{"title":"smw法堆焊高合金铁基堆焊材料的抗空蚀性","authors":"M. Szala, Tadeusz Hejwowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to investigate the cavitation erosion (CE) resistance of high-alloyed ferrous hardfacings, the three\ndifferent deposits were pad welded by the shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) method. Consumable\nelectrodes differed in the content of carbide-forming elements, and pad welds were deposited onto the S235JR\nstructural. The CE tests, conducted according to ASTM G32 standard, indicated that hardfacings reveal\nlower mass loss than the reference stainless steel AISI 304 (X5CrNi18-10). The hardfacings show increasing\nresistance to CE in the following order: Cr-C < Cr-C-Mo < Cr-C-Mo-V-W. The reference steel revealed more\nthan twenty times higher material loss in the CE test than Cr-C-Mo-V-W hardfacing, which had outstanding\nhardness (825HV0.3). The profilometric measurements and scanning electron microscopy investigations\nshowed large changes in valley and peak sizes of the roughness profiles for materials which displayed high\nerosion rates. The erosion mechanism of the coatings can be classified as brittle-ductile and relies on cracking,\nchunk removal of material, pits and craters formation, and deformation of fractured material tips and edges.\nHardfacing materials failed primarily due to brittle fractures with different severities. Specimen surface\ndegradation follows the changes in Ra, Rz, Rv, and Rp roughness parameters and well-corresponds to the\nproposed roughness rate (RR) parameter.\n\n","PeriodicalId":35004,"journal":{"name":"Tribologia: Finnish Journal of Tribology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAVITATION EROSION RESISTANCE OF HIGH-ALLOYED\\nFe-BASED WELD HARDFACINGS DEPOSITED VIA SMAW\\nMETHOD\",\"authors\":\"M. Szala, Tadeusz Hejwowski\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to investigate the cavitation erosion (CE) resistance of high-alloyed ferrous hardfacings, the three\\ndifferent deposits were pad welded by the shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) method. Consumable\\nelectrodes differed in the content of carbide-forming elements, and pad welds were deposited onto the S235JR\\nstructural. The CE tests, conducted according to ASTM G32 standard, indicated that hardfacings reveal\\nlower mass loss than the reference stainless steel AISI 304 (X5CrNi18-10). The hardfacings show increasing\\nresistance to CE in the following order: Cr-C < Cr-C-Mo < Cr-C-Mo-V-W. The reference steel revealed more\\nthan twenty times higher material loss in the CE test than Cr-C-Mo-V-W hardfacing, which had outstanding\\nhardness (825HV0.3). The profilometric measurements and scanning electron microscopy investigations\\nshowed large changes in valley and peak sizes of the roughness profiles for materials which displayed high\\nerosion rates. The erosion mechanism of the coatings can be classified as brittle-ductile and relies on cracking,\\nchunk removal of material, pits and craters formation, and deformation of fractured material tips and edges.\\nHardfacing materials failed primarily due to brittle fractures with different severities. Specimen surface\\ndegradation follows the changes in Ra, Rz, Rv, and Rp roughness parameters and well-corresponds to the\\nproposed roughness rate (RR) parameter.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribologia: Finnish Journal of Tribology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribologia: Finnish Journal of Tribology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribologia: Finnish Journal of Tribology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了研究高合金铁堆焊层的抗气蚀性,采用保护金属电弧焊(SMAW)方法对三种不同的堆焊层进行了焊敷。可焊电极中碳化物形成元素含量不同,焊焊缝沉积在s235jr结构上。根据ASTM G32标准进行的CE测试表明,堆焊面比参考不锈钢AISI 304 (X5CrNi18-10)的质量损失更小。堆焊表面抗CE性能的增强顺序为:Cr-C < Cr-C- mo < Cr-C- mo - v - w。参考钢在CE测试中显示的材料损耗比Cr-C-Mo-V-W堆焊高20倍以上,后者具有出色的硬度(825HV0.3)。轮廓测量和扫描电镜研究表明,高侵蚀率材料的粗糙度轮廓的谷和峰尺寸变化很大。涂层的侵蚀机制可分为脆性-韧性,主要依赖于材料的开裂、块状去除、凹坑和陨石坑的形成以及断裂材料尖端和边缘的变形。堆焊材料失效的主要原因是不同程度的脆性断裂。试样的表面降解遵循Ra, Rz, Rv和Rp粗糙度参数的变化,并且与提出的粗糙度率(RR)参数很好地对应。
CAVITATION EROSION RESISTANCE OF HIGH-ALLOYED
Fe-BASED WELD HARDFACINGS DEPOSITED VIA SMAW
METHOD
In order to investigate the cavitation erosion (CE) resistance of high-alloyed ferrous hardfacings, the three
different deposits were pad welded by the shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) method. Consumable
electrodes differed in the content of carbide-forming elements, and pad welds were deposited onto the S235JR
structural. The CE tests, conducted according to ASTM G32 standard, indicated that hardfacings reveal
lower mass loss than the reference stainless steel AISI 304 (X5CrNi18-10). The hardfacings show increasing
resistance to CE in the following order: Cr-C < Cr-C-Mo < Cr-C-Mo-V-W. The reference steel revealed more
than twenty times higher material loss in the CE test than Cr-C-Mo-V-W hardfacing, which had outstanding
hardness (825HV0.3). The profilometric measurements and scanning electron microscopy investigations
showed large changes in valley and peak sizes of the roughness profiles for materials which displayed high
erosion rates. The erosion mechanism of the coatings can be classified as brittle-ductile and relies on cracking,
chunk removal of material, pits and craters formation, and deformation of fractured material tips and edges.
Hardfacing materials failed primarily due to brittle fractures with different severities. Specimen surface
degradation follows the changes in Ra, Rz, Rv, and Rp roughness parameters and well-corresponds to the
proposed roughness rate (RR) parameter.