苏联解体后通货膨胀和经济衰退的逃生路线

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Kaser
{"title":"苏联解体后通货膨胀和经济衰退的逃生路线","authors":"M. Kaser","doi":"10.5089/9781451952797.022.A007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ernment exchanged 50 billion “old” rubles for 1“new” ruble in a currency reform, ceased monetizing the budget deficit, and made the ruble convertible, Lenin’s New Economic Policy began to enjoy monetary stability. Severe inflation returned, however, when ruble convertibility was abrogated and the five-year plans began in 1928. Inflation was at first open, and, as rapidly rising consumer prices overtook state-fixed wages, household real incomes were cut to make resources available for investment and defense. Inflation was soon “repressed” by state dictation of prices, which was evident in persistent shortages and an overhang (surplus) of households’ unspent money. The demands of investment, the military, the bureaucracy, and education, health, and social welfare greatly exceeded the supply of labor and natural resources, which were, in any event, used inefficiently. The Soviet Union was transformed, through forced collectivization, from being a food exporter to being unable to feed itself. The command economy limited the competitive gains that could be made from international trade. Within the former Soviet Union, price relativities bore little or no relation to the balance between the supply of and the demand for goods or services. An operational price mechanism is essential to a market system, and the governments of the successor states to the Soviet Union accepted an immediate price liberalization, designed to switch inflation from “repressed” to “open,” eliminate the money overhang, and allow foreign prices to correct domestic relativities. The Baltic countries went straight for sound and stable currencies, backed by a continuing tight monetary policy. Benefiting from a shorter experience under the command economy, as well as a thoroughgoing switch to a market system and democratic government, these countries were rewarded by proportionately more foreign support. The remaining 12 countries that were to participate in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) continued to use the Soviet ruble, and had to follow Russia’s lead in January 1992 in decontrolling most retail and wholesale prices. They could not have anticipated the extent, or the persistence, of the ensuing price rise: in Russia, consumer prices rose 16-fold and producer prices rose 20-fold in 1992 alone. The following year, consumer prices in the CIS increased by 875 percent in Russia, 4,085 percent in Georgia, and 4,735 percent in Ukraine. Inflation spread through each of the 12 states and slackened only after the establishment of separate currencies.","PeriodicalId":39674,"journal":{"name":"Finance and Development","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escape Routes from Post-Soviet Inflation and Recession\",\"authors\":\"M. Kaser\",\"doi\":\"10.5089/9781451952797.022.A007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ernment exchanged 50 billion “old” rubles for 1“new” ruble in a currency reform, ceased monetizing the budget deficit, and made the ruble convertible, Lenin’s New Economic Policy began to enjoy monetary stability. Severe inflation returned, however, when ruble convertibility was abrogated and the five-year plans began in 1928. Inflation was at first open, and, as rapidly rising consumer prices overtook state-fixed wages, household real incomes were cut to make resources available for investment and defense. Inflation was soon “repressed” by state dictation of prices, which was evident in persistent shortages and an overhang (surplus) of households’ unspent money. The demands of investment, the military, the bureaucracy, and education, health, and social welfare greatly exceeded the supply of labor and natural resources, which were, in any event, used inefficiently. The Soviet Union was transformed, through forced collectivization, from being a food exporter to being unable to feed itself. The command economy limited the competitive gains that could be made from international trade. Within the former Soviet Union, price relativities bore little or no relation to the balance between the supply of and the demand for goods or services. An operational price mechanism is essential to a market system, and the governments of the successor states to the Soviet Union accepted an immediate price liberalization, designed to switch inflation from “repressed” to “open,” eliminate the money overhang, and allow foreign prices to correct domestic relativities. The Baltic countries went straight for sound and stable currencies, backed by a continuing tight monetary policy. Benefiting from a shorter experience under the command economy, as well as a thoroughgoing switch to a market system and democratic government, these countries were rewarded by proportionately more foreign support. The remaining 12 countries that were to participate in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) continued to use the Soviet ruble, and had to follow Russia’s lead in January 1992 in decontrolling most retail and wholesale prices. They could not have anticipated the extent, or the persistence, of the ensuing price rise: in Russia, consumer prices rose 16-fold and producer prices rose 20-fold in 1992 alone. The following year, consumer prices in the CIS increased by 875 percent in Russia, 4,085 percent in Georgia, and 4,735 percent in Ukraine. Inflation spread through each of the 12 states and slackened only after the establishment of separate currencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance and Development\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451952797.022.A007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance and Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451952797.022.A007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

政府在货币改革中将500亿“旧”卢布兑换为1“新”卢布,停止将预算赤字货币化,并使卢布可自由兑换,列宁的新经济政策开始享受货币稳定。然而,当卢布可兑换性被废除,五年计划于1928年开始实施时,严重的通货膨胀再次出现。通货膨胀起初是公开的,随着快速上涨的消费价格超过国家固定工资,家庭实际收入被削减,以使资源可用于投资和国防。通货膨胀很快就被国家对价格的控制所“抑制”,这在持续的物资短缺和家庭未支出资金的过剩(盈余)中表现得很明显。投资、军事、官僚机构、教育、卫生和社会福利的需求大大超过了劳动力和自然资源的供给,而这些资源在任何情况下都没有得到有效利用。通过强制集体化,苏联从一个粮食出口国转变为无法养活自己。计划经济限制了可以从国际贸易中获得的竞争性收益。在前苏联,价格相对与商品或服务的供需平衡关系不大,或者根本没有关系。可操作的价格机制对市场体系至关重要,苏联后继国家的政府立即接受了价格自由化,旨在将通货膨胀从“压抑的”转变为“开放的”,消除货币过剩,并允许国外价格纠正国内的相对关系。在持续紧缩的货币政策的支持下,波罗的海国家直接采取了稳健稳定的货币政策。得益于在计划经济下较短的经验,以及彻底转向市场体系和民主政府,这些国家得到了相应更多的外国支持。其余12个参加独立国家联合体(独联体)的国家继续使用苏联卢布,并不得不在1992年1月跟随俄罗斯的脚步,解除对大多数零售和批发价格的管制。他们不可能预料到随后价格上涨的程度或持续时间:仅在1992年,俄罗斯的消费者价格就上涨了16倍,生产者价格上涨了20倍。次年,独联体国家的消费价格上涨了875%,俄罗斯上涨了4085%,格鲁吉亚上涨了4085%,乌克兰上涨了4735%。通货膨胀蔓延到12个州,直到建立了独立的货币后才有所缓和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Escape Routes from Post-Soviet Inflation and Recession
ernment exchanged 50 billion “old” rubles for 1“new” ruble in a currency reform, ceased monetizing the budget deficit, and made the ruble convertible, Lenin’s New Economic Policy began to enjoy monetary stability. Severe inflation returned, however, when ruble convertibility was abrogated and the five-year plans began in 1928. Inflation was at first open, and, as rapidly rising consumer prices overtook state-fixed wages, household real incomes were cut to make resources available for investment and defense. Inflation was soon “repressed” by state dictation of prices, which was evident in persistent shortages and an overhang (surplus) of households’ unspent money. The demands of investment, the military, the bureaucracy, and education, health, and social welfare greatly exceeded the supply of labor and natural resources, which were, in any event, used inefficiently. The Soviet Union was transformed, through forced collectivization, from being a food exporter to being unable to feed itself. The command economy limited the competitive gains that could be made from international trade. Within the former Soviet Union, price relativities bore little or no relation to the balance between the supply of and the demand for goods or services. An operational price mechanism is essential to a market system, and the governments of the successor states to the Soviet Union accepted an immediate price liberalization, designed to switch inflation from “repressed” to “open,” eliminate the money overhang, and allow foreign prices to correct domestic relativities. The Baltic countries went straight for sound and stable currencies, backed by a continuing tight monetary policy. Benefiting from a shorter experience under the command economy, as well as a thoroughgoing switch to a market system and democratic government, these countries were rewarded by proportionately more foreign support. The remaining 12 countries that were to participate in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) continued to use the Soviet ruble, and had to follow Russia’s lead in January 1992 in decontrolling most retail and wholesale prices. They could not have anticipated the extent, or the persistence, of the ensuing price rise: in Russia, consumer prices rose 16-fold and producer prices rose 20-fold in 1992 alone. The following year, consumer prices in the CIS increased by 875 percent in Russia, 4,085 percent in Georgia, and 4,735 percent in Ukraine. Inflation spread through each of the 12 states and slackened only after the establishment of separate currencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance and Development
Finance and Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信