吸气肌训练对造血干细胞受者呼吸肌力量的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Larissa Melo Sampaio, H. Fuzari
{"title":"吸气肌训练对造血干细胞受者呼吸肌力量的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Larissa Melo Sampaio, H. Fuzari","doi":"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate whether inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength and function and reduces dyspnea and fatigue in hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Participants: People with hematological neoplasms who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Intervention: Inspiratory muscle training with POWER breath Plus, POWERbreathe, Classic, and Threshold devices, with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure. Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the FEV1/FVC ratio. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, respiratory rate, peripheral O2 saturation, quality of life, and functional capacity. Results: The search identified 3 eligible studies with a sample of 108 participants. Maximal inspiratory pressure was higher in the intervention group in the 3 studies reviewed, with an average difference of −9.3 cm H2O, −31.94 cm H2O, and −16 cm H2O in relation to the control group after inspiratory muscle training. One study found an improvement in the distance covered in the 6-minute walk test (34.22 m) and in the distance covered in the modified incremental shuttle walking test (66.43 m) in the intervention group. Limitation: This systematic review includes only 3 randomized controlled clinical trials. Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle training is effective in increasing inspiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in bone marrow transplant recipients. However, its effects on fatigue and dyspnea remain uncertain.","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"9 1","pages":"96 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Melo Sampaio, H. Fuzari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To investigate whether inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength and function and reduces dyspnea and fatigue in hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Participants: People with hematological neoplasms who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Intervention: Inspiratory muscle training with POWER breath Plus, POWERbreathe, Classic, and Threshold devices, with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure. Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the FEV1/FVC ratio. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, respiratory rate, peripheral O2 saturation, quality of life, and functional capacity. Results: The search identified 3 eligible studies with a sample of 108 participants. Maximal inspiratory pressure was higher in the intervention group in the 3 studies reviewed, with an average difference of −9.3 cm H2O, −31.94 cm H2O, and −16 cm H2O in relation to the control group after inspiratory muscle training. One study found an improvement in the distance covered in the 6-minute walk test (34.22 m) and in the distance covered in the modified incremental shuttle walking test (66.43 m) in the intervention group. Limitation: This systematic review includes only 3 randomized controlled clinical trials. Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle training is effective in increasing inspiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in bone marrow transplant recipients. However, its effects on fatigue and dyspnea remain uncertain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"96 - 104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨吸气肌训练是否能改善造血干细胞受者的呼吸肌力量和功能,减轻呼吸困难和疲劳。设计:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。参与者:接受造血干细胞移植的血液肿瘤患者。干预:使用POWERbreath Plus、POWERbreathe、Classic和Threshold设备进行吸气肌训练,负荷为最大吸气压力的40%。结果指标:主要结果为最大吸气压力、最大呼气压力、呼气第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)和FEV1/FVC比值。次要结局为呼吸困难、疲劳、呼吸频率、外周氧饱和度、生活质量和功能能力。结果:搜索确定了3个符合条件的研究,样本为108名参与者。在回顾的3项研究中,干预组的最大吸气压力较高,与对照组相比,吸气肌训练后的最大吸气压力平均差值分别为- 9.3 cm H2O、- 31.94 cm H2O和- 16 cm H2O。一项研究发现,干预组在6分钟步行测试中行走距离(34.22米)和改进的增量穿梭行走测试中行走距离(66.43米)有所改善。局限性:本系统综述仅包括3个随机对照临床试验。结论:吸气肌训练能有效提高骨髓移植受者的吸气肌力量和功能。然而,其对疲劳和呼吸困难的影响仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Objective: To investigate whether inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength and function and reduces dyspnea and fatigue in hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Participants: People with hematological neoplasms who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Intervention: Inspiratory muscle training with POWER breath Plus, POWERbreathe, Classic, and Threshold devices, with a load of 40% of the maximum inspiratory pressure. Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the FEV1/FVC ratio. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, respiratory rate, peripheral O2 saturation, quality of life, and functional capacity. Results: The search identified 3 eligible studies with a sample of 108 participants. Maximal inspiratory pressure was higher in the intervention group in the 3 studies reviewed, with an average difference of −9.3 cm H2O, −31.94 cm H2O, and −16 cm H2O in relation to the control group after inspiratory muscle training. One study found an improvement in the distance covered in the 6-minute walk test (34.22 m) and in the distance covered in the modified incremental shuttle walking test (66.43 m) in the intervention group. Limitation: This systematic review includes only 3 randomized controlled clinical trials. Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle training is effective in increasing inspiratory muscle strength and functional capacity in bone marrow transplant recipients. However, its effects on fatigue and dyspnea remain uncertain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信