意识形态效应的解释与阐释:绿化带的修辞方法

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Y. Rydin, G. Myerson
{"title":"意识形态效应的解释与阐释:绿化带的修辞方法","authors":"Y. Rydin, G. Myerson","doi":"10.1068/d070463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors argue the advantages of an approach that explores the understanding of participants in political discourse. A spectrum of rhetorics is proposed which can provide a framework for such exploration and draws on what is termed ‘the rhetoric of partial rationality’ to examine a particular discourse, that concerning green belts. Throughout the paper it is stressed that such rhetorical analysis must be contextualised. Interpretation must complement, rather than replace, explanation. Providing complementary explanatory and interpretative analyses suggests a potential way of tackling ideological effects. Therefore the authors deal both with a general methodological issue—the analysis of ideological effects—and with a specific policy issue—green belts.","PeriodicalId":48303,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","volume":"32 1","pages":"463 - 479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining and Interpreting Ideological Effects: A Rhetorical Approach to Green Belts\",\"authors\":\"Y. Rydin, G. Myerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1068/d070463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors argue the advantages of an approach that explores the understanding of participants in political discourse. A spectrum of rhetorics is proposed which can provide a framework for such exploration and draws on what is termed ‘the rhetoric of partial rationality’ to examine a particular discourse, that concerning green belts. Throughout the paper it is stressed that such rhetorical analysis must be contextualised. Interpretation must complement, rather than replace, explanation. Providing complementary explanatory and interpretative analyses suggests a potential way of tackling ideological effects. Therefore the authors deal both with a general methodological issue—the analysis of ideological effects—and with a specific policy issue—green belts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"463 - 479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1068/d070463\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1068/d070463","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

作者论证了探索政治话语参与者理解的方法的优势。提出了一系列修辞学,可以为这种探索提供框架,并利用所谓的“部分理性的修辞”来检查有关绿化带的特定话语。全文强调,这种修辞分析必须结合语境。解释必须是对解释的补充,而不是取代。提供互补性的解释性和解释性分析是解决意识形态影响的一种潜在方法。因此,作者既要处理一般的方法论问题——意识形态效应分析,又要处理具体的政策问题——绿化带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explaining and Interpreting Ideological Effects: A Rhetorical Approach to Green Belts
The authors argue the advantages of an approach that explores the understanding of participants in political discourse. A spectrum of rhetorics is proposed which can provide a framework for such exploration and draws on what is termed ‘the rhetoric of partial rationality’ to examine a particular discourse, that concerning green belts. Throughout the paper it is stressed that such rhetorical analysis must be contextualised. Interpretation must complement, rather than replace, explanation. Providing complementary explanatory and interpretative analyses suggests a potential way of tackling ideological effects. Therefore the authors deal both with a general methodological issue—the analysis of ideological effects—and with a specific policy issue—green belts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: EPD: Society and Space is an international, interdisciplinary scholarly and political project. Through both a peer reviewed journal and an editor reviewed companion website, we publish articles, essays, interviews, forums, and book reviews that examine social struggles over access to and control of space, place, territory, region, and resources. We seek contributions that investigate and challenge the ways that modes and systems of power, difference and oppression differentially shape lives, and how those modes and systems are resisted, subverted and reworked. We welcome work that is empirically engaged and furthers a range of critical epistemological approaches, that pushes conceptual boundaries and puts theory to work in innovative ways, and that consciously navigates the fraught politics of knowledge production within and beyond the academy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信