俄罗斯自由建制巩固的评估方法

Q1 Social Sciences
V. Kolmakov, A. Polyakova, S. Polyakov
{"title":"俄罗斯自由建制巩固的评估方法","authors":"V. Kolmakov, A. Polyakova, S. Polyakov","doi":"10.24818/AMP/2019.32-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article studies contemporary Russian liberal establishment from the point of view of the main actors’ propensity to consolidate. The authors identify distinguishing features of liberalism in Russia that determine the possible trends of cohesive interactions between the key actors and conclude that the main driver of consolidation is the protest and opposition to the current regime which is supported by the majority of population who tend to stigmatize the liberal activists due to that reason. The evidence of relatedness fluctuation is derived using the linkage index, introduced by the authors. The index is calculated using the results of actors’ discourse analysis based on social networks data (Twitter): mutual mentions and their contextual sentiments are taken to weigh pairs of actors regarding their unanimity or contradiction. Dynamic interpretation of calculated indexes of consolidation in the two broad periods, different in levels of information pressure from the mainstream media, provides evidence of consolidation change, and allows to identify key drivers of cohesion and attributable followers. The authors apply social network analysis techniques to verify the findings and to determine tiers of key liberal actors and their clusters. Concluding remarks provide interpretation of empiric study results and links to further development of consolidation research methodology.","PeriodicalId":38266,"journal":{"name":"Administratie si Management Public","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A valuation approach to the Russian liberal establishment consolidation\",\"authors\":\"V. Kolmakov, A. Polyakova, S. Polyakov\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/AMP/2019.32-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article studies contemporary Russian liberal establishment from the point of view of the main actors’ propensity to consolidate. The authors identify distinguishing features of liberalism in Russia that determine the possible trends of cohesive interactions between the key actors and conclude that the main driver of consolidation is the protest and opposition to the current regime which is supported by the majority of population who tend to stigmatize the liberal activists due to that reason. The evidence of relatedness fluctuation is derived using the linkage index, introduced by the authors. The index is calculated using the results of actors’ discourse analysis based on social networks data (Twitter): mutual mentions and their contextual sentiments are taken to weigh pairs of actors regarding their unanimity or contradiction. Dynamic interpretation of calculated indexes of consolidation in the two broad periods, different in levels of information pressure from the mainstream media, provides evidence of consolidation change, and allows to identify key drivers of cohesion and attributable followers. The authors apply social network analysis techniques to verify the findings and to determine tiers of key liberal actors and their clusters. Concluding remarks provide interpretation of empiric study results and links to further development of consolidation research methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administratie si Management Public\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administratie si Management Public\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/AMP/2019.32-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administratie si Management Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/AMP/2019.32-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文从主体倾向于巩固的角度来研究当代俄罗斯自由主义建制派。作者确定了俄罗斯自由主义的显著特征,这些特征决定了关键参与者之间凝聚力互动的可能趋势,并得出结论,巩固的主要驱动力是对当前政权的抗议和反对,这是由大多数人支持的,他们倾向于因此而对自由主义活动家进行污名化。相关性波动的证据是由作者引入的联系指数推导出来的。该指数是根据演员基于社交网络数据(Twitter)的话语分析结果计算出来的:相互提及和他们的语境情绪被用来衡量演员对他们的一致或矛盾。在主流媒体的信息压力水平不同的两个大时期,对合并计算指数的动态解释提供了合并变化的证据,并允许识别凝聚力和归因追随者的关键驱动因素。作者运用社会网络分析技术来验证这些发现,并确定关键自由行动者及其集群的层级。结束语提供了对实证研究结果的解释,并与进一步发展整合研究方法联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A valuation approach to the Russian liberal establishment consolidation
The article studies contemporary Russian liberal establishment from the point of view of the main actors’ propensity to consolidate. The authors identify distinguishing features of liberalism in Russia that determine the possible trends of cohesive interactions between the key actors and conclude that the main driver of consolidation is the protest and opposition to the current regime which is supported by the majority of population who tend to stigmatize the liberal activists due to that reason. The evidence of relatedness fluctuation is derived using the linkage index, introduced by the authors. The index is calculated using the results of actors’ discourse analysis based on social networks data (Twitter): mutual mentions and their contextual sentiments are taken to weigh pairs of actors regarding their unanimity or contradiction. Dynamic interpretation of calculated indexes of consolidation in the two broad periods, different in levels of information pressure from the mainstream media, provides evidence of consolidation change, and allows to identify key drivers of cohesion and attributable followers. The authors apply social network analysis techniques to verify the findings and to determine tiers of key liberal actors and their clusters. Concluding remarks provide interpretation of empiric study results and links to further development of consolidation research methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Administratie si Management Public
Administratie si Management Public Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Is an international academic journal, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Faculty of Administration and Public Management and the International Centre for Public Management. Is an open access journal published in English, twice a year. Is double peer-reviewed. Includes articles prepared by scholars, researchers and practitioners. Is addressed to the teachers, researchers, Ph. D students, master students, undergraduate students, public managers, civil servants and to other categories of readers. The papers published in this journal: - Contain the research results of some researches and surveys developed by the authors. - Include new theoretical/practical and original approaches that were presented and analysed by the authors. - Offer solutions for the public managers problems. - Stimulate the know-how transfer from an institution to another, from a country to another in the areas of administration and public management. The paper proposed for evaluation can be sent throughout the year, preferably by the end of April or before the end of October. Main areas covered by the journal articles are: public management; public administration; public policy; public services; social economy; social environment; management of the nongovernmental organizations; human resources management in the public sector; decision making in public organizations; governance; communication in public sector; sociology; demografy; migration; globalization; other related domains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信