人民币汇率及其相关制度因素

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Y. Gang
{"title":"人民币汇率及其相关制度因素","authors":"Y. Gang","doi":"10.4324/9780203885321.ch3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, China has experienced rapid social and economic development. Against this backdrop, growing pressure for renminbi appreciation emerged and China's trade surplus and foreign reserves increased rapidly. This article explains the development of the RMB exchange rate by examining productivity growth and institutional factors, such as the transformation of the foreign exchange rate system and legal reforms to strengthen the hale of law. Development of the Renminbi Exchange Rate On January 1, 1994, China unified the \"dual\" exchange rate regime into a single one. The official rate before January 1, 1994 was 5.8 RMB per USD and 8.7 RMB per USD after exchange rate unification. Some observers argued that China depreciated the RMB by 40 percent in 1994. However, that argument is a misconception. Before 1994, China was still under the \"dual\" exchange rate regime, under which 80 percent of the foreign exchange trading volume was at the market rate, and only 20 percent at the official rate. The 8.7 RMB per USD rate was basically the market rate at the end of 1993. During 1993, the supply of foreign exchange mainly consisted of two sources: (1) joint-venture firms that were 'allowed to retain their foreign exchange, and (2) domestic export companies that had excess foreign exchange retained under the foreign exchange retention system. Under the \"dual\" exchange rate regime, if a firm needed foreign exchange to import, it could obtain foreign exchange through three channels: (1) buy foreign exchange at the market rate, (2) buy a quota from the market and use the quota to purchase foreign exchange at the official rate, and (3) apply for a quota from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) and use the quota to buy foreign exchange at the official rate. The price of a quota was roughly the difference between the official and the market rates. My estimation is that the weighted average of the RMB exchange rate depreciated by 4 percent vis-a-vis the dollar in 1993, compared with the 8.7 RMB per USD as the starting rate of the new regime at the beginning of 1994 (Table 1). The trade surplus in 1994 was very modest, only $5.4 billion. And the trade surplus for 1995-2004 was fairly stable, indicating that the RMB/USD exchange rate was close to its equilibrium level. the appreciation pressure afterward was partly driven by the productivity gains and the institutional reasons explained in this article, and partly by the weakening of U.S. dollar; especially since 2002. Since 1994, China has been promoting market-oriented reform of the RMB exchange rate mechanism. Three stages can be delineated: 1. 1994-96: a single and managed floating exchange rate regime based on market supply and demand. During this period, the nominal BMB/USD exchange rate rose by nearly 5 percent. 2. 1997-2005: after the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis China maintained a stable exchange rate at 8.28 RMB per USD. 3. July 2005-present: China reformed the RMB exchange rate regime by moving to a managed float based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies. The new system features and expanded floating band, an improved spot rate formation mechanism, the establishment of a forward market, reformed open market operations, and a more market-oriented foreign exchange management mechanism. From July 21, 2005, to the end of November 2007, the RMB appreciated by a total of 12 percent against the USD. According to the Bank for International Settlements, the nominal effective exchange rate index for the RMB increased by 40.9 percent from January 1994 to February 2002, decreased by 13.1 percent from February 2002 to July 2005, and rose again by 2.1 percent from July 2005 to November 2007. The real effective exchange rate index for the RMB rose by 58 percent from January 1994 to February 2002, decreased by 16.5 percent from February 2002 to July 2005, and then rose by 6. …","PeriodicalId":38832,"journal":{"name":"Cato Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"187-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renminbi Exchange Rates and Relevant Institutional Factors\",\"authors\":\"Y. Gang\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203885321.ch3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, China has experienced rapid social and economic development. Against this backdrop, growing pressure for renminbi appreciation emerged and China's trade surplus and foreign reserves increased rapidly. This article explains the development of the RMB exchange rate by examining productivity growth and institutional factors, such as the transformation of the foreign exchange rate system and legal reforms to strengthen the hale of law. Development of the Renminbi Exchange Rate On January 1, 1994, China unified the \\\"dual\\\" exchange rate regime into a single one. The official rate before January 1, 1994 was 5.8 RMB per USD and 8.7 RMB per USD after exchange rate unification. Some observers argued that China depreciated the RMB by 40 percent in 1994. However, that argument is a misconception. Before 1994, China was still under the \\\"dual\\\" exchange rate regime, under which 80 percent of the foreign exchange trading volume was at the market rate, and only 20 percent at the official rate. The 8.7 RMB per USD rate was basically the market rate at the end of 1993. During 1993, the supply of foreign exchange mainly consisted of two sources: (1) joint-venture firms that were 'allowed to retain their foreign exchange, and (2) domestic export companies that had excess foreign exchange retained under the foreign exchange retention system. Under the \\\"dual\\\" exchange rate regime, if a firm needed foreign exchange to import, it could obtain foreign exchange through three channels: (1) buy foreign exchange at the market rate, (2) buy a quota from the market and use the quota to purchase foreign exchange at the official rate, and (3) apply for a quota from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) and use the quota to buy foreign exchange at the official rate. The price of a quota was roughly the difference between the official and the market rates. My estimation is that the weighted average of the RMB exchange rate depreciated by 4 percent vis-a-vis the dollar in 1993, compared with the 8.7 RMB per USD as the starting rate of the new regime at the beginning of 1994 (Table 1). The trade surplus in 1994 was very modest, only $5.4 billion. And the trade surplus for 1995-2004 was fairly stable, indicating that the RMB/USD exchange rate was close to its equilibrium level. the appreciation pressure afterward was partly driven by the productivity gains and the institutional reasons explained in this article, and partly by the weakening of U.S. dollar; especially since 2002. Since 1994, China has been promoting market-oriented reform of the RMB exchange rate mechanism. Three stages can be delineated: 1. 1994-96: a single and managed floating exchange rate regime based on market supply and demand. During this period, the nominal BMB/USD exchange rate rose by nearly 5 percent. 2. 1997-2005: after the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis China maintained a stable exchange rate at 8.28 RMB per USD. 3. July 2005-present: China reformed the RMB exchange rate regime by moving to a managed float based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies. The new system features and expanded floating band, an improved spot rate formation mechanism, the establishment of a forward market, reformed open market operations, and a more market-oriented foreign exchange management mechanism. From July 21, 2005, to the end of November 2007, the RMB appreciated by a total of 12 percent against the USD. According to the Bank for International Settlements, the nominal effective exchange rate index for the RMB increased by 40.9 percent from January 1994 to February 2002, decreased by 13.1 percent from February 2002 to July 2005, and rose again by 2.1 percent from July 2005 to November 2007. The real effective exchange rate index for the RMB rose by 58 percent from January 1994 to February 2002, decreased by 16.5 percent from February 2002 to July 2005, and then rose by 6. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":38832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cato Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"187-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cato Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885321.ch3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885321.ch3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

近年来,中国社会经济快速发展。在此背景下,人民币升值压力不断加大,中国贸易顺差和外汇储备迅速增加。本文通过考察生产率增长和制度因素(如汇率制度的转变和加强法制的法律改革)来解释人民币汇率的发展。人民币汇率的发展1994年1月1日,中国将“二元”汇率制度统一为单一汇率制度。1994年1月1日前的官方汇率为1美元兑5.8元人民币,统一汇率后为1美元兑8.7元人民币。一些观察人士认为,中国在1994年将人民币贬值了40%。然而,这种说法是一种误解。1994年以前,中国仍然实行“双轨制”汇率制度,即80%的外汇交易量按市场汇率计算,只有20%按官方汇率计算。1993年底8.7元人民币兑1美元的汇率基本上是市场汇率。1993年期间,外汇供应主要有两种来源:(1)获准保留外汇的合资企业;(2)在外汇保留制度下有多余外汇保留的国内出口企业。在“二元”汇率制度下,如果企业需要进口外汇,可以通过三种渠道获得外汇:(1)按市场汇率购买外汇;(2)从市场上购买配额,用配额按官方汇率购买外汇;(3)向国家外汇管理局申请配额,用配额按官方汇率购买外汇。配额的价格大致是官方汇率和市场汇率之间的差额。我的估计是,1993年人民币兑美元的加权平均汇率贬值了4%,而1994年初新汇率制度开始时的汇率是8.7元人民币兑1美元(表1)。1994年的贸易顺差非常有限,只有54亿美元。1995-2004年的贸易顺差较为稳定,说明人民币兑美元汇率接近均衡水平。之后的升值压力部分是由生产率的提高和本文解释的制度原因驱动的,部分是由美元的疲软驱动的;尤其是自2002年以来。自1994年以来,中国一直在推进人民币汇率形成机制的市场化改革。可以划分为三个阶段:1。1994-96年:实行以市场供求为基础的单一和有管理的浮动汇率制度。在此期间,巴林货币兑美元的名义汇率上升了近5%。2. 1997-2005年:1997-98年亚洲金融危机后,中国将人民币兑美元汇率稳定在8.28。3.2005年7月至今:中国改革人民币汇率形成机制,实行以市场供求为基础,参考一篮子货币,有管理地浮动。新制度的特点是扩大浮动区间,完善即期汇率形成机制,建立远期市场,改革公开市场操作,建立更加市场化的外汇管理机制。2005年7月21日至2007年11月底,人民币对美元累计升值12%。据国际清算银行统计,1994年1月至2002年2月,人民币的名义有效汇率指数上升了40.9%,2002年2月至2005年7月下降了13.1%,2005年7月至2007年11月又上升了2.1%。人民币实际有效汇率指数从1994年1月到2002年2月上升了58%,从2002年2月到2005年7月下降了16.5%,然后又上升了6%。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renminbi Exchange Rates and Relevant Institutional Factors
In recent years, China has experienced rapid social and economic development. Against this backdrop, growing pressure for renminbi appreciation emerged and China's trade surplus and foreign reserves increased rapidly. This article explains the development of the RMB exchange rate by examining productivity growth and institutional factors, such as the transformation of the foreign exchange rate system and legal reforms to strengthen the hale of law. Development of the Renminbi Exchange Rate On January 1, 1994, China unified the "dual" exchange rate regime into a single one. The official rate before January 1, 1994 was 5.8 RMB per USD and 8.7 RMB per USD after exchange rate unification. Some observers argued that China depreciated the RMB by 40 percent in 1994. However, that argument is a misconception. Before 1994, China was still under the "dual" exchange rate regime, under which 80 percent of the foreign exchange trading volume was at the market rate, and only 20 percent at the official rate. The 8.7 RMB per USD rate was basically the market rate at the end of 1993. During 1993, the supply of foreign exchange mainly consisted of two sources: (1) joint-venture firms that were 'allowed to retain their foreign exchange, and (2) domestic export companies that had excess foreign exchange retained under the foreign exchange retention system. Under the "dual" exchange rate regime, if a firm needed foreign exchange to import, it could obtain foreign exchange through three channels: (1) buy foreign exchange at the market rate, (2) buy a quota from the market and use the quota to purchase foreign exchange at the official rate, and (3) apply for a quota from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) and use the quota to buy foreign exchange at the official rate. The price of a quota was roughly the difference between the official and the market rates. My estimation is that the weighted average of the RMB exchange rate depreciated by 4 percent vis-a-vis the dollar in 1993, compared with the 8.7 RMB per USD as the starting rate of the new regime at the beginning of 1994 (Table 1). The trade surplus in 1994 was very modest, only $5.4 billion. And the trade surplus for 1995-2004 was fairly stable, indicating that the RMB/USD exchange rate was close to its equilibrium level. the appreciation pressure afterward was partly driven by the productivity gains and the institutional reasons explained in this article, and partly by the weakening of U.S. dollar; especially since 2002. Since 1994, China has been promoting market-oriented reform of the RMB exchange rate mechanism. Three stages can be delineated: 1. 1994-96: a single and managed floating exchange rate regime based on market supply and demand. During this period, the nominal BMB/USD exchange rate rose by nearly 5 percent. 2. 1997-2005: after the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis China maintained a stable exchange rate at 8.28 RMB per USD. 3. July 2005-present: China reformed the RMB exchange rate regime by moving to a managed float based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies. The new system features and expanded floating band, an improved spot rate formation mechanism, the establishment of a forward market, reformed open market operations, and a more market-oriented foreign exchange management mechanism. From July 21, 2005, to the end of November 2007, the RMB appreciated by a total of 12 percent against the USD. According to the Bank for International Settlements, the nominal effective exchange rate index for the RMB increased by 40.9 percent from January 1994 to February 2002, decreased by 13.1 percent from February 2002 to July 2005, and rose again by 2.1 percent from July 2005 to November 2007. The real effective exchange rate index for the RMB rose by 58 percent from January 1994 to February 2002, decreased by 16.5 percent from February 2002 to July 2005, and then rose by 6. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cato Journal
Cato Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信