与初级卫生保健中以人为中心的临床方法相关的因素:巴西阿雷格里港的一项研究

Rodrigo Caprio Leite De Castro, Daniela Riva Knauth
{"title":"与初级卫生保健中以人为中心的临床方法相关的因素:巴西阿雷格里港的一项研究","authors":"Rodrigo Caprio Leite De Castro, Daniela Riva Knauth","doi":"10.5750/ijpcm.v10i3.1063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The medical approach is influenced by several factors present at the patient, doctor, health service, society, and culture levels. Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to establish the degree of person-centeredness of care attributed by patients to the clinical approach of physicians from a primary health care (PHC) service and to ascertain its association with variables related to the care recipient. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of patients (n = 408) with hypertension and/or diabetes treated at 12 health centers belonging to a PHC network in the city of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The degree of person-centered clinical method (PCCM) orientation was measured by the “Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness” (PPPC) questionnaire. Results. The variables “educational attainment” and “duration of follow-up with the same physician” were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of low overall PPPC scores (corresponding to higher patient centeredness) assigned to physicians by the patients (PR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02–1.06, p-value < 0.001 and PR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02, p-value = 0.032, respectively). On the other hand, the variables “living alone” and “fair/poor/very poor self-perception of health” were significantly associated with a lower prevalence of person centeredness (PR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72–0.96, p-value = 0.011 and PR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77–1.00, p-value = 0.041, respectively). Conclusions. These findings demonstrate that clinical approaches to people with a high level of social vulnerability require improvement, and that the length of follow-up provided by one physician can be an indicator of the extent to which providers are able to deliver person-centered care.","PeriodicalId":89680,"journal":{"name":"International journal of person centered medicine","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PERSON-CENTERED CLINICAL METHOD IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: A STUDY IN PORTO ALEGRE, BRAZIL\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Caprio Leite De Castro, Daniela Riva Knauth\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/ijpcm.v10i3.1063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The medical approach is influenced by several factors present at the patient, doctor, health service, society, and culture levels. Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to establish the degree of person-centeredness of care attributed by patients to the clinical approach of physicians from a primary health care (PHC) service and to ascertain its association with variables related to the care recipient. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of patients (n = 408) with hypertension and/or diabetes treated at 12 health centers belonging to a PHC network in the city of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The degree of person-centered clinical method (PCCM) orientation was measured by the “Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness” (PPPC) questionnaire. Results. The variables “educational attainment” and “duration of follow-up with the same physician” were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of low overall PPPC scores (corresponding to higher patient centeredness) assigned to physicians by the patients (PR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02–1.06, p-value < 0.001 and PR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02, p-value = 0.032, respectively). On the other hand, the variables “living alone” and “fair/poor/very poor self-perception of health” were significantly associated with a lower prevalence of person centeredness (PR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72–0.96, p-value = 0.011 and PR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77–1.00, p-value = 0.041, respectively). Conclusions. These findings demonstrate that clinical approaches to people with a high level of social vulnerability require improvement, and that the length of follow-up provided by one physician can be an indicator of the extent to which providers are able to deliver person-centered care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v10i3.1063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of person centered medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v10i3.1063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。医疗方法受到存在于患者、医生、卫生服务、社会和文化层面的几个因素的影响。目的。本文的目的是建立患者对初级卫生保健(PHC)服务的医生临床方法的护理以人为中心的程度,并确定其与护理接受者相关的变量的关联。方法。这项横断面研究是在巴西南格兰德州阿雷格里港市一个PHC网络所属的12个卫生中心进行的高血压和/或糖尿病患者样本(n = 408)。采用“患者对以患者为中心的感知”(PPPC)问卷测量以人为中心的临床方法取向程度。结果。变量“受教育程度”和“与同一医生随访时间”与患者分配给医生的低总体PPPC评分(对应于更高的患者中心)的较高患病率显著相关(PR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02-1.06, p值< 0.001);PR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02, p值= 0.032)。另一方面,“独居”和“一般/差/非常差的自我健康感知”变量与较低的以人为中心的患病率显著相关(PR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72-0.96, p值= 0.011;PR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77-1.00, p值= 0.041)。结论。这些发现表明,对社会脆弱程度高的人的临床治疗方法需要改进,一名医生提供的随访时间可以作为提供者能够提供以人为本的护理的程度的一个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PERSON-CENTERED CLINICAL METHOD IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: A STUDY IN PORTO ALEGRE, BRAZIL
Background. The medical approach is influenced by several factors present at the patient, doctor, health service, society, and culture levels. Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to establish the degree of person-centeredness of care attributed by patients to the clinical approach of physicians from a primary health care (PHC) service and to ascertain its association with variables related to the care recipient. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of patients (n = 408) with hypertension and/or diabetes treated at 12 health centers belonging to a PHC network in the city of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The degree of person-centered clinical method (PCCM) orientation was measured by the “Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness” (PPPC) questionnaire. Results. The variables “educational attainment” and “duration of follow-up with the same physician” were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of low overall PPPC scores (corresponding to higher patient centeredness) assigned to physicians by the patients (PR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02–1.06, p-value < 0.001 and PR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02, p-value = 0.032, respectively). On the other hand, the variables “living alone” and “fair/poor/very poor self-perception of health” were significantly associated with a lower prevalence of person centeredness (PR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72–0.96, p-value = 0.011 and PR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77–1.00, p-value = 0.041, respectively). Conclusions. These findings demonstrate that clinical approaches to people with a high level of social vulnerability require improvement, and that the length of follow-up provided by one physician can be an indicator of the extent to which providers are able to deliver person-centered care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信