从范式到句法-形容词反义词:一些评论

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Magdalena Perz
{"title":"从范式到句法-形容词反义词:一些评论","authors":"Magdalena Perz","doi":"10.31261/neo.2020.32.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper raises and discusses the relation of antonymy in adjectives. Antonymy is considered to play an important role in organizing mental lexicon. This relation defined often in logical terms stands for paradigmatic relation, as presented in WordNet. However, the category of antonymous adjectives can depend on more than just the semantic qualities of a word. It is often highly context dependent. Adjectives have different interpretation depending on the noun they modify — it is no surprising that they produce different antonyms in different contexts. On the basis of few examples of investigations of antonymy, this paper argues that antonymy is not only a paradigmatic but also a syntagmatic relation. The paradigmatic-syntagmatic distinction is not always relevant to all antonymous adjectives.","PeriodicalId":41498,"journal":{"name":"Neo-Victorian Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Du paradigme vers le syntagme — l’antonymie adjectivale : quelques remarques\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Perz\",\"doi\":\"10.31261/neo.2020.32.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper raises and discusses the relation of antonymy in adjectives. Antonymy is considered to play an important role in organizing mental lexicon. This relation defined often in logical terms stands for paradigmatic relation, as presented in WordNet. However, the category of antonymous adjectives can depend on more than just the semantic qualities of a word. It is often highly context dependent. Adjectives have different interpretation depending on the noun they modify — it is no surprising that they produce different antonyms in different contexts. On the basis of few examples of investigations of antonymy, this paper argues that antonymy is not only a paradigmatic but also a syntagmatic relation. The paradigmatic-syntagmatic distinction is not always relevant to all antonymous adjectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neo-Victorian Studies\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neo-Victorian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31261/neo.2020.32.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neo-Victorian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/neo.2020.32.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出并讨论了形容词反义词的关系。反义词被认为在组织心理词汇方面起着重要作用。这种通常用逻辑术语定义的关系代表了范式关系,如WordNet中所示。然而,反义形容词的类别不仅仅取决于一个词的语义性质。它通常高度依赖于上下文。根据形容词所修饰的名词的不同,它们有不同的解释——在不同的语境中产生不同的反义词也就不足为奇了。本文通过对反义词的实例研究,论证了反义词不仅是一种范式关系,而且是一种组合关系。并不是所有的反义形容词都存在范式-句法的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Du paradigme vers le syntagme — l’antonymie adjectivale : quelques remarques
This paper raises and discusses the relation of antonymy in adjectives. Antonymy is considered to play an important role in organizing mental lexicon. This relation defined often in logical terms stands for paradigmatic relation, as presented in WordNet. However, the category of antonymous adjectives can depend on more than just the semantic qualities of a word. It is often highly context dependent. Adjectives have different interpretation depending on the noun they modify — it is no surprising that they produce different antonyms in different contexts. On the basis of few examples of investigations of antonymy, this paper argues that antonymy is not only a paradigmatic but also a syntagmatic relation. The paradigmatic-syntagmatic distinction is not always relevant to all antonymous adjectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neo-Victorian Studies
Neo-Victorian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信