates to a difference in their semantics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LIC.19010.CRI\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages in Contrast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LIC.19010.CRI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文首次对在同一地理区域使用的手语(法语、比利时手语)和口语(法语)中的连贯关系(即加法)及其连接词进行了对比分析。该分析考察了可以表达加法关系的连接词的频率和类型,以对比两种语言中的“标记性”,即加法是由专用连接词还是由歧义的多功能连接词来标记的。此外,我们从观察到大多数连接词都是高度多功能的开始,研究了每种语言中最常见的附加连接词(即et和符号SAME)的功能。本分析旨在说明在口语语篇和手语语篇中,哪些功能与附加意义是相容的。尽管共享语篇功能具有共同的核心,但et和SAME之间的对等只是部分的,并且与它们在语义上的差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coherence relations across speech and sign language
This paper provides the first contrastive analysis of a coherence relation (viz. addition) and its connectives across a sign language (French Belgian Sign Language) and a spoken language (French), both used in the same geographical area. The analysis examines the frequency and types of connectives that can express an additive relation, in order to contrast its “markedness” in the two languages, that is, whether addition is marked by dedicated connectives or by ambiguous, polyfunctional ones. Furthermore, we investigate the functions of the most frequent additive connective in each language (namely et and the sign SAME), starting from the observation that most connectives are highly polyfunctional. This analysis intends to show which functions are compatible with the meaning of addition in spoken and signed discourse. Despite a common core of shared discourse functions, the equivalence between et and SAME is only partial and relates to a difference in their semantics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Languages in Contrast
Languages in Contrast LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Languages in Contrast aims to publish contrastive studies of two or more languages. Any aspect of language may be covered, including vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, text and discourse, stylistics, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. Languages in Contrast welcomes interdisciplinary studies, particularly those that make links between contrastive linguistics and translation, lexicography, computational linguistics, language teaching, literary and linguistic computing, literary studies and cultural studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信